User talk:Seegoon/Archive 2

deftones discog

I think that the inclusion of Teething on the Crow soundtrack was a more official release than the Like Linus demo. I'm not even sure that the two tracks are the same recording (I haven't listened to all of Like Linus). The other thing is that you could still go out and buy the Crow City of Angels of soundtrack and get that track, whereas you'd be hard-pressed to get a copy of Like Linus. - Phorque (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Isis logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Isis logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Peer review please?

Hey Seegoon! I've just posted the article I Don't Remember at WP:PR. Since you're interested in music, I was wondering if you'd be interested in giving the article a looking over... maybe you'll see something we've missed? That'd be awesome! Thanks! --rm 'w avu 08:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks mate - you rock! Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. It's excellent and very swift! --rm 'w avu 08:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks to you...

And your fantastic contributions and suggestions at Peer Review, we've nominated "I Don't Remember" as a Featured Article. Just a courtesy note. Thanks again for your great help given there! --rm 'w avu 13:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

S Club peer review

Hello there. I've noticed your name on the peer review volunteer list, and I was wondering if it were possible for you to check out the S Club article and leave any comments you think are necessary. It'd be great if you could. :) - ǀ Mikay ǀ 12:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Converge.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Converge.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Vädersolstavlan

Hello,
You are a volunteered copyeditor listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and I'd be glad if you could have a look at the article Vädersolstavlan I just nominated for peer reviewing. My shortcomings in English most likely makes copyediting both necessary and easy.
Thanks
/ Mats Halldin (talk) 05:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Heroes peer review

I noticed that your user name was on the Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers list. I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 05:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Odyssey Number Five

Just as a heads up, the article was using Aussie date formatting. [1]. I won't revert because you did good stuff too and I'm lazy, but yeah...anyways, thanks. *huggles* :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 09:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:These Arms are Snakes

Template:These Arms are Snakes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. mitrebox (talk) 06:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Shady Records peer review

Hey Seegoon! I noticed that you're a volunteer of reviews that's interested in music. I was hoping you'd be able to review the Shady Records article. I've put it up for WP:PR and, upon following the steps, have thought that you would be ideal for this. Would be cool and highly appreciated if you could review it! Peer review page is here. -- Harish - 16:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Firstly, thanks for the peer review - I look forward to get working on it. I didn't know if I should comment here as I wasn't sure if you'd be looking back at the peer review (considering you are a review volunteer), but I just wanted to explain the dates that you saw in the discography. I noticed you called the format weird, though you didn't specifically say it should be removed so I assumed it was up for debate. Basically, the table haas been designed in a sortable manner, but unfortunately the typical date format (i.e. 6 February 2008) doesn't allow for this. The reason it's set the way it is is so that it allows for a person who wants the sort the table by artist names or album names to be able to arrange it back to release date order. It's been mentioned in the talk page, and the current format was considered suitable by me, with no one else saying otherwise. Seeing as you're the reviewer, what would you suggest to be appropriate? -- Harish - 23:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Haha, I agree about the programming - review it! (if possible)... j/k. Thanks again. -- Harish - 19:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Deftones.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Deftones.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Cite templates

Just a note, since I've seen you mention this on two FAC reviews; cite templates are not a requirement of WP:WIAFA. Consistently formatted citations, by whatever method, is the requirement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Isis logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Isis logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Feeder Discography

Hi!, you just click on "Statistics", then "Certified Awards", and use the search engine from there :). It's all free, but most sections of the site are locked to subscribers.Marcus Bowen (talk) 14:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Peer review request for Jack Warner

I saw your name on the list of volunteers for peer reviews. I recently nominated the film biography Jack Warner. Any feedback would be much appreciated! Sincerely, -- twelsht (talk) 23:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Shades of the Swarm

Nah, I don't have it. I believe it's sold out already which happened really fast.

I do hear good things though.

User:The Metro (talk)

RATM Discography

Yes i was, but its not a music video, so it doesn't belong there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihsbislns (talk • contribs) 14:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review

I saw your name on the volunteer list for peer review so I decided to contact you. I recently made a peer review request for Aang and I would really appreciate if you left a couple of comments on the article. Thanks a lot! Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 20:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD

Congratulations on your recent successful WP:FL promotion. You may be interested in taking part in our experimental procedure for the selecting lists of the day and lists of the month at WP:LOTD.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Requesting peer review of Facebook

I noticed that you listed yourself as a volunteer for general copyediting for peer review. I am requesting a peer review from you for Wikipedia:Peer review/Facebook/archive2, if you have the time. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review idea

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 23:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on the beatings will continue until morale improves, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this barnstar. God job! --Sharkface217 19:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Enjoy. --Sharkface217 19:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Requesting peer review of PHP

I noticed that you listed yourself as a volunteer for general copyediting for peer review. I am requesting a peer review from you for Wikipedia:Peer review/PHP/archive2, if you have the time. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 21:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

CE request

Hi. Any chance you feel like being a picky bastard and copyediting Max Mosley? A FAC reviewer has requested that the article be copyedited, citing a tendency to overlong sentences as a problem. I've had a go myself, but it really needs a fresh pair of eyes. (Mosley himself is the son of the pre-WWII Fascist leader Oswald Mosley, a former barrister, racing driver, auto racing team owner and now the head of motorsport's world governing body, the FIA). Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

FAC nixed due partly to various copyedit concerns, but more to the recent 'Nazi sex orgy' allegations from the News of the World. Headline writer's dream, I should think. Anyway, it's probably not worth bothering now, since we're likely to see some instability for a while. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Maynard James Keenan Peer review

Just dropping a request, as I'm going for FA and I saw you listed on the volunteer list as doing music articles. Thanks for your consideration. Regards, Lara❤Love 05:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Aang

I saw your name on the PR volunteer list, so I decided to come to you. The Aang article was kept from FA status mainly for one reason: prose. I would really appreciate it if you could look over the article and provide some comments on the prose or maybe even copyedit it yourself. Thanks. — Parent5446 ^{(t n c e m l)} 21:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

27

the article's been up, 27 (band). if you can add anything please do, it's relatively spartan. thanks Naufana : talk 20:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Gilberto Gil

Could you possibly make some "exceptionally anal" comments for the Gilberto Gil peer review, as I think I may go for WP:FAC at some point soon? I was given a recommendation from Laser brain to get some other copy editing suggestions to polish the article off before I make the big push for FAC. Best, Kakofonous (talk) 19:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

PR Request

Hey, I found you on the volunteer list and was hoping you could pop on over to a little article I'm hoping to make into at least a GA. The article is Posting system (PR) and I'm hoping you can help with layout, organization and any other general grammar problems. Thanks! Torsodog (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Boat is now the Core Topics Collaboration

You showed support for Boat at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF. This article was selected as our collaboration. Hope you can help.

Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Copy-editing Request

Hi there. I am writing for your assistance for the article NeXT. It is currently up at FAC, and has done very well so far, but one reviewer has noted the article needs a copy-edit from an editor not already involved. I am the main contributor, and would love to see this finally become a featured article (it's failed three times already). A list of the main issues which need addressing can be found at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/NeXT. Please let me know if you can get around to copy-editing this within the week. Thanks! — Wackymacs (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyedit assistance?

Hello, I was wondering (since you listed yourself at WP:PRV) if you could provide some help copyediting Riven, which is currently at FAC. I've already asked another user, but I figure its good to get lots of fresh sets of eyes on the article :) If you can provide any help at all, that would be great. Thanks for reading this, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 19:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Deftones - Back to School EP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Deftones - Back to School EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyediting help?

It looks like you're another of those busy copyeditors. :-) I was wondering if you'd be willing to work on Steve Dahl, which I have at peer review currently? I'm planning on bringing it to FAC in the near future and could use someone particularly careful (or anal, as you note on your peer review copyediting volunteer listing.) Cheers! Nobody of Consequence (talk) 06:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Isis - In the Absence of Truth 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Isis - In the Absence of Truth 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Anal help needed

Hello! I'm seeking a volunteer willing to peer review the discography of Eminem. I've been extensively working on this article from a while to try to reach a "featured list" by following what the guidelines are and also by adding interesting "components" from other featured discographies. I saw you on the list of volunteers ("I can be exceptionally anal if need be.") and would really wish you could help, especially since you are also a member of the WP:WikiProject Discographies. Thanks no matter what. Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} 00:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I was a little taken aback by "Anal help needed". If it was intentional, bravo, if not - then you might want to watch for asking too many strangers for that specific variety of assistance. Um, discography, yeah, cool. I shall have a looksee tomorrow at some point! Seegoon (talk) 00:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Of course it was meant to only attract your attention. Thanks for your willingness to review the article. Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} 04:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I've given it a thorough perusal, and have to say that it looks great. A major issue, however, is the formatting of the references. They don't seem to consistently use {{cite web}}, or any templates whatsoever, and the buffs at WP:FLC will definitely pick you up on that. Content-wise, however, it seems very thorough. I might ask for an extra column in the Music videos section listing the relevant album, but beyond that, I think you're good to go. Great job! Seegoon (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I'll definitely work on the cite webs and add that extra column, which really shouldn't take that long. I also want to add a bunch of chart positions before I propose it. Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} 06:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

RATM discography is looking good.

Yo Seelong, all the issues you raised here seem to have been resolved; would you mind having a second look at the Rage Against the Machine discography to see how it compares against the FL criteria? Thanks, Skomorokh 15:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review#Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Austria)

Hi there,

I am asking for a big favours of yours. I nominated the article Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Austria) for featured list, but there were too many small grammar problems, so we decided to withdraw it, and do a peer review first. The list is complete and very well sourced. It also followed all he suggestions given in Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium) (recently promoted to featured list), so in general is in a very good shape. Only the description fields for the coins are in a need of a good copy/edit. Can you please help us to get this list promoted?

Many thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 06:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for massive favour on India Hose, a current FAC

Hello Seegoon, I was wondering if I could ask you for a massIve favour and help copyedit India House. This artilce is currently listed for FAC. A reviewer in the FAC mentioned quite strongly that the text is not upto the mark. I thought it would help a lot if somebody had a look and suggested any improvement, since it has already been copyedited once by another editor and once byself. Please understand that I am neither looking for your support in the FAC, nor am I asking you to comment on wether it deserves or not to be FA, since I realise this would be canvassing. Nontheless, any comments on improving the article would be extremely welcome. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 01:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

System of a Down discography cleanup

Hello, I was hoping you could help me clean up a few things on the System of a Down discography article to get it to featured article status. I'm not quite sure how to resolve these things, so I'm asking for help:

• The lead section. I'm clueless on how to make a perfect lead sections.
• The precise release dates for Sugar E.P. (by the way, should it be called Sugar E.P. or Sugar (EP)?) and Limited Edition Tour CD aren't known. Is this acceptable?
• There are four separate citations for SOAD's singles chartings on the Billboard Hot 100 chart. Are four citations okay?
• The citations for the music video directors for "Spiders" (Charlie Deaux), "Boom!" (Michael Moore) and "Hypnotize" (Shavo Odadjian) are missing. I can find links where it does say this here, here and here, but I have no idea if any of them are reliable or not (mvdbase.com even mentions a video for a song called "Sit Down", but I can't even find a song named "Sit Down" on any of the albums, so I don't think it's true).
• I can't tell if "Vicinity of Obscenity" is actually a single. I don't think it is, as it didn't chart, there isn't an article about it, and the Hypnotize album doesn't mention it as a single.

If these things can be resolved, I think this could easily be a featured article. Thanks for your help, Xnux the Echidna 03:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

• Actually, there is another thing(s): the music video director for "War" (demo) [which is a pretty suspicious title, if you ask me...] has its director listed as "Unknown"... yeah, how should I fix this? Xnux the Echidna 03:54, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyediting request, please

Hello. I have recently been expressing large interest in getting the Croatia national football team article into the Featured Article material. I have had a few other peer reviews but further help from a copyedit has been recommended. The article is in desperate need of one, if you could please copyedit it then it would be largely appreciated by me and all the authors of the article. It is a very high quality page, its just these small things letting it down. I'll be hoping to hear from you. THANKS IN ADVANCE! Domiy (talk) 10:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kid Kilowatt - Hit Single.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kid Kilowatt - Hit Single.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Second Nature Recordings.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Second Nature Recordings.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality Tag

Hello,

I have added a tag to the Barack Obama article requesting that it be checked for neutrality. Since you’re a peer review volunteer I thought you might be interesting in coming in as a neutral editor and checking the article out. QuirkyAndSuch (talk) 10:17, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Copy-edit request

Hey. I was just wondering if you could please copy-edit the Pilot (30 Rock) article. It's been suggested at its FAC that it should go under a copy-edit throughout. Thanks for any help. -- ^[User]Jamie JCA_[Talk] 17:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)