User talk:Shamimanm

Welcome!

Hello, Shamimanm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shamim Azad ANM, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Infobox person | name = Shamim Azad | birth_place = Shahjahanpur, India | occupation = Theatre Director

Personal life

He has 1 son and 1 daughter Bobby and Dolly

Major directions

Vijay tendulkar 's Jaati hi pucho sadhu ki
Bhanu Bharti's Katha kahi ek jale ped ne
Basant sabnish's Saiyan bhaye kotvaal
Bhanu Bharti’s Naachni

October 2014

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shamim azad anm

A tag has been placed on Shamim azad anm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 220 of ^Borg 07:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gurjar Andolan

Hello Shamimanm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gurjar Andolan for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LS1979 (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Your recent edit to Powayan appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 11:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Shahjahanpur. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 10:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shahjahanpur. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 20:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can provide reliable sources covering this person, he should not be listed in Wikipedia. As this is not your first account, you should be well aware of WP:LISTPEOPLE at this point. Continually adding this person is getting very disruptive and will likely end with blocks if you do not stop. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 21:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Your recent edit to Powayan appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 01:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahjahanpur Rang Mahotsav

A tag has been placed on Shahjahanpur Rang Mahotsav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSK (t • c) 06:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sapan Manchanda

The article Sapan Manchanda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unotable journalist with very few refs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shamim Azad (Actor)

A tag has been placed on Shamim Azad (Actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WordSeventeen (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadh Orhan

A tag has been placed on Sadh Orhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 09:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Hira Thind[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amrit Maan

A tag has been placed on Amrit Maan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 06:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hira Thind— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 February 12, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Thind. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 12:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Thind. Wikipedia is not an avenue for self promotion. We have been very patient despite your constant attempts to do so anyway. Please stop or you will be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 13:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadh Orhan filmography

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sadh Orhan filmography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 13:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nihal Thind

A tag has been placed on Nihal Thind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. সাজিদ রেজা করিম 07:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Main Teri Tu Mera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor reference - gackhollywood.com

Hi there, please don't add poor references to articles as you've done here and here. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and clear editorial policies' have to say about any given subject. That would be mainstream magazines, newspapers, news websites, and so on. Faceless blogs like gackhollywood.com, which anyone can set up in a matter of minutes, are insufficient and look an awful lot like you are introducing spam links. You really should familiarize yourself with our reliable sources guidelines. I notice there are at least two links on your talk page to this very important information page. Please note also that articles about living people must be impeccably sourced. We shouldn't be adding or changing birthdates as you did here unless we have a reliable source to support the information. The publication of birthdates can constitute a privacy violation. Please see WP:BLPPRIVACY. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFF and poor referencing

Hi there, when you create articles on films, the basic requirement per WP:NFF is that you need to establish with reliable published sources that principal photography has begun. From the guideline:

Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun.

If you fail to properly establish the film's notability, you force other editors to convert the article to a redirect, or to ask that the article be deleted. If you care about the film articles you are writing, you can't ignore this step.

Additionally, some of the references you've been using are really poor, like at Main Teri Tu Mera (which has now been redirected to Ksshitij Chaudhary) the article was entirely sourced to blogs.[1][2][3] We don't do this at Wikipedia. Per our guidelines on reliable sources, we only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and clear editorial policies have to say about any given subject. That means mainstream magazines, newspapers, long-standing reputable news websites, and other well-known and respected resources run by people who went to school and studied journalism. Anyone can create a blog and proclaim themselves an expert on a subject, and nobody goes to school to become a blogger. The inclusion of these references is woefully inadequate and the result will be: 1) the poor references will be removed and 2) the articles you write are likely to wind up deleted. If you want these articles to survive, please observe WP:NFF and please only submit quality references. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yamini Malhotra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yamini Malhotra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamini Malhotra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Shahjahanpur Rang Mahotsav

added links pointing to Script, Coordination and Make Up

Sadh Orhan

added a link pointing to Zakir Husain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aron Mitr

A tag has been placed on Aron Mitr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sismarinho (talk) 08:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aron Mitr, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Director and Lakhimpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Krishna Kumar Srivastava) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Krishna Kumar Srivastava, Shamimanm!

Wikipedia editor Fitindia just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Fitindia's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Aron Mitr

The article Aron Mitr has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aron Mitr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aron Mitr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aron Mitr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sismarinho (talk) 19:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi there, your seemingly confused edit summary here, "Why...????" in response to someone nominating Aron Mitr for deletion, seems very out of place to me. If you're confused why someone would nominate that article for deletion, two reasons might be: 1) you didn't bother to include more than one sentence--it's not much of an encyclopedia article, 2) you did nothing to establish the subject's notability. All article subjects must be notable, because otherwise every random person in the world would want to build a vanity Wikipedia article about themselves. Please familiarize yourself with our notability criteria. In this case, either the General Notability Guideline must be met, or the specific guidelines for actors. Please note that I'm giving you ample opportunities to click the links and familiarize yourself with these principles, so that future articles you create will have a better chance of survival. If you continue to create problematic articles without regard for notability, it is almost certain to be perceived as disruptive. Good luck, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yamini Malhotra

I have deleted Yamini Malhotra because a deletion discussion (which you did not bother to participate in) already occurred at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamini Malhotra. Consensus felt that deleting the article was appropriate. You need to very quickly read and understand our WP:NOTABILITY guidelines, because the next time you disruptively create an article about someone for whom you fail to establish notability, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Notability is generally established when there is significant coverage from established reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This means in-depth articles written about a person, not passing mentions and photo galleries. "Reliable sources" means mainstream publications with established reputations for fact-checking and a clear editorial policy. This excludes blogs, wikis, etc. Interviews do not count toward establishing notability. You have been given ample opportunity to read these pages, as they are linked numerous times in my last comment to you. Note also that Wikipedia does not tolerate promotion, so if that's what you are here to achieve, you should find somewhere else to do it. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siddharth Slathia

A tag has been placed on Siddharth Slathia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The king of the sun (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gurjar Aandolan

The article Gurjar Aandolan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. All but one of the references are either dead links or pages not mentioning Gurjar Aandolan, and the other one does not indicate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Conflict of interest

Hello, Shamimanm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. The king of the sun (talk) 15:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Siddharth Slathia. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Diff: [4] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gurjar Aandolan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gurjar Aandolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurjar Aandolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The king of the sun (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ek Prayas

Hello Shamimanm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ek Prayas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ek Prayas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambedkar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ek Prayas. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Diff: [5] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gulista Aalija

I have deleted the article Gulista Aalija because you did not adequately establish the subject's notability either per our general notability guideline or per the specific criteria at WP:NACTOR. Just because someone exists doesn't mean they deserve an article at Wikipedia--they have to be notable, and your responsibility as an editor is to be sure your properly establish the subject's notability per Wikipedia standards. I believe that you likely have a conflict of interest with the subjects you have created articles on. If so, you are strongly discouraged from editing these articles or creating new articles about people that you might have a close connection to. I get the sense that you are using Wikipedia as an advertising platform, which you are not allowed to do. Please stop. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've recreated the problem article but haven't properly established the subject's notability. I'll give you 48 hours to do so before it is deleted again. I'm getting the sense that you're only here for promotional purposes, so I'd advise you to start discussing your edits here rather than silently resubmitting them. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gulista Aalija

A tag has been placed on Gulista Aalija requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gulista Aalija for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulista Aalija is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulista Aalija until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Gulista Aalija, you may be blocked from editing. for (;;) (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ek Prayas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ek Prayas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ek Prayas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shamim Azad (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamim Azad (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamim Azad (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 17:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shamimanm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel Sorry for my mistake. I did not know about wikipedia's terms and conditions. But now I have learnt from mistakes, And i will Contribute Wikipedia with its terms and conditions. Forgive me for my mistakes and plzz unblock me...Thank You

Decline reason:

You were caught multiple times violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE and knew perfectly well what you were doing. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request, because this didn't come remotely close. Yamla (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Sadh Orhan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sadh Orhan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadh Orhan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krishna Kumar Srivastava

The article Krishna Kumar Srivastava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gurchet Chitarkar

The article Gurchet Chitarkar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]