User talk:Seithx

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Seithx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22184 was submitted on Jul 26, 2018 12:02:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:Potato are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Potato, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[User:FlightTime]@flightTime can you clarify since when does the wikipedia Talk page, does not have discussions on issues with the article it's being posted on??? I am now being disruptive for stating an article is wrong, or a different complete Tab? what is this, politically correct silencing?

What was exactly, can you point, my own personal and subjective feelings? I referred to the sources from the article itself in criticism.

"When you find a passage in an article that is biased, inaccurate, or unsourced the best practice is to improve it if you can rather than deleting salvageable text. For example, if an article appears biased, add balancing material or make the wording more neutral. Include citations for any material you add. If you do not know how to fix a problem, ask for help on the talk page." ????

April 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a matter of opinion to ask for a source for a sentence on Wikipedia? Now the talk page is not allowed? why some discussions are OK and some are not, by what distinction? But still, your response is unclear. I don't need the manual, the EXACT place to comment is on the talk page of the matter, what is the relevance of discussing Nuclear energy on the Style/Lead manual talk page? How is a comment relevant to the matter, being disruptive? Seithx (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't post on the talk page, you added your thoughts in the middle of the manual of style itself, responding to one of its paragraphs.

You're welcome to post to the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe are you talking about a different issue? I am referring to my comment on "Sustainable Energy" requesting citations, it seems related, however, I don't remember ever responding the Lead Section. Seithx (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was the edit, and it's all I'm talking about. It's been removed. Possibly you meant to put the comment on Talk:Sustainable energy instead, since it seems to be about that topic. --Lord Belbury (talk) 20:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]