User talk:Shawneebelle

Welcome to Wikipedia! You should probably read about our bedrock NPOV policy. Toby Bartels 15:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SESAC

I hope that you like the look of SESAC now. You can keep correcting it, but be careful about conflict of interest; it's usually better to add new material rather than to remove old stuff.

I've added requests for citation/verification/documentation a couple of places in the article. One of them is for a statement that you seemed not to like; so if nobody can come up with a citation in a couple of months, then I too would remove it. On the other hand, one is for a list that you added! Is there a list of SESAC-represented artists on the SESAC website? (I couldn't find one.) That would be ideal; you can add a link to it, like the other links that I added to cite facts on the page. —Toby Bartels 01:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to SESAC appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from SESAC. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to SESAC, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Closedmouth (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SESAC with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 15:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary block

You have been told before that SESAC does not control the Wikipedia page on SESAC. I have blocked your account for 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. When this block expires, you may edit SESAC and other pages again, but you must do so with the understanding that you are collaborating with other people on writing a neutral encyclopedia article. Please also review the policy on conflict of interest. —Toby Bartels (talk) 17:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]