User talk:SebyTimmy8

July 2024

Hello, SebyTimmy8! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that this account may be used by multiple people. Sharing accounts is prohibited on Wikipedia, and those who do may be blocked from editing. If there are multiple people sharing this account, please make them log out and create an account. Additionally, please change the password on this account. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 08:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We won’t share. SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When we were trying to log in, why did it say it was stopped due to hjacking, we are not hjacking? SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "we" you're admitting to sharing an account. Drmies (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We did not know until you told us that sharing is not allowed. Now I will stop. SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to make an article.

I am trying to make an article about a Reddit user called Holiday_Accident_414 but how do I make it public? SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no content in that draft. Obviously it needs content, and it needs solid secondary sourcing to prove that someone is notable by our standards if they're a Reddit user and nothing else. Drmies (talk) 19:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It contains content about the Reddit user. SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - It didn't contain content when I looked at it--oh, wait. You managed to type the content into the <!--> code, which is for comments that shouldn't be seen unless one is editing. I read the content and will tweak it, resubmit, and give a final evaluation. We are an encyclopedia, not social media. Drmies (talk) 22:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holiday Accident 414 (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holiday Accident 414 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I thought there was text in it, I put text. Why are people using the “x” to say no if the x was meant to be a Latin letter. SebyTimmy8 (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's an X mark. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SebyTimmy8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need to reset my screen time passcode.

This is because for some reason there is a time limit on Safari and I can’t access other Wiki’s. Can you please ask Apple to put the reset screen time passcode button on my talk page? SebyTimmy8 (talk) 18:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if you vandalize Wikipedia?

I wonder what happens if you vandalize Wikipedia or add inappropriate edits. What will happen? SebyTimmy8 (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does “naked vandalism” mean in Wikipedia? SebyTimmy8 (talk) 18:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SebyTimmy8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some person gave us that name because they did not know and now there is only one person despite the username SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU confirmed sockpuppetry. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help

I am trying to appeal to the block but it says that it could not be found, help. SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It said that it got blocked due to it being a sock puppet of another user.

I was blocked but not using the sock puppet account to evade blocks because on that account, it was not blocked. SebyTimmy8 (talk) 19:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]