User talk:Shanklin1914

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shanklin1914 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is an unfair use of Wikipedia., and arises out of a desire by some to want to close down compromise editing of articles and talk pages. Those suggesting it are in my view guilty of Bullying Tactics, Edit Warring, Gaming, and POV Railroad. The article on the James Bond Film, SPECTRE, has been dominated by two very aggressive editors who feel that the article and even the subject belongs to them! They have even cut off discussion on the talk page, let alone the article itself. Please investigate this, for which I will be very grateful. Shanklin1914 (talk) 5:24 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shanklin1914 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This unblock review is unsatisfactory. If the reasons stated above having nothing to do with why I have been blocked, then why was I? I think I deserve a more satisfactory explanation.

Decline reason:

WP:DUCK sockpuppetry. Repeat unblock requests that do not address the reason for your block may result in loss of your ability to edit this talk page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked because you are a sockpuppet of Pitcroft. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your evidence please? – Shanklin1914 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the block template. The wording "Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked." is in bold near the top. - – SchroCat (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Will do so when block removed. – Shanklin1914 (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]