This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I've been looking back over your (and the others') nomination. I was just wondering how the mediation has been going, since you said that it has been taken to e-mail and is not being mediated on-wiki. Thanks so much in advance. -^demon[yell at me]15:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's your birthday! Your birthday is today! Have a Happy, Happy, Happy, Happy Birthday! And I won't sing again for another year. I promise. Dfrg.msc1 . 2 . 321:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are ageless imortals entitled to Birthdays (you'd get a pretty vast stack of pressies I guess), have a great one regardless. --Alfmelmac13:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just needed to know how to deactivate the bot if needed. You see, during an IRC discussion we had, most of us got distracted. (constantly ordering drinks, activating WineSteward's random phrases, etc.)--Ed¿Cómo estás?17:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I want to congratulate you and show that I appreciate that you created WikiProject Awareness. Good job.
Second of all, I want to criticize your User page, because anytime I try to look at differences, the text somehow blocks me out. If this is intentional, it doesn't work out for me. One important part of anti-vandalism is looking at differences in editing. When I saw "Wiki*edia", I thought of vandalism, but I couldn't check. May you change this? -Slash-04:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is my pleasure to announce that after great consideration, you have been accepted as a member of the Mediation Committee. I encourage you to place the Mediation Committee page and Requests for Mediation on your watchlist, as well as the open tasks page, which will be updated as new cases are accepted. You may also (and are encouraged to) join the Committee's internal mailing list. (Please email me directly so I can confirm your email before subscribing it.) If you have any questions about how the committee functions, please feel free to ask me. Congratulations on becoming a member! Essjay(Talk)05:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
Your wikipedia id is 'Mapletip', so use it! You are afraid people will realise your hidden agendas? :D
You have repeatedly been warned to stop vandalising articles on Wikipedia when you came here using other IPs. You have returned and continued that vandalism. You have now been blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you make further attempts to vandalise articles when the block expires, you may be subject to a longer block. All vandalising edits you make will be quickly reverted.
you sent me that message.......i've never edited anything in wikipedia ever....can u please show me what u r talking about thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.78.148.16 (talk • contribs).
The vandalism warning was from me, yes, however the message above the ruled line (which I added on your talkpage) is not from me, and it appears that someone else posted it. Thanks. —Xyrael / 09:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WHeimbigner has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. This shortened late issue covers just global tropical cyclone activity in November, to prevent the next newsletter from being too large.
Tropical cyclone activity
One hurricane, Hurricane Sergio, formed in the eastern Pacific. Sergio was the longest lasting November Pacific hurricane recorded. Two other tropical cyclones, Tropical Storm Rosa and a tropical depression formed in the basin. None of the systems affected land.
A total of three typhoons formed in the western Pacific, and all the storms followed a similar track across the Philippines. Typhoon Cimaron formed at the end of October and lasted into November, killing 19 people. Typhoon Chebi existed during the middle of the month and was the weakest of the three causing minor damages. The most devastating storm of the month, Typhoon Durian hit the Philippines on November 30, killing at least 720 people in the island nation.
Two named cyclones developed in the Southern Hemisphere, Tropical Cyclone Yani in the South Pacific and Moderate Tropical Storm Anita in the Southwest Indian Ocean. Two unnamed depression also formed in the South Pacific. None of these storms affected land.
Editorial
The lateness of this edition is due to me being on an wikibreak and no-one taking up the slack. My wikibreak was the result of a lightning strike damaging my internet connection and frying my router, and the time taken for the replacement to arrive. As this issue is almost 3 weeks later than planned, only the monthly cyclone activity for November has been included. The next letter will be produced for January 7, 2006 and will be larger than normal to cover both month's Wikipedia news and December's tropical activity. There will be no Member or Storm of the month in January, to reduce the length; and the newsletter will return to normal in February.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Xyrael, I had left a memo for you last week and it looks like you didn't notice it. I can't resend it at the moment because it says that you have reached your maximum memo limit. Tintin (talk) 02:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good evening (GMT time); I hope you're having a nice night. Just dropping by to let you know I've posted my nomination at the Meditation Committee nominations area, in the event that you choose to support, oppose or otherwise comment on my nomination.
Good afternoon (GMT time); firstly I would like to thank you for your support at my Meditation Committee nomination - I acknowledge it with thanks.
On the note of Med Com nominations, I am currently sourcing the requested evidence of my AMA and Med Cabal cases but the task is proving more difficult than expected - the AMA archive appears to either be in complete disrepair or else does not exist.
However, rest assured I am trying my utmost to source the required evidence that you require. If there is anything else you need to know, please don't hesitate to ask.
Good evening; I have sourced as much evidence as I can over my chosen evidence case, to no avail. Therefore, I have posted a description of the case at the WP:MEDCOM page, which I hope proves satisfactory enough to your standards in order to convince you to edit your stance on my nomination to Support.
If I can provide you with any more information, please don't hesitate to leave me a message at my talk page.
My name is Garrett123, and i have a question for you.i am what most people call a "Skateboarder", and i was brushing up on my skateboarding trivia when i stumbled across an article on Tony Alva. the article said he died in march 2006. however, i have mostly heard he is still alive. can you doudle check for me? Thank you.Garrett12319:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Garrett123[reply]
Good evening; I have replied at my talk page regarding the AMA case evidence. I'd like to point out that I am unwilling to disclose the Google conversations because they contain private data - any private data will be required to be blacked out.
Hi there Xyrael, I appreciate you taking care of that. Since Esperanza is no longer, it seems appropriate for it to be inactive, thank you for setting that correctly. Unfortunately, I have little idea of how to go about IRC things, so if I wanted to I doubt that I could figure out how to use that command to go about continuing my work, but I don't think it should matter. :) Thanks again! -- Natalya23:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
