User talk:Secularyear2023

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Manoj Kumar Singh, you may be blocked from editing. The outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Kumar Singh was clear. Don't move pages around again to try to recreate the article. Wikishovel (talk) 16:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with one of the pages you edited. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion for Ankur Sharma

I have declined your speedy deletion request for Ankur Sharma. Notability is not a speedy deletion criteria. Also, the article survived its most recent AFD and is not eligible for speedy deletion. Please read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at IkkJutt Jammu. Your disruptive editing must stop. Hijacking a redirect to point to a completely inappropriate target is not acceptable. Whpq (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manoj Kumaar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manoj Kumaar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Manoj Kumaar. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Secularyear2023 - I know these templated messages can look automated and confusing, but it's a real human here! :) Let me know if I can help. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 18:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]