User talk:Shereth/Archive03

Thanks!

		My RFA
		User:TenPoundHammer and his romp of Wikipedia-editing otters thank you for participating in Hammer's failed request for adminship, and for the helpful tips given to Hammer for his and his otters' next run at gaining the key. Also, Hammer has talked to the otters, and from now on they promise not to leave fish guts and clamshells on the Articles for Deletion pages anymore. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 17:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal case

Thanks, I am completely willing to mediate and to take part in any discussion and compromise. Thanks for your help in this case. Cheers, Neranei ^T/C 05:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Echo the sentiment. There's an edit war on the article, and it would be nice to settle it. I've already commented extensively on the MedCab page. The best solution might be a separate criticism section, but I think it has to be more balanced and neutral in tone than the recent, highly POV additions of critical material to the article. Casey Abell 02:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, let's sort this out. Thanks for helping mediate! Neranei ^T/C 16:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox City v Geobox Settlement in Marin County

I like the new maps you have made for Marin County places, but it is not clear why you are converting from Geobox Settlement to Infobox City. In doing so you have removed information that I entered into the geoboxes that is not included elsewhere in the articles, as well as images that may be as valuable as those you have created. The infoboxes do not have locations for teh additional classes of information or for as many images. I can find no discussions about what you are doing on the article talk pages or on the template talk pages. Please explain or point me to your justification.--Hjal 07:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original discussion about this was at the Cities Wikiproject back in May, and you can find it archived at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Archive 7. The scope of what I am doing goes beyond Marin county or even California. As far as the infobox vs. geobox thing, the script I use defaults to infobox as opposed to geobox for the sake of consistency. Of 174 counties that I have processed with my script so far, Marin County is the only one to use geoboxes instead of infoboxes, and even then only for a few of the CDP articles. I was unaware that the transfer had lost some images - I've gone ahead and replaced the images.

I am curious to know what additional information has been lost that cannot be reduplicated with the infoboxes. In any case, I have only run in to this problem in 3 articles out of well over a thousand. All of the major city articles use {{infobox city}} instead of {{Geobox Settlement}}. It would seem to make sense to me to be more consistent and use the infobox version. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the term "Geobox" does not appear in that archive. Your maps are a huge improvement for the larger cities in Marin--the ones that show up as more than a dot, unlike Stinson Beach and Muir Beach. They are also much better than the similar maps already (or previously?) used for Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties, which used a strange projection for the State outline. A few things, however. It would have seemed to me proper to discuss this issue with the people who participate on many talk pages, such as the ones for any of the templates that you are displacing. It might be nice to raise the subject on County talk pages or at regional Wikiprojects. Maybe this was discussed at Marin County or WP:SFBA and I just didn't notice it. Your implementation of Infobox city is labelling rural CDPs "City," which is inappropriate, but I suppose that I can go into the box and override it. Finally, the Marin map, as good as it looks, has some problems. An outline map of Marin County that doesn't show Tomales Bay looks very peculiar to a local. (It would look weird to me just for leaving out Bolinas Lagoon, but I'm really local.) And the small CDPs are still little more than red dots. I prefer the maps of the CDPs that I was lifting from the Census American Factfinder, that showed the CDP outline at a scale that could be seen, although they don't provide the lcoation within the County, which is very nice. See my last version of Muir Beach with the geobox, [1], and your current version, [2]. Nevertheless, I couldn't have done your maps, so I appreciate the work--I'll just go back and add the missing stuff, either to the box or the text. The CDP maps work well in the demographics sections, so I don't need to be able to squeeze those back into the infoboxes.--Hjal 06:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing geoboxes with infoboxes was not part of the original intent of the project. It's just that in the course of the articles I have come across, I have come across a number of cities where someone has constructed a "raw" infobox not with a template but with various wikimarkup. I got used to changing those out, so when I ran across the geobox entries I first assumed they were also a couple of one-off examples. I still have yet to run across any more articles that use geobox aside from those 3 in Marin county. Either way it's not terribly important if geobox or infobox is used, the end result is basically the same :) For what it is worth, "Infobox City" is just an alias for "Infobox Settlement" - there are also redirects from "infobox town, infobox village, infobox borough, infobox place" and several others. They all have identical functionality and the difference is transparent to the reader.

As far as the maps go - they are all large scale maps, if you click them and go to the map itself you will see that they are much larger than they appear and you can get any detail desired :) They are also lossless vector maps so they can be resized by software without any loss of information, so additional resizing is certainly feasable. It's extremely difficult for me to customize these maps from the outset - they are all automatically generated from US Census boundary files. There's over 30,000 of them, so yeah it is awful hard for me to scrutinize and customize every one. They are easily editable however and I encourage anyone (including yourself) to improve them as seen fit. The precision and accuracy of my maps is limited to the precision and accuracy that the US Census Bureau puts in their boundary files. This is definitely where local expertise comes in to play, and I'd rely on help from other users to catch something I'd have missed.

Feel free to let me know if there's any other problems, though, or any other suggestions/ideas. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Del Norte County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Crescent City Highlighted.svg

Thanks for all the maps you've created. This one contains a minor error. The wrong county on the CA map is highlighted. The most northwesterly county should be highlighted. I wanted to bring it to your attention in case you're able to fix it easily. Thanks Alcuin 04:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I'm not sure how that mistake was made. I'll fix it shortly. Thanks for alerting me! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge into History of Hungary

While I admit the article on hungarian sources was only a stub, the history of hungary article is already twice the recommended Wikipedia:Article size of 32kb. Maybe we could expand the stub, rather than merging? Thanks, TheMightyQuill 04:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps split the history article into logical divisions? I agree that it is already a rather long article, pulling those few lines out won't make a big difference - but it might make sense to break the article into 2 or 3 pieces itself, for example, everything under section 1. Origins of the Hungarian State off by itself? Of course that'd be something to discuss on the article talk page :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 14:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

el cerrito

what about naming consistancy Mountain View, California (city) and Mountain View, California (CDP) were named Mt. View, CC County, CA and Mt. View CA respectively, doesnt the actual incorporated city have preference for NOT having the county in its title and other el cerritos should have to have the county also in the title? for instance there is also a neighborhood named el cerrito, its title is el cerrito, san diego, california, sicne its part of the city of san diegoChuchopacman 23:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The city's official name is simply "El Cerrito". The rest is all added on to make it clear which one we are talking about. When there is more than one city in a state the typical method of naming on Wikipedia is to disambiguate using the county name. Please read WP:NC:CITY for more information, and you may be interested to read the discussion on that page. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 23:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The History Channel mediation

Thank you very much for doing the informal mediation! I very much appreciate it, and am glad that all of this got sorted out. Thank you! Cheers, Neranei ^T/C 15:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always happy to help :) Looks like we had an easy case this time, but again I appreciate your efforts to get it sorted out. Happy editing! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and many blessings as you mediate much harder cases. Thanks again! Love, Neranei ^T/C 15:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfD

I noticed that you voted to keep the Wp:an/i and Wp:afd redirects at the Redirects for deletion page. I also voted to keep these redirect pages. I thought that if they were removed, then I would not automatically get to the pages I was looking for if I happened to type all lowercase letters, which would be pretty inconvenient. However, it turns out I was wrong. The software will automatically send someone to the appropriate page, even if they type all lowercase, and even if the redirect pages are deleted. It's just like a redirect, but without the redirect page. Deleting them will remove needless clutter in mainspace searches. With this knowledge, I wonder if you might consider changing your vote to delete. Thanks, and have a good day. Nick Graves 18:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the concern. However, I am already aware that the software will treat "WP:afd", "Wp:afd", and "wp:afd" the same. However, given the fact that these terms are used for linking, upon deletion they would become redlinks. I know this isn't a big deal to fix, but I don't feel the benefit of getting rid of these "unecessary but harmless" redirects outweighs the cost of repairing the redlinks that would ensue. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 18:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your assistance with the Timeline of STS-115 redirect. Now that I see how it was done, and why, I'll be sure to remember that in the future. I appreciate your assistance greatly. ^Ariel♥Gold 19:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) It certainly was no big deal to put it up on the AfD, no harm done there, and everyone gets to learn somehow. Happy to have helped though. Happy editing, ɑʀкʏɑɴ 20:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"bad" precedent?

How was the spirit, ie. allowing consensus to build, not followed? This article was given the same amount of time and opportunity for discussion that every other article on AfD is afforded. Putting this back up for discussion simply because the Maths wikiproject wasn't notified and didn't get to chime in causes harm in that it sets a bad precedent.

It would set a good precendent, not a bad one. I've now proposed at Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy that this particular "bad precedent" should become a general prescribed rule as common sense would suggest. If this case sets a new precedent that one should do that, then this case will have served a very good purpose that benefits Wikipedia in general. Michael Hardy 20:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are the editors who nominate an article for AfD supposed to figure out that the math WP might want to participate

That would be a good idea. Michael Hardy 20:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It mentions monkeys, does that mean we should have called WikiProject Primates in as well?

Could be. Use common sense. You're not supposed to be omniscient or infallible, but trying to approach completeness and correctness is a good idea. Then if some group is later found to have been left out that may have something useful to contribute, one can propose relisting. It's as if you tell someone who can improve an article: "You should have been here back when this article was being created. Since you weren't, we will now punish you by refusing to let you make the contributions from which we would all benefit if you made them." Michael Hardy 20:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see why you insist that a refusal to re-open a discussion equates to a punishment. Why the victim complex? It's merely a matter of being prudent - if we allow an article to be undeleted on a whim because someone says "I didn't have a chance to voice my opinion" then what is the point of having a deletion process at all? It's essentially providing Wikiprojects with carte blanche undelete powers over any article they deem to be within their "domain of expertise". For what it is worth, there is no prohibition to re-creating this article with encyclopedic content, and if someone in the Math wikiproject has the information and capability to do so there is nothing prohibiting them from doing so. Howerver I must ask the question - you keep implying that there is some "new information" upon which to improve this article but have thus far failed to indicate what that might be. Why haven't you shared this information with us? ɑʀкʏɑɴ 21:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one who framed it in those terms. I was responding to those who did. Someone said if Wikipedia's math community did not step in earlier, they should be excluded and that's their own problem. If the ambulance didn't arrive early enough to save one of the patients, then the ambulance should be punished by being prevented from arriving early enough to save the other one. Michael Hardy 23:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArkyBot suggestions

Hello,

My city was recently visited by ArkyBot, and I notice a couple of things that it could have done, but didn't. First, the page for the city contained a Template:coor dms, but ArkyBot didn't copy that into the infobox. That seems like a good idea to me. Second, you might want to add a constant timezone for each state you visit. Many, if not all states are on the same time zone throughout, and Colorado is one of them.

Thanks for listening! -- Ken g6 22:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions! I am currently working on the coordinates issue, I thought I had it fixed but apparently not! As some articles handle the coordinates differently it creates a little bit of a challenge regarding consistency, but I hopefully have a fix in the works. With regard to the time zones, I had initially ignored them because some states are split between time zones and it would be difficult for me to figure out which cities are on which side of the line, but you are right - many states are in just 1 time zone and at least for those states I could have it insert the timezone. I'll see what I can do. Thanks again for the ideas, and happy editing! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 22:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

City move request

Are you going to file the move request for the AP cities? (probably better you or Bobblehead or someone like that rather than me). --Serge 21:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual

Thanks for doing that. I thought I might be high up on the list and it's quite a nice feeling to know that I've contributed so much unusual stuff. It's nice to see who else is up there, but it's also nice to know that there have been so many different contributors that have started off UAs. violet/riga (t) 20:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

Just FYI, your signature *may* be problematic for some users (for example - color blind users). You may want to look at WP:SIG. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 23:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etuvluk River

Thanks for recreating a proper article. Short-circuiting discussion by improving the encyclopedia with a good stub is short circuiting at its very best. :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 05:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) I have to agree with - ahh, I can't remember who made the comment - that it was slightly silly to have so much discussion over what amounted to a six-word article, so it only seemed to make sense to dig up what info I could and try to find a sensible solution to the problem! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 19:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify

In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National delimitation in the Soviet Union you wrote " references given in the article are used correctly" It was me who added them. Please clarify your concern. `'Míkka 17:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I don't have access to those references, I am assuming that they are relevant to the topic. There is no way for me to know what those sources are actually about but I am assuming good faith and believing that whoever put them there did so because they are indeed relevant to the topic. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 17:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote in the AfD page, insides of these books are searchable online via amazon (so there *is* a way to know; if you don't know how it works, ask me), and the content indeed matched the article, even the term "national delimitation" is used, contrary to the nominator. `'Míkka 22:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, the mention in the AfD only made clear that the one reference could be searched, not all of them. In any case, my whole point was that even though I didn't know the contents of those books I was willing to take your word for it that they were pertinent to the article :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 22:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Dakota

Hey there, I already posted this exact thing on Ixnayonthetimmay's page because you both have worked with making county maps detailing and highlighting the incorporated and unincorporated communities that exist within (I've viewed the Los Angeles County and Maricopa County ones). I'm interested in doing this project for the 66 counties of South Dakota, but I need a little bit of help. I've found maps of some of the counties detailing the communities...but I wish to know what program you use or how you go about turning them into the SVG files that are displayed on Wikipedia. Basically, how can I turn this:[3] into something like this:[4]? If you could help me out, I'd be very grateful. Thanks a lot! -Jon, Sioux Falls —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coulraphobic123 (talk • contribs) 23:54, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

The program I use to create the files you are looking at is a custom-made program that interprets boundary files supplied by the US Census Bureau. The positive side to this is that I can generate the maps very quickly, but the downside is that all of the information is from the 2000 census and becomes outdated whenever city boundaries change, and the Census won't have new boundary files until 2010 :/ The best way to convert that PDF into what you are looking for would be to simply trace it with a drawing utility like Inkscape. If you are okay with the 2000 data, I could generate the maps for you based on Census information. Let me know! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 14:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well if it wouldn't be too much trouble, I actually would like that very much if you could generate the maps with the 2000 Census information. I understand the boundaries have changed since then but I don't so much mind that. How long would it take to do each county in the state? Of course since South Dakota has a very small population and low population density, none of them will be very complicated at all. Minnehaha (above) and perhaps Pennington (the second most populated in the state) would be about as complicated as you can get. So yeah if you could do that without it being too much of a burden, I'd appreciate it! If not, I'll try out the Inkscape thing. Thanks a lot! Coulraphobic123 17:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the whole state done it will take a little bit of time. I had Florida next on my to-do list but since I hadn't really gotten under way with it, I suppose I could sneak SD on the list for the next batch of maps :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 18:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to tell you thanks a lot, man. Everything looks great, I'm quite impressed! You're the shit. Peace —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.9.241.4 (talk) 17:33, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Guarani

Hello Arkyan, I do not speak Guarani, but I am fascinated with languages. I speak French pretty well (I am only 13, so I've got time to learn others!), and hope to learn other languages. Nerane'i means "peace" in Guarani; I found a list of words for "peace" in many languages, and I thought it was cool. Cheers, Neranei (talk) 21:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very, very welcome; would you like your talk page done as well? As for what you did to deserve it, you are undergoing an RfA, and I got bored. So, there you go! Cheers, Neranei (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Hello again Arkyan, I've made you a new user page design. If you want to take a look, go to my sandbox (there are some other projects in there, it is the 2nd one down.) I hope you like it; if you don't, by all means don't use it. Enjoy! Cheers, Neranei (talk) 00:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, congrats on your RfA! Good luck with adminship!

Neranei (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA was successful

Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. Good luck! And please archive your talk page. It's pretty hefty :-) --Deskana (apples) 17:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Politics rule 19:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Errr, you're right, it was a bit .. lengthy :) Fixed that up. And thanks for the well-wishing, will do my best not to make a mess! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 17:24, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

I forgot to congratulate you on your succesful RFA. Congratulations and happy editing--Pheonix15 19:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Lady of the United States

I agree with the proposal you made on the Second Lady of the United States AFD page to change the article's title as opposed to deleting the article entirely, however I also think that the questions raised regarding the article are applicable to the related, similarly-named category (Category:Second Ladies of the United States), which should probably be renamed along with the article although, I am not sure if we should wait until the AFD vote on the article is closed before initiating any action with respect to the category. --TommyBoy 19:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		Thanks...
	Thank you for showing your support for me in my recent RfA. Unfortunately, I was unable to earn the required consensus and did not succeed. I do hope to put in another request in a few months, once I have improved upon the concerns addressed by the rest of the participants. Your expressed trust in me will definitely help me reach that goal. Thank you again, and happy editing! *Hersfold* ^(t/a/c) 01:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. - Congrats on your RfA, by the way! Glad it worked out for you. :-) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		My RFA
		I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. Edison 14:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Warner (Canadian politician)

An article that you have commented on in a speedy deletion process, Mark Warner (Canadian politician), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Warner (Canadian politician). Thank you. 64.231.240.167 13:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tundra vandalism

Sure you won't reconsider? :-). There's been 17 edit/reverts just today --- I don't know why people like to vandalise this page. hike395 03:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I'll keep an eye on it. If it continues to be out of hand then I'll go ahead and sprotect the page. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		My RFA
		¡Hola! thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 51 supports, no opposes, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Florida County maps around Lake Okeechobee

I notice from your map of Florida that you include large bodies of water on the west coast such as Tampa Bay. Why not put Lake Okeechobee in. It's the second largest lake wholly within the US (After Lake Michigan. The boundaries of the surrounding counties all meet in a point in the center. Without showing the presence of the lake, this creates some bizarre (to residents of the area) looking maps. Martin County, Florida. for instance has a fairly rectangular land shape. Adding the cone on the west side makes it look really strange. Also you deleted the disamb header I had in Stuart, Florida. I shortened it and put it back in. The article has been cloeaned up by deleting lots of stuff that belonged in articles on the County or other cities or places in the county, even some in adjoining counties. clariosophic 20:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The maps are auto-generated using US Census data which unfortunately does not include the borders for Lake Okeechobee. I agree they would look better with them - but they will have to be custom modified. I will make a note to revisit them when I get a chance and see if I can make them look any better. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 20:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm giving you the image of a spinning washer used in conjunction with a tie rod

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For taking the City/County Mapmaking project to such a thorough and complete conclusion by automating the process and keeping up with it the whole way through. I must say, very good work! Ixnayonthetimmay 01:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plantation, Florida

Don't try to make it into a disambiguation page. The vast majority of people looking for Plantation, Florida are looking for the page it's on. Not Plantation Key/Not a Census Designated place on the other side of the state. That's why those are at Plantation, Florida (disambiguation). It's hard work moving these things around. Cary Bass ^demandez 20:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist. Your reasoning is entirely subjective but not worth getting into an argument over. Cheers, ɑʀкʏɑɴ 21:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arkybot linking to dab page

Arkybot is currently linking many articles to [[Georgia]] when it should be linking to [[Georgia (U.S. state)]]. Please can you stop it and fix the incorrect links it has inserted. Thanks. DuncanHill 23:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, that's my fault! I'll get on a fix for that as soon as I can - I keep forgetting that Georgia is a disambiguation page. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 02:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! DuncanHill 12:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's still doing it - in the "map caption" section of the infobox. DuncanHill 15:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Is there anywhere else you see it messing up the links? ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not as far as I know (though I don't know if any other states have a similar situation).DuncanHill 15:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks so much for bringing this to my attention, I'd never have caught it. I'll make sure to check on the dab status of other state names before proceeding with them. The problem should now be under control :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nice infobox by the way! DuncanHill 16:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The now-traditional RFA thank-spam

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dear Shereth,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to Walton^One and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.

iridescent (talk to me!) 20:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

This design was ~~brazenly stolen from~~ inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

bot?

Hi Arkyan, just wanted to let you know that I had responded to your message on my talkpage, and I think that a new one with AfD functionality would be superb. I emailed Dragons flight offwiki, apologetic and asking about the bot, not surprisingly no response. Do you have a prototype to get off the ground? ~Eliz81 ^(C) 21:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll see about doing a test run for it tomorrow :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 02:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Arkyan this looks great! Sorry I missed your post on my talk page. I say make it official :) Also, if this gets the green light, maybe the specialized AfD trackers could be a go too? I know I'm so ambitious. Thanks for working on this. ~Eliz81^(C) 05:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sure. Next step is getting approval from the BAG, but I don't think that'll be a problem. I'll keep you updated, and see what I can do about the alternative AfD trackers. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yeah, since the bot is merely summarizing information and not changing the mainspace or projectspace, it should be fairly straightforward. I've so missed the summaries. With this bot back in business, it will make AfD participation easier for the regulars! :) ~Eliz81^(C) 00:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Woohoo! Approved for trial! :) ~Eliz81 ^(C) 23:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Yup :) The test runs should begin tomorrow. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 02:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Looks great! Suggestions on the AFD summary talk page. ~Eliz81 ^(C) 02:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Inactivity check and news report

Hello, Arkyan. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:

Please update your information at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
There are important discussions taking place at WT:USRD relating to whether WP:USRD, WP:HWY, or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 23:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Risk management

I noticed you closed the associated AFD with delete, but didn't delete the article. Whatup with that? ;-) /Blaxthos 12:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was Risk communication that I closed as delete, and remade it into a redirect to risk management :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 02:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea. ;-) /Blaxthos 00:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help a guy out?

Hi. I found you listed at Wikipedia:Translators_available#Spanish-to-English, and you're the first still-active fluent Spanish speaker I found. :) There's a probably Argentinian user requesting assistance at Talk:Bella Vista, Tucumán. (When I first stumbled upon the article, it was tagged for deletion as nonsense. I removed the speedy, noted some necessary improvements and listed it at clean-up.) He is the article's author and seems to want to make the improvements but is apparently concerned about his poor English. If you can help him, I'd appreciate it. If not, I may pointer him to Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina. I'd do that now, but I'm not sure he's familiar enough with the environment to navigate the process. --Moonriddengirl 18:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll see what I can do :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 18:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) I'd help him if I could, but my Spanish is limited to about three phrases. --Moonriddengirl 18:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!!

Congratulations! Your image Image:Pasco County Florida Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Odessa Highlighted.svg was the random picture of the day for September 30, 2007. It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

Pasco County, Florida highlighted in Florida, incorporated and unincorporated areas shown, Odessa highlighted

Image credit: Arkyan (talk · contribs)

. Again, Congratulations! - Presidentman 17:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lowndes County, Georgia

Love the new images you've created, but question on Image:Lowndes County Georgia Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Valdosta Highlighted.svg what is the clear polygon in the NorthWest part of the county? There is no city there. --Mjrmtg 19:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean northeast of Valdosta? The clear polygon is the Moody AFB census-designated place, a part of the base that the Census defines as a specific place for demographic purposes. All of the maps I have created are based on Census information and show incorporated cities as well as Census designated places. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 14:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is the area. Thanks for clearing that up :) --Mjrmtg 15:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the Tift County map highlighting Tifton - What are the lines running south of Tifton that then connect? --Mjrmtg 16:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These would be the CDP boundaries for Unionville and Phillipsburg. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 16:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those silly CDP area - thanks :) --Mjrmtg 17:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I tagged that page, um I would have thought those pages should be part of your user page not on the main article namespace. Correct me if I'm wrong. I would prefer a response on my talk if that's alright? Thanks. Phgao 17:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page is [5], I think it should be here instead [6]. Phgao 17:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, you're right - I left off the "User". My bad, I'll fix it. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 17:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems! See you around! Phgao 18:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bearian

Thank you for supporting my successful RfA, which passed 63 to 1, especially for conveniently forgetting getting upset at me in others editors' RfA's and some AfD's. Thank you for your confidence. Bearian 21:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV you might be interested in

Hello Arkyan, you might be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Kurdish-Israeli relations. I'm sending a short note to people who were involved in this debate and a related debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish-Chinese relations, to allow for maximum consensus. It would be great if you could review my deletion decision and make comments accordingly. Thanks! - Ta bu shi da yu 23:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando, FL, MSA request

I don't know if you take requests, but I had one. I've been babysitting (best way I can find to describe it) the Orlando-Kissimmee, Florida, Metropolitan Statistical Area page, and I was looking for somebody that could make a map that would highlight it, and maybe have a secondary highlight for the wider Orlando-Deltona-Daytona Beach Combined Statistical Area. The picture on the page right now sucks. Do you think you could do that, please? Thanks either way. --Kitch ^{(Talk : Contrib)} 01:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nearly finished with my maps for Georgia counties. As soon as I finish up that batch, I'll see about putting together a quick map for you. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 04:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Awesome! You rock. :) --Kitch ^{(Talk : Contrib)} 02:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is this about what you were wanting? ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's perfect! I'm adding it to the article now. --Kitch ^{(Talk : Contrib)} 14:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes!

I saw your comment on the "proposed" South Mountain Freeway at azcentral.com. It was neat to see a name I recognized. You're totally right, Ahwatukee needs to stop whining already, the freeway has been in plans since the mid-80s, it would relieve a lot of congestion on the I-10 and other valley freeways, it would actually make THEIR commutes easier and give local businesses new growth opportunities... but that's what you get when you try to do anything in Ahwatukee. That's why they scrapped the Paradise Parkway along Bethany Home (still very much needed) years back, "neighborhood opposition" -- i.e., rich WASP families don't want a freeway near THEM... they want it near the low-income Mexicans instead. If only everyone else who is tired of waiting in traffic on the I 10 between Pecos and 51st Ave. could veto their opinions and make them be quiet. I just hope that no other planned freeways face opposition like this, we are already playing a game of catch up when it comes to our transporation infrastructure and people whining like that is setting us back years and years (that freeway could be almost finished by now if those people had just shut up at the beginning). Arizona State Route 202 --Node 03:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Well I have to say that's the first time someone (who I did not already know otherwise) has connected me here on Wikipedia to .. well .. somewhere else. Yeah, if there was any doubt that was indeed myself who made that post over on azcentral. I couldn't agree with you more though - Ahwatukee is full of a bunch of people who moved there because they wanted the view of the mountainside and then threw a fit when someone builds a bigger home next to theirs and blocks the "view". People only want things that are convenient to them but as soon as there is something they don't like, well, it's off to city council to protest! Unfortunately I would be willing to bet that future freeways will face just as much opposition. The only reason the 303 is going smoothly is because all the right of way was already bought up and they actually did it right there, planning wise. Hmm. Perhaps people could take a clue :) ɑʀкʏɑɴ 04:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that there will be that much trouble with the other freeways already planned up to 2025 in the Regional Transportation Plan. Working-class families in Avondale seem unlikely to protest the 801, and much of the 802 will be going through farmland (besides, they have signs on the roads that say "site of future Williams Gateway Freeway", so I would hope people are more aware than in Ahwatukee). On the other hand, one should never underestimate people's ability to whhhhhiiiiiine. --Node 17:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My recent RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 01:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArkyBot

Hi Arkyan, thanks for all the great maps, they look fantastic. I've been running the CapitalBot for the last few days to add all of the infoboxes too, and expect to finish all states by around Monday. I'm pretty sure that our two bots are using the same database info, so all of the info that your bot adds will mostly have been added by the one I've been running already. I think a great modification to your bot would be to fully automate it (which would save you time) and to make it just upload and insert the maps (which is fairly straightforward, so I think full automation would be easy). Thus we could get all the maps standardized and uploaded really fast, and you wouldn't have to waste time going through all of the infoboxes again. What do you think? Or if you were willing to share your code I could modify my bot to help with the maps.

Also, I noticed that the ArkyBot has been producing very wacky infobox text for the last day or two (mostly from pages my bot has already visited). Take a look at the text from Winchester, Idaho for an example (shown below). Note that the comments are all messed up and are being placed on the wrong lines. Also, you seem to be doubling lots of comments (for example there are two comments about maps, images, location, area, and population, and not all next to one another). Also, the equal signs seem to have gone haywire. I also think that we could do without the majority of the extra parameters you're adding in most pages, as they will rarely be used. Basically, what you could do, since my bot has already added all of the information that your bot is adding (except the maps), is if the page contains a FIPS code or GNIS id, then my bot has seen it, and you could just do the map; otherwise you could add the entire infobox. I think that will keep the problems with formatting down and will vastly speed up your work.

Anyways, I don't mean to step on your toes, I just thought we could figure out a more efficient way to get all the infoboxes looking right, containing maps, and having their code format not look quite so strange. Let me know what you think. --CapitalR 05:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Infobox City
<!--See the Table at Infobox Settlement for all fields and descriptions of usage-->
<!-- Basic info  ---------------->
|official_name            = Winchester, Idaho
|other_name             =
|native_name            =  <!-- for cities whose native name is not in English -->
|nickname                 =
|settlement_type          = [[City]]
|motto                    =<!-- Images -->
<!-- images and maps  ----------->
|image_skyline            =
|imagesize                =
|image_caption            =
|image_flag               =
|flag_size              =
|image_seal               =<!-- Maps -->
|seal_size              =
|image_shield           = 
|shield_size            =
|image_blank_emblem     =
|blank_emblem_type      =
|blank_emblem_size      =
|image_map = Lewis_County_Idaho_Incorporated_and_Unincorporated_areas_Winchester_Highlighted.svg

|mapsize =
|map_caption = Location in [[Lewis County, Idaho|Lewis County]] and the state of [[Idaho]]
|image_map1               =
|mapsize1                 =
|map_caption1             =<!-- Location -->
|image_dot_map          =
|dot_mapsize            =
|dot_map_caption        =
|dot_x =  
|dot_y =
|pushpin_map            = <!-- the name of a location map as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Location_map -->
|pushpin_label_position = <!-- the position of the pushpin label: left, right, top, bottom, none -->
|pushpin_map_caption    =
|pushpin_mapsize        =
<!-- Location ------------------>
|subdivision_type         = [[List of countries|Country]]
|subdivision_name         = [[United States]]
|subdivision_type1        = [[Political divisions of the United States|State]]
|subdivision_name1 = [[Idaho]]
|subdivision_type2        = [[List of counties in Idaho|County]]
|subdivision_name2        = [[Lewis County, Idaho|Lewis]]
|subdivision_type3      = 
|subdivision_name3      = 
|subdivision_type4      = 
|subdivision_name4      =
<!-- Politics ----------------->
|government_footnotes     =
|government_type          =
|leader_title             =
|leader_name              =
|leader_title1            =
|leader_name1             =
|leader_title2          =
|leader_name2           =
|leader_title3          =
|leader_name3           =
|leader_title4          =
|leader_name4           =
|established_title        =
|established_date         =<!-- Area -->
|established_title2     =  <!-- Incorporated (town) -->
|established_date2      = 
|established_title3     =  <!-- Incorporated (city) -->
|established_date3      =
<!-- Area    --------------------->
|area_magnitude           =
|unit_pref                = <!--Enter: Imperial, if Imperial (metric) is desired-->
|area_footnotes           =
|area_total_km2           = 0.5
|area_land_km2            = 0.5
|area_water_km2           = 0.0
|area_total_sq_mi         = 0.2
|area_land_sq_mi          = 0.2
|area_water_sq_mi         = 0.0<!-- Population -->
|area_water_percent       =
|area_urban_km2           =
|area_urban_sq_mi         =
|area_metro_km2           =
|area_metro_sq_mi         =
|area_blank1_title        =
|area_blank1_km2          =
|area_blank1_sq_mi        =
<!-- Population   ----------------------->
|population_as_of         = [[United States Census, 2000|2000]]
|population_footnotes     =
|population_note                =
|population_total         = 308
|population_density_km2   = 656.3
|population_density_sq_mi = 1699.8<!-- General information -->
|population_metro               =
|population_density_metro_km2   =
|population_density_metro_sq_mi =
|population_urban               =
|population_density_urban_km2   =
|population_density_urban_sq_mi =
|population_blank1_title        =
|population_blank1              =
|population_density_blank1_km2 =   
|population_density_blank1_sq_mi =
<!-- General information  --------------->
|timezone                 = [[Pacific Time Zone|Pacific (PST)]]
|utc_offset               = -8
|timezone_DST             = PDT
|utc_offset_DST           = -7
|latd = 46 
|latm = 14 
|lats = 27 
|latNS = N
|longd = 116 
|longm = 37 
|longs = 24 
|longEW = W<!-- Area/postal codes & others -->
|elevation_footnotes      =
|elevation_m              = 1213
|elevation_ft             = 3980
<!-- Area/postal codes & others -------->
|postal_code_type         = [[ZIP code]]
|postal_code              = 83555
|area_code                = [[Area code 208|208]]
|blank_name               = [[Federal Information Processing Standard|FIPS code]]
|blank_info               = 16-87850
|blank1_name              = [[Geographic Names Information System|GNIS]] feature ID
|blank1_info              = 0375955
|website                  =
|footnotes                =
}}

Thanks for the notes and suggestions. I didn't realize you were running a bot to get all of these fixed up - that's great! The main reason that I had thus far been unwilling to fully automate the bot is because I kept running in to little infobox issues here and there, and I do like to review the maps for accuracy. However, if you're going to be done with the infoboxes by Monday, I think I can modify my bot to ignore infoboxes and instead just focus on the maps. I know that can be done pretty fool-proof, and I can fairly safely set that to a fully automated task and get them done a lot quicker.

As far as the wacky infobox comments, that's my fault. I had also been using the bot to help get rid of some deprecated infobox tags, but that project has already been completed by ... ahh I can't remember who. In any case, the infobox comments aren't usually used when someone puts the box in manually so my bot wasn't expecting to see any, and I suppose the fact that your bot put them in kind of throws it off.

I'll rework my code to skip infobox processing and focus just on maps replacement, and then I can probably go ahead and mostly automate it. The map generation process, itself, is mostly automatic but does require a little bit of manual oversight so that's likely to become the limiting factor but things will still be rather sped up. Thanks! ɑʀкʏɑɴ 14:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent maps

Excellent job with those USA cities. --Emijrp 10:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me second this. I saw the new map on Grand Rapids, Minnesota. Very nice. kmccoy (talk) 21:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may need your help

I need your help on another article to be saved from deletion: Thomas M. Jacobs. You assisted me on the Bruce Haslingden article back in April. I may need to call you when I need it. Chris 21:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for voting on my RFA! Although ultimately it was unsuccessful, I do appreciate the feedback. I can completely understand as to why you would be distrusting of me given the many conflicts I have been them (a few of which I admittedly handled very badly), but hopefully if I ever decide to run again I will have distanced myself enough from these (by experience) to gain your support - so thank you again for the feedback and I look forward to seeing you around WP!--daniel folsom 22:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Category: Wikipedians

I think the very fact that it doesn't get traffic seems to justify its deletion or overhaul. Consider; which would receive more vocal opposition... the nomination of the main page of Wikipedia for deletion, or the nomination of Category:Wikipedians for deletion/overhaul, something that unless there were a group of people who used the user categories actively, they would know nothing about? Yet I will take your idea into account all the same.--WaltCip 22:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus, Georgia

Hi Arkyan... Could you take a look at the map image in the infobox for Columbus, Georgia? I believe there may be something wrong with the image as it does not seem to show properly, at least for me using IE6. It is simply blank both in the infobox and on the image page itsself. Thanks! Steevo714 02:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right! I'll take a look at it today and see what I can do about it. Thanks for letting me know. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 13:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]