User talk:Shenaw2016

Welcome!

Hello, Shenaw2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Sorry, I had to revert your changes to Sacred Heart. Please familiarize yourself first with how Wikipedia works. Fact, and only fact, relying on mentioned independent sources. After learning, please make small edits first. I'm always sorry when I have to undo the efforts of someone with good intentions, so please conform with the guidelines. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm a newbie. I've done the online guided tour. I added some sections to an article but it was removed. Here's the information I received: "Sorry, I had to revert your changes to Sacred Heart. Please familiarize yourself first with how Wikipedia works. Fact, and only fact, relying on mentioned independent sources. After learning, please make small edits first. I'm always sorry when I have to undo the efforts of someone with good intentions, so please conform with the guidelines. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)"

I think I've done what she mentioned. The only thing was I did not make small edits first.

Please help me with getting my article posted.

Shenaw2016 (talk) 11:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've asked this in a few places, and have been answered. Please only use one method of seeking assistance. 331dot (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Heart

I suggest we go in small portions, because - as said above - someone confronted with 10 edits of complex changes with obvious formatting errors will go the easy way and revert it all.

Please tell me here what you want to add to the article, with formatted references, and begin with just one fact, supported by one reference. I'll look and comment. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Enthronement of the Sacred Heart of Jesus

Act of Enthroning the Sacred Heart in a Home or Other Place

The Enthronement is placing an image of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in a place of honor in the home after a time of prayerful preparation.^[1]Shenaw2016 (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Shenaw2016! You created a thread called Newbie's first article was removed at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Shenaw2016! You created a thread called Does Wikibooks have it's own Teahouse? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart Enthronement Network (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shenaw2016! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart Enthronement Network (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart Enthronement Network (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Missing lead section

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Heart Enthronement Network (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The practice of enthroning the Sacred Heart of Jesus itself seems to be given significant coverage by the sources present. However, the same cannot be said about the network.

I fail to see how the coverage here satisfies WP:ORGDEPTH. The organization's founding is dated in this article as 2015; while there are five offline sources, two of them predate this and are extremely unlikely to describe this network. A third, while it's published by Notre Dame's Catholic press, is written by Emily Jaminet and thus can't be independent. Likewise, Emily Jaminet's writings in Word on Fire can't be considered to be independent. Sacred Heart Missionary talks fails WP:V unless these talks exist in some form of recording thereof (see the published sources information page for more info around that), and thus wouldn't contribute towards notability.

Of the online sources:

The piece in The Catholic Herald does not mention the network in-depth;
Catholic Times piece #1 reads almost like an advertisement and it makes me skeptical that there's independence between the Catholic diocesan newspaper and the network;
Catholic Times piece #2 contains maybe four sentences that could WP:ORGIND that are related to the network and is thus not in-depth even if the newspaper were independent;
Emily Jaminet's piece in National Catholic Reporter is plainly not independent of the network;
;
Catholic Free Press doesn't mention the network itself, so it doesn't contribute towards notability;

In short, the network itself fails to meet WP:ORGCRIT based off of the coverage currently in the article. It appears to be the case that an article on Sacred Heart enthronement would pass WP:GNG based on the sources present, but it doesn't appear that this particular organization passes the guideline based on the sources present.

My advice would be to create an article on the practice of enthronement itself (I can't find one), if you'd like to re-use some of the content already here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Shenaw2016. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Mhawk10

Hello, Shenaw2016. You have new messages at Mhawk10's talk page.
Message added 02:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Mhawk10 (talk) 02:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Mhawk10

Hello, Shenaw2016. You have new messages at Mhawk10's talk page.
Message added 20:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Mhawk10 (talk) 20:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network

Hello, Shenaw2016. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sacred Heart Enthronement Network, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Larkin SS.CC., Rev. Francis (1999). [None Enthronement of the Sacred Heart]. National Sacred Heart Enthronement Center. p. 7. ISBN 0-8198-05330-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help); Check |url= value (help)

[1] Larkin SS.CC., Rev. Francis (1999). [None Enthronement of the Sacred Heart]. National Sacred Heart Enthronement Center. p. 7. ISBN 0-8198-05330-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help); Check |url= value (help)

[1]