User talk:QuirkyAndSuch

Welcome!

Hello, QuirkyAndSuch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers 13:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

I fixed up your userpage a bit. Hope this helps. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 16:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Sugarcult

Hey, I noticed that you wrote on the Sugarcult talk page regarding the lack of a Tim Pagnotta article. As you can see from the links, I've cleaned up and rearranged/rewritten most of the Sugarcult article, and created a Tim Pagnotta article. It's a little thin on content at the moment though.. I've also cleaned up the Marko 72 and Airin Older pages (no page for Kenny or Ben yet). Just thought that you might be interested! Apollosfire 18:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review on Sia's album

Hi, you said about adding the review to the Some people have real problems page, well, either i can do it for you or i can show you how, its up 2 u Breathe again (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tri-Cities, WA

I didn't "add" the Tri-Cities to the Washington template. It existed in previous versions of the template. I merely restored it after it was deleted by another editor without consensus. I provided a rationale on the talk page (and noted this in the edit summary), although apparently you didn't see that note. It's right above yours. Apparently other editors agree with me; at least, Matt Yeager does, as he kept the Tri-Cities in the template and moved it to the fourth position on the list. I still maintain that it belongs there. I know it doesn't meet the legal definition of a city, but it is culturally defined and accepted as a city in Washington, and I see no reason to privilege the legal definition over the cultural definition. In an ideal world, it would be listed as a "metro area," but we don't have such a section on the template. I know it's not a perfect solution, but the Tri-Cities is more of a "city" than a "region." Feel free to take it up again on the talk page or edit the template if you disagree. Maybe we could ask other editors to step in to come to some consensus? Northwesterner1 (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help with user

Hi, QaS. The first step is to read Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. If nothing there seems suitable to the situation, then you may want to try a Request for Comment, which would be a way to determine if the situation is one that merits more formal action. Powers ^T 20:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Rodham Clinton FAC

Hello. Since you were the nominator for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hillary Rodham Clinton, you should be active during the discussions there. You also should help out fixing some of the mundane formatting problems usually brought up during FAC, such as the references problems noted by Ealdgyth. Wasted Time R (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Executive Official

I'm not entirely sure what you are referring to in your comments. Can you please clarify (please put your comments immediately after the section to which they pertain for the sake of clarity). If you need to split my comments to make it more clear, you have my blessing. — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I responded to your comment. Have a nice day! — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC query

Please follow up here; I am not an admin, I believe you are misunderstanding policy, but Blnguyen will be able to answer your questions. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the heads up

ill try and see what i can do.

Wikifan12345 (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please do not make personal attacks, as you did here. Thank You.Scientus (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Costcoconnection.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Costcoconnection.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tyler Young.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tyler Young.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:45, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]