User talk:Sergiodlarosa

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Sergiodlarosa: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! --Margareta 19:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Rewilding Institute on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 18:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Rewilding, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Margareta 21:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rewilding. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Margareta 16:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Please stop. The photographs are enormous, and they make the page impossible to load or read. JasonGodesky 20:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rewilding, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Margareta 19:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are destroying every article you edit, please stop! / Mats Halldin (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Casting herb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Casting herb.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Sergiodlarosa "Casting herb.jpg" This work was created entirely by Sergio De la Rosa and I offer it so that it is shown in texts of rewilding * in the wikipedia web page. Sergiodlarosa

Confirm image source

You have uploaded a great number of images who all appear to come from the book Rewilding North America. I hope you understand you don't hold the copyright to these images by just adding your name to them. Can you please confirm again you are the author of the following images? / Mats Halldin (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sergiodlarosa 23:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC) All and each one of the previous works (images.jpg), were created entirely by Sergio De la Rosa and I (the author) offer it so that it is shown in texts of rewilding * or bears * in the wikipedia web page.[reply]
Thanks
Sculptor and Illustrator Sergio De la Rosa
Sergiodlarosa 23:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muchos gracias Sergio,

Hablo uno o dos palabras de español pero no puedo escribar mucho. These images are discussed on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 July 12#Image:Ososspecies.jpg, so please answer there instead. Please also note my advice to read Traducción no oficial de la Licencia de documentación libre de GNU to make sure you understand what it means to release your images on Wikipedia.

Gracias

/ Mats Halldin (talk) 23:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. The subject of copyrights to me becomes somewhat confused at the time of cataloguing it in some of the terms. I only chose of the list the one that seemed to me the best option. I believe that the barrier of the language also has much to do. I understand that it is better than the image does not have text (please point me if I am mistaken). I believe that I do not have much problem with that. I have not shown in any book or magazines my illustrations, and I dont work for any Institution but the wild life is my passion and the Rewilding North America is project is very interesting and hopeful in my opinion. Soon I shipment other images for diferent texts and the update of which already you can see. thank you for its "signallings". I hope that the following images also are interesting for you and useful in Wikipedia.

Thanks

Sergiodlarosa 18:54, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio – I am still not clear how you have produced these images, such as Image:Sergiodelarosa.jpg. You say they are entirely your own work, but they appear to be montages of many different images. Did you create each of these other images as well, or did you only create the montage? If you did not create the images used, where did they come from? Richard New Forest (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard; did you discussed before remove it? of course, them are montages of many different images. they are photographies that "I shoot" in the zoological ones from zacango, chapultepec, africam safari, reinoanimal and bioparque estrella in México. Apparently if somebody strives to offer a good quality work is better not to try show it in wikipedia. sorry the spelling :User:Sergiodlarosa|Sergiodlarosa]]

I am a sculptor, always I sign my works, already I cleared my name of the images. what more I must to grant? :User:Sergiodlarosa|Sergiodlarosa]]

I did not delete the image, I only removed the image from an article, for which it was inappropriate. Discuss there please.

The images in your montage are not all photographs – so where did the others come from? If they are all photos, please can I come with you on your next trip to see imperial mammoths and giant sloths...? Richard New Forest (talk) 10:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete? who talked about delete? For megatherium, doedicurus and phorusrhacus I marked its origin above of the animal. all the other prehistoric ones I created them in photoshop from my photographies.the barrier of the language is a problem. excuses me if my english language is read crude or very incomplete, is not my intention. :User:Sergiodlarosa|Sergiodlarosa]]

Why do you think that it is inappropiate?

If you made those images they are excellent – well done. Don't worry about your English – you're not doing too badly, better than me in any other language.

Discuss the image and list on Talk:Pleistocene rewilding. Richard New Forest (talk) 20:59, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens

Hola Sergio, sus imagens fueron quitado porque no estaban en ningun pagina, no por ninguna problema de copyright. Vea la nota aqui[1]. El dice que usted puede poner los imagenes de nuevo, pero necesitan estar en una pagina. Penso que usted tiene un pocito de confusion sobre como poner los imagenes en una manera de no romper los paginas. Talvez le ayudara si usted lea los instrucciones, vea los otros imagenes y como estan ponido en las paginas, y tal vez practicar en el Sandbox. Buena suerte y gracias por compartir sus artes.--Margareta 23:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio, is there anyway you could get into contact with me via email? - I have some extremely similar photoshop projects that I have been working on about Pleistocene North America, and I'm wondering if we could discuss some things related to the subject, email is Dantheman9758@yahoo.com... sorry if i'm breaking wikipedia rules contacting u this way but i can't seem to figure out how wikipedia works (so if this msg gets deleted its fine with me)... but please try to contact me I've got some pretty interesting things you might want to look at, if u need an example, look at the Arctodus simus page and you will see one of my photoshop renderings of an arctodus —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantheman9758 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canines

Hi Sergiodlarosa, I love your images. I just need you to me a favor. Make a portrait of all the canid (or canine species) like you did with the cats and bears.--4444hhhh (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an e-mail account. Ask another user though.--4444hhhh (talk) 20:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Image:Aleutians.jpg. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ←Gee♥Alice 04:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bear. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 04:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pleistocene Rewilding has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — Insanity Incarnat e 19:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bear do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Tombstone (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==Speedy deletion of Image:Bearspecies.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Bearspecies.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is an unused image that the uploader has placed restrictions on. (do no drastically alter the picture in any way)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Bearspecies.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sergiodelarosa.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sergiodelarosa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:SEADEVILCRUISE6.15.05JCUV411.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SEADEVILCRUISE6.15.05JCUV411.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bility (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Felidae.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Felidae.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Quibik (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aleutiansleo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aleutiansleo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Wild new america.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wild new america.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Wild old america.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wild old america.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Rewilding vision.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Rewilding vision.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:How I can change the tiger position.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:How I can change the tiger position.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rewilding place.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rewilding place.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Castingcarniv.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Castingcarniv.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Castingherb.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Castingherb.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Leocoylob.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Leocoylob.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Winter2two.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Winter2two.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Touraleut.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Touraleut.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Great plain.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Great plain.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:PARQUE PLEISTOCENO.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:PARQUE PLEISTOCENO.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Pleistorewilding .jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Pleistorewilding .jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Pleistoceno mexico.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Pleistoceno mexico.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lack ssomething.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lack ssomething.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Then rrewilding.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Then rrewilding.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:How I can change the tiger position.jpg

The file File:How I can change the tiger position.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, watermarked (see left side of image), also unclear if this is entirely the uploader's own work or if it is a derivative work

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Lack ssomething.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]