User talk:Shadowblade

Mark Greer

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Greer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mark Greer. spryde | talk 20:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, do you have any secondary sources that cover the notability of Mark? Just because one page in WP refers to a person does not automatically convey notability to that person. I have looked around and cannot seem to find anything regarding him in a reliable secondary source. spryde | talk 20:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might be able to. Personally, if I knew I was going to be able to find sources, I would create a subpage of my userspace, create the article there and when it is ready, copy the final version to mainspace. This ensures that nobody (like me :) ) comes along and tags it for deletion. See User:Sp/William Martin Aiken as an example of an article I developed in userspace that I eventually moved to mainspace. spryde | talk 21:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can request deletion of the article yourself by putting {{db-author}} at the top of the page. spryde | talk 21:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CIPFG

According to Wikipedia it's better to expand an article then to delete it. Please let me know what is the problem with CIPFG from your point of view. When does something meet the WP:N from your point of view? --HappyInGeneral (talk) 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags.

Just so you know, {{nn-warn-reason}} with a reason of "Bio" is unlikely to be helpful to a new user. Is there a script you are using to tag articles for deletion and place these notices? —Random832 18:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, templates are fine - but {{db-bio-notice}} is a better one to use in this situation (and, similarly, {{db-bio}} is shorter to type than {{db-reason}} on the article itself) - just a friendly suggestion —Random832 18:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Varg Veum

I've placed a hangon tag here. Bearian (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions

I noticed you tagged the article Glued money for speedy deletion as "non-encyclopedic". However, this is not one of the reasons for which articles may be speedily deleted. Please review Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and use only the reasons listed there. For articles that don't meet these criteria, you can use the proposed deletion and articles for deletion discussion processes. Cheers! --Ginkgo100^talk 05:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Infrastructure/Geophysical Division

You tagged this for {{db-repost}}, but I can't seem to find the AfD under which it was deleted; indeed, nothing in project space links to the article, such that it doesn't seem even to have been part of a group AfD non-traditionally captioned. Was the article differently titled when previously deleted? Thanks in advance for your help, and apologies for (what is very likely) my imbecility. Joe 05:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antony and Cleopatra

I am working on this new article of a recently released book. There are several links to this page already. Please refrain from adding the speedy delete template. Thanks. JPotter 00:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sidney Dillon speedy declined

Hi, Shadow. The creator added assertions of significance after you tagged it. Dloh cierekim 23:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome

Hello, Shadowblade! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dloh cierekim 23:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion

Hi. You just tagged Anti-alienism under patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is more like pages that contain "skvgjndfbvndlfkndfkbjndfk" and similar things. I did delete the page under no context, so no harm done. Have a nice day, and thank you for new page patrolling! *Cremepuff 222* 23:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I like your username. 'Shadowblade' sounds cool. :-p -- Menti fisto 23:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]