User talk:Sempta

Welcome!

Hello, Sempta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Antiochian Syriac Christianity"

Sempta, can I ask what source you have for the abovenamed term? Whilst I can understand your confusion in that there are Antiochian Greek Christians; that term only exists to differentiate them from other Greek Christians, e.g. Egyptian or otherwise, whereas there is only kind of Syriac Christianity as it all descends from the Church of Antioch. The term and category you have created is simply named Syriac Christianity in academia, hence why I reverted your edits and redirected the category to Syriac Christianity. Mugsalot (talk) 18:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand which is the confusion you talk about above in the first line. The claim that "there is only kind of Syriac Christianity as it all descends from the Church of Antioch" is false. The Church of the East, for example, is of Syriac tradition and its origins and development have nothing to do with Antioch. The same can be applied to the multiple Syriac Mesopotamian churches, or even to the Persian Church and all the East Syriac tradition. There is a serious deficit in Western academia when treating this issues and there is also no enough written on this matter. It is derogatory, naive and totally avoidable to transfer such vices here. Antiochian Christians have evolved in different groups (mainly self-labelled Syriac and Greek ones) and it is sophist to reason a term is false because Western academia has not get it yet in a certain proportion. --Sempta (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sempta, in other words, you have no source that supports the term you have added. It is simple. The term "Antiochian Syriac Christianity" does not exist in English-language sources as far as you or I can prove and that is the single most important criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. Therefore, if it does not exist in academia, then it has no place on Wikipedia. Mugsalot (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go to page 3 and read the paragraph that starts with The term "Syriac"... here: ANTIOCH AND SYRIAC CHRISTIANITY - A CHALCEDONIAN PERSPECTIVE ON A SPIRITUAL HERITAGE.--Sempta (talk) 19:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sempta, that source does not use the term "Antiochian Syriac Christians" or "Antiochian Syriac Christianity". There is no point in making an argument that the term should exist or not, it simply does not currently exist. Mugsalot (talk) 20:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you didn't get the point of that particular paragraph nor its direct implications, among them the usage of this term. Antiochian tradition isn't a patrimony exclusive of the Rums. Being a literalist doesn't make much sense, if I may say. --Sempta (talk) 20:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. You don't understand that if something is not supported by sources, and you have provided none that outright use the term you have invented, then it does not belong on Wikipedia as it simply does not exist in academia. Mugsalot (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French anti-Zionists

A tag has been placed on Category:French anti-Zionists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]