Jump to content

User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archives/2015/May

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your question at DRN

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal article is what you're looking for, I think. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Much appreciateed, thanks. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
‎

Trivia

Regarding this edit and its editsummary, in which you claimed to have removed "trivia". Since there is such a thing a removing trivia from an article, but what you removed was actually a gallery, please be so kind to provide accurate editsummaries and say that you removed a picture gallery. To provide your fellow editors with accurate information. Thank you. Debresser (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Executions during the Irish Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Fisher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Need to create a article on Gurdip Sing Anand

Hello

Yesterday My article Gurdip Sing Anand was deleted by reviewer ..I need to recreate again so can I use the previous one or need to create new because I m trying to new one but it direct me to contact administrator who is deleted the article

Please let me know in fast reply

Mayur Phatak System Admin Universal business School — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubskjt (talk • contribs) 15:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Ubskjt, what is your connection to the character Gurdip Sing Anand ? Cheers! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Gurdip Sing Anand is our Business School ( Universal business School) founder

Please see WP:COI then Cheers!

What I do exactly ?? Please let me know so it easy for me to create article on our sir Shri Gurdip Sing Anand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubskjt (talk • contribs) 15:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Is he discussed in local or national newspapers, magazines, websites etc? Who deleted the page? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

no ...I received alert that speed deletion so i contact to reviewer that I am working with universal business school and need to create a article on our sir shri gurdip sing anand but with in 24 hours he delete the article Artivle delete by lakun.patra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubskjt (talk • contribs) 15:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

I remember. It was deleted because it was COPYRIGHT material which is ILLEGAL. Do you know what that means? This is the information, including the website you stole from: 21:59, 25 March 2015 Materialscientist (talk | contribs) deleted page Gurdip Singh Anand (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.universalbusinessschool.com/our-founders.php)

Ubskjt sir this is our college website and we place a info about our founder Mr. Gurdip Sing Anand Please let me know is that possible to create new one with new text material or possible to old one ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubskjt (talk • contribs) 15:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

See WP:BETTER: That will tell you what to do. Bye! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vijay (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page And. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Serial Number 54129/Archives/2015. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Deb (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Richard III...

Fortuna, can you take it easy with the reverts on Richard III? I know you're responding on the talk page, but regardless of whether you've the strongest argument, you're over the 3RR mark now. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

No, I'm reverting vandalism (repeated insertion of unsourced material), but thanks for the advice all the same. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
No, you're being a bit of a dog in a manger. Deb (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Well, personal attacks are nothing more than a language issue are they...
What has happened to your SOH? Deb (talk) 12:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Well, it kept getting me into trouble didn't it Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Just try to recognise that not everyone understands the subtleties of your argument. I feel you should apologise (to Isananni, not to me) for mocking her, but I don't suppose I can convince you to act like a man (or woman). I sound like your mother now. Deb (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Deb, on a serious note- when did I mock her? I mean, I called her out on an editing issue, but I said it wasn't personal. Or do you mean the religion thing? AND (edit) she insulted me loadsa times.Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC):That's why YOU do not get paid for this kind of things Isananni (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Well, I've got plenty more good lines about religion. All from WP:RS too. Cáisc shona duit ! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

NOW you see - Isananni does not fully understand this comment: "Okay, okay, sorry! ...Frankie Boyle gets paid for that kind of thing". She has taken it as another insult when in fact you meant it as an apology for being offensive. You should both stay away from one another's talk pages unless you are prepared to give and take. Deb (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes that is a shame. I did make a suggestion earlier regarding us both. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
An honest apology would have stopped at "sorry" with no need of your intervention for being uttered Deb, and you know it as well as I do Isananni (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes; I'm still waiting for one. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

One of you - I don't care which - should take the decision not to have the last word. Deb (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

What's his name

Is that you? "an ordinary person who came from a small town, humble family". Seriously, though, it's obviously a misplaced user page and I'd have just moved it. Deb (talk) 17:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Negative, me. I've got more sense of humour than that. Can you still see it? I think the 'Cool Fact About...' section needs to be added immediately to MOS ...the possibility are endless. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I can see it, but I'm not telling you any more. You should have taken notes while you had the chance. Deb (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Richard III of England. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Useful template, thank you. AND I am not attacking anyone, I am fully entitled to remind all editors and admins of the full policy regarding supposed overlinks (which are not even my edits, like in most cases) and pursue consensus in changes to any article by bringing the discussion to the article talk page where it belongs. I will now leave your talk page, keep off mine Isananni (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

It was re: cretinous remarks about 'apprentice editors.' Would you like to discuss it at Wp:ANI? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Apprentice editor is your title on the badge you display on your page, I took it you were proud of it, I don't have one. You can address me as "inexperienced newcomer" in exchange if that suits you, it's the plain truth, even though that does not allow you to name my comments "childish accusations", let alone the rest which I am too tired to copy and paste again. But I did call you "haughty" in a summary of an edit once you deleted a couple of paragraphs as "trivia" (that were then reinstated in the Depictions in culture article) when I did not fully understand how changes could be discussed on the article talk page, for which I apologise. Isananni (talk) 17:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edward IV of England

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edward IV of England you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 12:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edward IV of England

The article Edward IV of England you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Edward IV of England for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Fallacy of composition

Why did you do that? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

About Page Arain

Why you removed my changes. Please read my message and reply. (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I did not. User:Charlesdrakew, on the other hand, did- an edit to which he beat me by about thirty seconds. You inserted unsourced, subjective material which smacked of your own opinions. I would imagine that any reinsertion of the material again, such as it is, would result in a similarly swift response... and perhaps a more sever one. Ciao. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

UAA Submission Clarification

Hello, Can you please clarify why Pulled u policc (talk · contribs · blocks · count · rollback · admin · logs) is a username violation? Your explanation on UAA was not sufficient. Nakon 03:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your edit at User talk:Kuru

Please do not remove content from other editors' talk page as you did here. It could be viewed as vandalism. Liz Read! Talk! 09:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Ah! I edited an old version of the page of course. As is pretty blinding obvious now. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 09:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Corporate Election Services

Please stay off

Stay away from my talk page. Thank you!

Cavalierman (talk) 18:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

No. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

  • Hi, I notice that you deliberately involved to disruptive edits that I edited. You violated the MOS, and policies and guidelines and added the poor writing standard with referring the good faith and NPOV and this. Alexf reverted back to my version. It is not the way to edit the articles. Please do not try if you have any bunch of editors; who may encourage your edits as legitimate, and I am going to block if I revert you. I ask you for the interest of the project, follow the policies and please correct the editing behaviour and do not ignore that the Wikipedia is not a battleground that you are trying to create. I look forward the neutral editors and administrators to maintain the rules to give the advice to stop such disruptive edits. Justice007 (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Prod

I remind you that according to WP:Deletion policy once aProd is removed, no one may add it back. The only course is Afd. (The exception is a BLP Prod, which can be removed only if an adequate reference for verification is added) DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are referring to. Please learn to provide links. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Louis Talpe

You deleted the external links and re-added a notice after I added references as external links. Please stop edit-warring with me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous032 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Replied on yours. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 22:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I did not vandalize at all. You were the one who deleted the external references. Do you even know what constitues vandalism? It seems like what you're engaged in is an edit war, not actual vandalism. Please desist from edit-warring / immature behavior.

Anonymous032 (talk) 04:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ralph de Greystoke, 5th Baron Greystoke
added links pointing to Protector and Richard, Duke of York
John de Greystoke, 4th Baron Greystoke
added a link pointing to Scots
List of Father Ted characters
added a link pointing to Schoolgirls

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Learn to check your links when creating them. The last link you posted on my page did not exist. Also, I did assume good faith, however your edit history gives me credible reason to believe otherwise. Anonymous032 (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

You suggested that I engaged in "vandalism" which is a personal attack. You also suggested that I engaged in a personal attack with you, when I did not, which itself constitutes a personal attack. Please see personal attacks. Please desist from further personal attacks. Your behavior towards me suggests a pattern of hostility and may be considered disruptive editing. You have already posted on my talk page numerous times and suggested the page I created for deletion several times. You have not sufficiently given an adequate explanation for why the page should be deleted. You have suggested that I was a "vandal." You've been edit-warring with me in the last few days. This suggests hostile behavior.

You need to read WP:NPA, WP:EW and WP:VAN before you go throwing the policies around. Just saying something does not make it so. I.e., it may not "be considered disruptive editing," except in your mind. You were already warned about adding spam links. That and the generally tabloid nature of the sources do not constitute another policy you should read- WP:RS. Now leave this TP alone, I thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

I didn't vandalize anything. I'm aware of those pages. Please stop personally attacking me. Anonymous032 (talk) 16:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

(uninvolved editor) May I suggest one of you brings this up to WP:AN/I to get opinions from uninvolved editors? You're making things unnecessarily heated and it's turning into a WP:BATTLEGROUND. Amaury (talk) 16:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

The article's deletion is being discussed per process, which seems to have been taken personally by another editor. Thanks for input though Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

The Angel Heart Barnstar

The Angel Heart Barnstar The Angel Heart Barnstar
Thanks for your observation on User talk:SimonTrew.  — ₳aron 18:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

You cheered me up

With the sillies on my talk page, you did. You cheered me up. Thank you. Si Trew (talk) 20:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Apprentice

I think you earned your badge. I have been editing here since 2009 I think, but I just gnome around at WP:RFD and WP:PNT and stuff, I rarely add new pages but translate and stuff like that. Keep going, don't let anyone put you off. It is a pleasure to know you. At WP:RFD, my usual hangout, there are a wide range of people, I don't want to name names, you will see them, one from Canada, one from the Philippines, me an Englishman living in Hungary, I don't think we have any from the US though, we have from various part of the UK. We're a bit short on people from the US to bung in. But never let anyone tell you you can't edit here. This is Wikipedia, the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. So Be bold and just do it. People like me, gnomes like me, will tidy up if you get it wrong, but to my mind it is all about making it better. WP:NOTPERFECT, but better. Si Trew (talk) 20:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

@SimonTrew:Err ta. I'm from Leyton though. Ellopták az útlevelem! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:34, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Jo reggelt kivanok! (Why do I need to take my passport, by the way? ). I know it well, I used to be part of a computer club called London Atari Computer Enthusiasts (LACE) keeping alive the Atari 8-bit, and the leader was from Leytonstone (not quite Leyton, I realise that), and my mum was born in the Sally Army hospital in Hackney, not a million miles away. Probably becoming quite gentrified now, I imagine. Leyton High Street is a right mess though. I once drove through Waltham Forest in a Volkswagen Beetle with no brakes, well I drove back from my university in Manchester, but motorway was easy you never touch your brakes on a motorway if you drive well, but then the chap wanted dropping off in Leyton and had to get all the way through that lot to do so. That was fun with all the sleeping policemen. Only took me two minutes to fix the brake line, too. Si Trew (talk) 06:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

My talk

Well, if they let you out, I hope they put you back again: you're too scary for public view more than once every five years, perhaps Barnum and Bailey would be interested :)

But seriously, thank you for bunging in at WP:RFD, I for one appreciate it. Although we have a set of regulars who do the gnomework, for someone to come in and immediately start contributing, is very special. We're not that scary (I an a teddy bear in real life) and it is a backwater that is somewhat neglected as it is not very glamorous, it's not like WP:DYK where you get on the main page or owt, so it tends to be just a band of regulars churning through it. How User:Tavix finds them, I don't know, cos I just find them on my general ce'ing and so on, but he pulls habits out of rats all the time. Anyway, most people seem quite intelligent there and we discuss things vigorously but politely, and it's quite a wide spread geographically, although I wish we had someone from the US (we have a Canuck, User:Ivanvector). So please, bung in and you are more than welcome to, don't let anyone — not even me — put you off. Si Trew (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

fine rolls

If you removedt he copyvio, why did you want the rest deleted? DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

There was, in unfortunate fact, nothing salvageable from it, which I only realized having already removed what I had. The whole thing was lifted from that site. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Tagging

Advice for you: create articles in your userspace first before transposing them. That way you avoid wasting editors' time. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

And, cretin, don't go around calling people morons. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

One for the teahouse?

Hello,

I noticed you have removed the fatalities from the Birmingham pub bombings, with the loose justification it is not a memorial (which on the surface I agree with. There are a few things that lead me to disagree with this justification. Firstly, the talk page not only refers to discussions from eight years ago when the article was much less densely populated as to being worthy of inclusion, but also had/has users disagreeing with the label as a memorial. There are other articles (2014 Isla Vista killings, Bloody Sunday (1972)) etc. which list fatalities of notable events. It seems bizarre some articles note fatalities and when some do not. Much more to the point, however, is the fact that WP:NOTMEMORIAL has nothing to do with victim lists, but, rather, it is to stop people starting pages about specific non-notable people as a memorial to them. I shall therefore reinstate the victim list, hoping this does not start an edit war.

I think that, seeing as you almost certainly will disagree with me as to what would classify as a memorial and what not, that we should submit this to the Teahouse Questions page? I'll place the list back on there, then submit this to the teahouse, and if consensus on the teahouse page is to remove it, I'll abide by it. Best regards and let's remain civil.--Kieronoldham (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Not the teahouse, no. An WP:RFC is in order. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
AfC if you like, but the consensus position has for many years been that these in-article lists are acceptable. If you want that changed, you;d have to make the case for it. DGG ( talk ) 17:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
No- I do not. The consensus is as stands. Also this is not the place for discussing the matter. I'm not sure whether the Teahouse is the forum for deciding consensus; but it's certainly not here, and certainly not by you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I agree that this is not the place to discuss this matter however consensus can change and that is a fundamental pillar of Wikipedia. You couldn't even call the talk page discussion on that article a consensus anyways, it comes across as more of a gang-up and bully session, which does not equate to consensus. Mabuska (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

John Conyers (disambiguation)

Where there is a primary topic, the standard format for a dab page is as it was before you changed it - I've reverted. See WP:MOSDAB. Thanks. PamD 16:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

And that two-bob politician is a primary topic? What an interesting world we live in. PS- this suggests otherwise. You see Watson, but you do not observe. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:02, Monday, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Wot a load of old cobblers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Arbcom

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 11:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns arbitration case request declined

The Incivility, AN/I non-resolution, irony AfD concerns arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to, has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 02:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Sunil Shetty

Hi, can you explain why the editing with adequate references were reverted? worked/working on this page for hours. this really hurts. The details are not good faith, but added references.Rajeshbieee (talk) 19:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for watching my talk page. I have had a surgical procedure and have been offline for a few days. I just returned to editing but had not yet removed my offline message. I have done that now. The editor who left the message had written a very poor entry with spelling and grammatical mistakes. I reverted it through Huggle but probably should have left an explanation because Huggle's templates do not cover the situation very well. I used editing tests as the reason. I did wonder whether something that poorly written was meant to be nonconstructive, which would make editing tests appropriate for a first warning. It was not a good addition, regardless of where it was placed in the article. Donner60 (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Trout at ANI

Like IBall, who had the integrity to admit he'd overstepped in criticizing my actions, I suggest you do your due diligence, and read the discussion on the CSI: Cyber talk page before criticizing me for something that doesn't actually apply, then revert your addition. You can't discuss in the middle of a mud-slinging match, which was when I stepped away. Prior to that, I was actively in the discussion. It's easy to point the finger, and harder to admit you might have leapt to a conclusion baselessly. --Drmargi (talk) 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Nonsense. It had already been addressed and dealt with by others. Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 22:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

You reverted the Sherlock logo to the title card which has changed between series and so is less informative and should be removed. So I have to ask why you say improving the page with a standard logo is vandalism? --Warner REBORN (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

You've been reverted three times over it now. Go to Talk if you have issues over it. Ciao. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Editing war

you better giving warning to user:Mattythewhite--lauyulam 13:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauyulam (talk • contribs)

No; but I will report you for harassing him. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

hahaha joking--lauyulam 14:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

you are harassing me--lauyulam 14:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauyulam (talk • contribs)

These are Catalan name instead of Spainish name

you are making a big big mistake--lauyulam 14:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauyulam (talk • contribs)

Unfortunate as that may be, it is still better than edit warring, for which there is no excuse. You should be discussing it. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Serial_Number_54129/Archives/2015/May&oldid=1140073874"