User talk:Sharon Cawley

I've added a discussion here about the Kelly Kettle redirect. Share your thoughts there. Thanks! --Porqin (talk) 13:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelly kettle

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kelly kettle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kelly kettle

A tag has been placed on Kelly kettle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kelly kettle

A tag has been placed on Kelly kettle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 15:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Kelly kettle, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You must not recreate pages after they have been deleted. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, Kelly kettle. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide a reasoning of why it should remain on the article's talk page. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kelly kettle - protected

Because the kelly kettle and volcano kettle are brand names, they do not merit their own page. I do not support this. The item is made by several manufacturers and a brand-name page is thought of as not more than an advert and not appropriate for wikipedia. I think it would be better to have kelly kettle redirected to the storm kettle page, which is how it was. If you really really think kelly kettle deserves a page, you could create a "kelly kettle company" article, but it also may be nominated for speedy deletion. I had originally combined a seperate article on the "thermette" in storm kettle because it is a similar device.

In some countries, some brand names have become generized, e.g., aspirin, thermos, xerox, whilst in others they are still brand names. Even so, I suspect that kelly kettle and ghillie kettle are being used this way even if the brand name is trademarked. --Fremte (talk) 18:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]