User talk:SelenaG10
March 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Cornerstonepicker. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Revival (Selena Gomez album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Revival (Selena Gomez album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. livelikemusic talk! 15:22, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 21:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit]Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to It Ain't Me. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not add new Billboard peaks at this time without providing an additional source. Ss112 19:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Spanish charts
[edit]promusicae.es may be preferred, but there is currently nothing wrong with using spanishcharts.com as a source on Wikipedia. If you have a legitimate issue with its usage, you should take it up at either the Music WikiProject (perhaps WP:SONG) or Template talk:Single chart, as it is an encoded single chart entry. It isn't actually necessary to go onto single articles and change one's use to the other. Ss112 15:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Your username
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope that I don't seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. In brief:
There are four kinds of usernames that are specifically disallowed:
- Misleading usernames imply relevant, misleading things about the contributor. Misleading names include those that imply you are in a position of authority over Wikipedia, or those that impersonate other people.
- Promotional usernames are used to promote a group, company, product or website on Wikipedia.
- Offensive usernames are those that offend other contributors, making harmonious editing difficult or impossible.
- Disruptive usernames include outright trolling or personal attacks, or otherwise show a clear intent to disrupt Wikipedia.
I think your username may be a problem under one or more of these headings (you can find more details at Wikipedia:Username policy), and this needs to be addressed.
There are several options available to you:
- We can talk about this, here - if you're not sure how or why your username might not meet policy, disagree that there's a problem, or are not sure what alternative to use.
- You can abandon the contributions made under this name and immediately create a new account that meets our username policy. Happy editing!
- Or, if you want to keep your contributions history under a new name, visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the instructions there.
Just so you know, if we can't resolve this on our own, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process. Thanks. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SelenaG10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SelenaG10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]"Just as official"
[edit]In response to this, no, the Rolling Stone chart (and it's Rolling Stone singular, not "Rolling Stones"—that's the band) is not "just as official" as the Billboard Hot 100, a chart that has been around for over 50 years. Don't get what is a valid chart confused with what the official chart of the United States is. Make no mistake—the official chart of the US is still Billboard. Ss112 03:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)