User talk:Shailendra4797
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Shailendra4797, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Edutions Learning, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Edutions Learning
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Edutions Learning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
[edit]
Hello, Shailendra4797, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Edutions (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello Shailendra4797. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Edutions Learning, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shailendra4797. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shailendra4797|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Likely WP:SOCK of User talk:Edutions. – Athaenara ✉ 05:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion Issue
[edit]Actually in this article I have provide only company information there is nothing any words that advertise company product or service, I didn't explain company services and I also didn't explain company exact location. 2409:4063:430F:5F9F:C878:A6FF:FE6E:20ED (talk) 07:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Assuming that you are the user Shailendra4797 but not logged into your account, allow me to explain a few things.
- A company isn't entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. A company must meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable company to be considered worthy of inclusion. For this to happen, it must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the company.
- We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself. Using Wikipedia to publicize your company's existence is promotion, whether or not you believe it to be. Even if your company were notable enough for inclusion, articles are typically written by editors that have no personal, political or financial interest in the subject.
- If you are affiliated with the company, then it is a conflict of interest for you to write about it. If your position with the company is a paid position, then it is mandatory that you disclose this information per Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure policy.
- Using multiple accounts to promote the same topic repeatedly is considered sockpuppetry. Instead of trying to evade the block on your original account, you should have instead requested an unblock from the original account with a proposed new name, and listed other topic areas you intend to edit that are unrelated to your company.
- However, if you have no interest in contributing to Wikipedia other than to write about your company, then you should instead seek out an alternative outlet where this type of writing is allowed. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.