User talk:Shepherd110

Welcome!

Hello, Shepherd110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your addition to Anglican Diocese of Belize has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. The material appears to be substantially taken from: https://sites.google.com/site/dioceseofbelizecpwi/about-the-diocese. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shepherd110, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Shepherd110! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaw Mudge & Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IFF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaw mudge award

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shaw mudge award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw Mudge

I have taken a pass through your article on Shaw Mudge and made some fairly dramatic cleanup edits. The issues that I attempted to address are:

Citations should actually verify the facts which they cite. Peppering an article with citations that say nothing about the subject of the article does not help.
Information about the subject's relatives (such as his father's dogs appearing in a photo with Babe Ruth) are meaningless. They are cute stories to be told among the family, but are not the stuff of encyclopedias.
In general, Wikipedia is not a memorial site; material should be written in an encyclopedic tone, not in the tone of an elegy or eulogy.
Citations must be made to publicly available texts. Notes collected in preparation for writing an obituary are not a valid source, nor are personal reflections of the subjects friends or colleagues.

Please keep these points in mind as you continue to write at Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A further note, as your more recent edits may indicate that my points have not been understood:

A reference to "Remarks made in Washington, D.C. to the staff and Board members of NSBU" is not valid, because neither I nor any other Wikipedia editor can access these remarks to use them to verify any contents of the article.
The same goes for "Shaw Mudge Voluntary Civic Activities, December 7, 1994, distributed by Shaw Mudge"

Please restrict yourself to source that are publicly available and can therefore be verified by independent editors. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I have had to remove the obituary are a citation for many facts in your article. If a fact is not stated in a reference, do not use that reference to cite that fact. If you are having trouble understanding this principle, please engage in a dicsussion (either here, on my talk page or on the article talk page). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaw Mudge & Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaw Mudge & Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaw Mudge & Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shaw Mudge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

classified/paid-notice-deaths-mudge-shaw.html Shaw Mudge Obituary, New York Times, January 26, 2001]</ref> and appointed delegate of U.S. Senator Lowell Weicker),<ref name=Activities/><ref name=obit/>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shaw Mudge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Digital Archives correspondence relating to the subject, U.S. Senator John Heinz, 24 April 1985]]</ref><ref>[http://digitalcollections.library.cmu.edu/portal/main.jsp?flag=browse&smd=1&awdid=4 cmu.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shepherd110. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shepherd110. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]