User talk:Segagustin
|
July 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 27 Club, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
A lengthy welcome
[edit]Hi Segagustin. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.
If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Argentina´s 2023 Elections
[edit]Dear @Segagustin, I found it not relevant just to highlight the 3 most voted presidential nominees. I understand that it may be complicated to allocate 10 or even 8 nominees on the main page, however being only 5 nominees is OK to allocate all, besides, to be impartial, the order is organized in alphabetical order. I appreciate not modifying the actual page without a good argument. Kodosbs (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi.
- I think you're right on the changes, and although i wont delete Schiaretti and Bregman off the list, i would change the order based on the importance of each candidate Segagustin (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Segagustin , Wikipedia is a space based in neutrality. The most non biased way is in alphabetical order, so, when you mention importance becomes a biased. Please had a better argument to just move one nominee as first in the list. If not I will require a third view and a possible santions against your account. Kodosbs (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- It's not based on personal preference (just for give you an idea, Schiaretti is the candidade close to my political positions and he's going to receive 5% of the vote at best), it's based on the importance of each candidate. Let's take a look:
- Massa: the candidate of the ruling, Peronist/Kirchnerist goverment (Union for the Homeland).
- Bullrich: the candidate of the mainstream right (Together for Change).
- Milei: the right wing-far right outsider candidate who took everyone by surprise last August (Liberty Advances).
- Schiaretti: the Federal/Dissident Peronist candidate (We Do for Our Country, whose predecessor, Federal Consensus, received 6,1% of the vote in the 2019 presidential election, with Roberto Lavanga on the ticket).
- Bregman: the Trotskyst candidate (Worker's Left Front). By the way, there were more votes in blank in the primary elections (4.85%) than votes for her (1.87%) of her coalition as a whole (2.65%). Segagustin (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Segagustin , Wikipedia is a space based in neutrality. The most non biased way is in alphabetical order, so, when you mention importance becomes a biased. Please had a better argument to just move one nominee as first in the list. If not I will require a third view and a possible santions against your account. Kodosbs (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Argentine general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz Province. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2023 Argentine general election
[edit]
On 20 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Argentine general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
July 2024 revert
[edit]Sorry about my revert of your edit yesterday in the North Carolina election article. The news is changing faster than I can go through my watchlist. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 13:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Contentious topics alert for post 1992 American politics
[edit]Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Doug Weller talk 19:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Funnist image: I can see, but can you add words for the image to have more? I'm want to see!
[edit]Thanks for the image! I'm sure it didn't fit but I'll move it soon. But can you please add a summary to the article The finger? It would be benefit a lot. 2012An(4thwm1) (talk) 11:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)