User talk:Sherryleehoward

Welcome!

Hello, Sherryleehoward, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 03:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Alpha Piscis Austrini. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moe Brooker have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alpha Piscis Austrini. Thanks for your input, but I always use my Sandbox. In fact, I write my articles in Word on my computer after I research them, then copy & paste to Sandbox & then to a wikipedia page. I try to be as thorough as possible, and I'm not experimenting. I am new to this & I'm still learning, and I appreciate helpful info. I am writing mostly about African American artists who only lately have been receiving coverage and acknowledgment, so I have to dig deep to find background info on them. Thanks, Sherryleehoward. Sherryleehoward (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. The reference list was...unusual, to say the least, and I think there were also errors in your copy and pasting as well (referring to the edit I reverted back in February). But I appreciate your hard work on the Wiki regardless. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When writing about Black artists, I have to rely extensively on Black newspapers because they were the only ones writing about these artists. In a few cases, white newspapers mentioned them. So my references will never be book/anthology heavy, until you get to the latter part of the 20th century and into the 21st century. btw, can you take a look at an article I just completed on Reba Dickerson-Hill with comments from other wikipediers. I'm not sure about what they're asking for. Thanks. Sherryleehoward (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Reba Dickerson-Hill instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sherryleehoward/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sherryleehoward/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I would like some help. I'm new to wikipedia in terms of writing articles, and am not sure how to address some of the issues (for example, spacing) left on the Reba Dickerson-Hill article. Sherryleehoward (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sherryleehoward! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know feature

Hi Sherryleehoward

I don't create many articles but when I do I always nominate them for a DYK on the main page, as this gets huge numbers of readers (thousands rather than dozens). See my own Talk Page for the templates that the process adds when they get accepted. The nomination process is a bit arcane but I'm very willing to help. New articles have to be nominated within 7 days of their entering Mainspace, so you've got until 18 May for Reba Dickerson-Hill. The place to do the nomination is Template_talk:Did_you_know, so read that carefully and ping me here on your Talk Page if you need assistance. Good luck! Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Mike. Will do. Sherryleehoward (talk) 16:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, I just posted an article on William Henry Dorsey that I think would be a good nominee for DYK. I've taken a look at the nomination process but unclear on what or how long the hook should be. Any suggestions? Thanks. Sherryleehoward (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sherryleehoward! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Spacing issues, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Thank you for contributing to the article Reba Dickerson-Hill‎. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 01:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kuru, thank you for your comments. But I'm at a loss because all of the issues you mention have nothing to do with the Reba Dickerson Hill article, which I wrote. It is sourced with verifiable and reliable sources, has no website references, and the facts were checked (that I learned from being a journalist for 30 years). I'm new to wikipedia (i've written about a dozen articles about Black and white artists), and a member of wikimedia in DC reviews all of my articles & this one was approved by her. As you'll see, much of the source info is from Black newspapers because they were the only ones writing about Black artists in the early 20th century. Sherryleehoward (talk) 16:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sherry, the article looks great overall - nice job! Kuru's note is specifically about one of the reference sources (Prabook.com), rather than the article overall. Unfortunately, Prabook isn't a reliable source for use on Wikipedia. Its content is a mix of information scraped from other sources (which often aren't reliable themselves) or contributed by other users (which would be considered user generated content). It looks like the main claim was attributed to Prabook was her education, so hopefully there's another, reliable source that can verify the information. Politanvm ^talk 21:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wish the writer had been more specific. Your explanation gives me a place to start. I will find another reference & avoid prabook.com in the future. Sherryleehoward (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sherryleehoward. Thank you for creating Henry B. Jones. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great article. Need an image of him and some of the work if available.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 10:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for a photo and artwork from his estate. All photos and artwork via Google are copyrighted as part of articles. I'm open to suggestions. Sherryleehoward (talk) 01:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your biographies

Hi there, Sherryleehoward. I've just been looking through your well researched biographies, most of which are now rated B-class. I see you suddenly stopped editing in January. I hope you are still around and will begin contributing again soon. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi lpigott, I dropped out to work on another project. I'm a volunteer at the Paul Robeson House & Museum in Philadelphia & we just completed a major celebration of his 125th birthday. So, now I'm getting ready to head back into it. Thanks for noticing. Sherryleehoward (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipiglott. hope you are still around. I'm back with another wiki article on an artist named Bettina WitteVeen. i tried moving the article from my sandbox to wikipedia, but it looks like something went wrong. When I tried searching for it in wikipedia, the article does not exist. I did find it under Wikipedia: Bettina WitteVeen.

I apparently did something wrong. Could certainly use your help. Sherryleehoward (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]