User talk:Shaun3559

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Voice UK (series 1). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It appears that you have added a link to an image on an external website to Tulisa Contostavlos, likely in an attempt to display that image on the page. For technical and policy reasons, it is not possible to use images from external websites on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you.--5 albert square (talk) 12:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Sam Bailey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sam Bailey was changed by Shaun3559 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953335 on 2014-01-06T10:25:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Michelle Collins.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle Collins.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:X factor tca 2013 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:X factor tca 2013 l.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Simon cowell1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Simon cowell1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. January (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Simon cowell.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Simon cowell.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. January (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sam bailey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sam bailey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Louis Walshxfactor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Louis Walshxfactor.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the image policies

Hi There. I've just deleted File:LouisWalshXFACTORLAUNCH.jpg as it is a for-sale press image of a living person. Wikipedia does NOT host such images. Please pay attention to the fact the every image you have uploaded has been deleted. You clearly don't understand image policies here and need to before uploading more images. - Peripitus (Talk) 22:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Shaun3559 (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Cheryl Cole page has not change the actual file name to Cheryl Fernandez -Versini. She has recently got married again and would previous not like to be called Cheryl Cole because that her ex husband name (Ashely Cole) he cheated on her several time they divorce couple of years ago. So she would like to called Cheryl Fernandez -Versini

Hi, you will be able to carry out this mvoe yourself by clicking the "move" option located near the top of the article. Under here you will be able to rename the article to the individuals new name. However if someone then moves it back you will need to start a discussion on the talk page to gain consesnus for or against the move. It might be worth stating on the talk page why you are going to move the page before you do so so that editors are aware of your reasons. You can then also link to a reliable source to confirm the change of name to back up the change of article. Amortias (T)(C) 22:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shaun3559. The change you want was discussed on Talk:Cheryl Cole, and there was an overwhelming consensus NOT to make that change. The reason was that people still predominantly call her "Cheryl Cole". There are some people on the talk page who think the page should be titled just "Cheryl". If you want to participate in the discussion, go to Talk:Cheryl Cole. —teb728 t c 10:57, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trying Hard award is given to the people who re-submit an entry for something.

	Trying Hard
	Nice ajob Wafzal The First (talk) 22:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cheryl Cole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 02:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I technically disagree with characterizing the name change as vandalism, but it was an edit against consensus and it was a disruptive edit. Shaun3559: Posting the same request at the WP: Help Desk again after it has been answered is not constructive and will annoy other editors. The name used for the singer is contentious and should be addressed via Wikipedia's consensus process. Editing against consensus can result in being blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shaun3559. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]