User talk:Sheppane
2
Image copyright problem with File:Bluebird K7 on January 4 1967.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bluebird K7 on January 4 1967.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Bluebird K7 January 4 1967.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Bluebird K7 January 4 1967.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
This is an image which I bought from the personal collection of one of Donald Campbell's team members. I have reduced the size of the image and am happy to share it here. It has not been sourced from the internet, and has not been published elsewhere. It is not a press picture and my understanding on purchase is that the copyright was transfered to me.
Possibly unfree File:Bluebird Crest.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Bluebird Crest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I created this work entirely by myself. The picture was taken by myself of a pair of Bluebird team overalls in 2001. I own the copyright of all sizes of this image but am happy to share this reduced size example.
License tagging for File:Bluebird K7 at high speed.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bluebird K7 at high speed.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Bluebird K7.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bluebird K7.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:K7 infinity logo.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:K7 infinity logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 23:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bluebird K7 at high speed.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Bluebird K7 at high speed.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Bluebird K7.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Bluebird K7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Image copyright issues
[edit]Please stop spamming my talk page. I've already answered and repeating your claims isn't helping any. If you have more questions, please take them to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Eeekster (talk) 00:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
April 2013
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Donald Campbell. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. C'mon guys, sort this out and stop the revert war. Talk:Donald Campbell awaits. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring continued
[edit]Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
ANEW
[edit]Please contribute to a discussion I've begun on Factzombie's talk page. Bear in mind that if you do not contribute, you risk being blocked for edit warring.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 22:14, 5 May 2013 (UTC)April 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Donald Campbell without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why remove the image? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I was wanting to add to this article from a 1960s source and noticed you added a large amount of prose relating to salt conditions, engine power, construction, etc in 2010 and "there can be no doubt that CN7 would have set a record well in excess of 450 mph and perhaps close to her design maximum of 500 mph, a speed that no other wheel driven car has approached". What was the basis for these statements, please? Can you add any published reliable-source? The latter particularly seems like opinion, not attributed to any author; was all the material you added from the book mentioned? It is unclear, not being used as a citation? (...John Pearson to chronicle this attempt, with the resultant critically acclaimed book Bluebird and the Dead Lake, published by Collins in 1965). Thanks.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 19:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Sheppane, I reverted a text addition you made to this article in 2013 because it appears to have introduced copyvio from this account; however, from your user page it appears you may be the author of that text? If you are still reading here, could you clarify the situation? If you are indeed the author and are willing to sign over the text as copyright-free, we can use it, but I believe it would need to be rewritten for tone and to fix some typos. And it should be footnoted to that page, which I assume was its first publication? I've also left a note at the article talk page. Yngvadottir (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2017 (UTC)