User talk:SeluxRedaktion

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, SeluxRedaktion, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SeluxRedaktion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

we are representing the official editorial office of the company. We are now working on all sources and references to publish really authentic staff.

Decline reason:

That's inappropriate. See WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:COI. Note, though, that the only reason for this block is your inappropriate username. Please pick a new username. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC) SeluxRedaktion (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC) If I would chance the name to SLXwriter would it help?[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SeluxRedaktion (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SLXwriter is obviously still intended to represent your company; try again. Just Chilling (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok to use a kind of metaphorical name like "Lichtgestalten"? SeluxRedaktion

'Lichtgestalten' 'Light design' is also promotional. If you want a metaphor 'Lichtschwert' is available! Just Chilling (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Selux

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Selux, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 13:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion has been declined. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Selux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok to use German sources for English wiki page? there are a lot of German references. SeluxRedaktion

! Please don't delete anything until tomorrow evening, since we have to leave for now and will continue to work on it tomorrow. We will read all the guidelines in even more depth and will work on detailed sources. Thanks! SeluxRedaktion 13:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a week-long discussion, so nothing is going to happen immediately. Don't panic! On the other hand, the longer you leave it before improving the article, the more Delete !votes will likely have been cast.
"we" - part of the problem with the username, besides representing the company, is that it seems to be a shared account. Using names which indicate the company or its business, or which suggest shared use, or use of "we" will only cause you more problems.
German sources are OK - not brilliant - but definitely OK.

Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More

I've speedy deleted this obvious company spam, unsourced, but looks like a copyright violation. You have a conflict of interest when editing this article, and you must declare it whatever user name you use. Since you work directly or indirectly for the company, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SeluxRedaktion or any replacement. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SeluxRedaktion|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please provide the required disclosure. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SeluxRedaktion/sandbox/Selux

A tag has been placed on User:SeluxRedaktion/sandbox/Selux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 1989 12:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]