Jump to content

User talk:Seagull123/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Il disprezzo

I've linked this article to Wikipedias in five other languages and added some referenced critiques. The synopsis is my own work. OK? Clifford Mill (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

That's great, thank you Clifford Mill!  Seagull123  Φ  19:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RainPearl/sandbox/Team Shanghai Alice (new version)

A tag has been placed on RainPearl/sandbox/Team Shanghai Alice (new version) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RainPearl/sandbox/Reimu Hakurei

A tag has been placed on RainPearl/sandbox/Reimu Hakurei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigel Farage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Letters of last resort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief of the Defence Staff. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for feedback on ShopStyle addition

I just wanted to thank you for your feedback on my ShopStyle page creation. I really, really appreciate that you took the time to respond to my edit notes. I'm an on and off editor, so every time I venture into something new, I'm a bit insecure about it all. Without people like you, I'd be a lot more lost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TineWiki (talk • contribs) 09:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@TineWiki: Smiley You're welcome! Your comments made me smile . I'm glad I managed to help you, and if you need any more help or anything, I'd be glad to do so!  Seagull123  Φ  16:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Chill Bill

Why did you delete Chill Bill??? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 00:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: I tagged Chill Bill for deletion under criterion A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, with Anthony Bradbury later deleting it. Criterion A9 says that "any article about a musical recording or list of musical recordings where none of the contributing recording artists has an article and that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant" may be deleted. The recording artists of Chill Bill didn't have articles themselves, and the Chill Bill article didn't indicate why it was important. That's the reason I applied the deletion template. If you want to write the article again, maybe write a draft first, or use the Article Wizard. Hopefully this answered your question.  Seagull123  Φ  18:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

REQUEST TO REVIEW MY PAGE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSAMA_CHANDIO — Preceding unsigned comment added by TV WEB NETWORK (talk • contribs) 13:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi again, @TV WEB NETWORK, the article OSAMA CHANDIO doesn't, at the moment, explain how the subject of the article is significant or important. All articles on Wikipedia, especially those about living people, must be about notable subjects, and be verifiable with reliable sources. A notable person is someone who "has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", and I don't believe that Osama Chandio has received significant coverage. I do think that the Your First Article page is a good read, and will explain clearly about writing good articles on Wikipedia. And then, if you wish to write another article, I do think that you should use the Article Wizard as this will allow you to receive feedback on the new article before it is published. Hopefully you'll continue editing and contributing to Wikipedia! But if you need any more help, feel free to ask me another question. Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  13:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

please will you review my page [Mehran TV News]]TV WEB NETWORK (talk) 13:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

As a thank you for helping Bharath9856 with their questions. :-) Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@Zackmann08: Thank you for that cookie! It's no problem helping people ;-)  Seagull123  Φ  17:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

RiskAoA review

Hi Seagull- would you mind reviewing RiskAoA it has been selected as a candidate for deletion, and you seem to have a good finger in the wind for the issues brought up. Thank you. 74.96.151.44 (talk) 03:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

talk pages

Hello, Seagull123! I'm the person who started the regency discussion on the Charles VIII page. I use a university computer, so I just saw your message and thought I'd ask you about the talk pages. About four years ago, on the Sherlock Holmes page, I took issue on the talk page with a person who was insisting that Holmes' age was different from the one given by Doyle. There was a great deal of discussion on the talk page; people agreed with me and then the entire subject was deleted from the talk page. It remains wrong in the article to this day. Recently, I mentioned on the talk page for Charles VIII that there was a major error, saying that Charles had a regent. He didn't. The same mistake exists on the Anne of France page. This is a serious error. One of the people who regularly edits for Wikipedia, Whaleyland, who actually is a history professor, didn't necessarily agree with me, but gave a well-informed explanation. To this day, the article remains as it was. My point is that I don't understand the purpose of the talk pages if they don't result in important changes being made in the actual article. You don't have to agree with my opinion, since I'm not an expert on French history, but I think the actual articles should be edited by people who have some minimal knowledge about the subject and don't simply rely on Google. If you could do something about this, it would be helpful.

Thanks for your response. Navigating all the different pages is confusing, but I'll try one of the links you posted. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.95.1.238 (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you, 131.95.1.238 (talk) 20:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Dana Gower

Hi @131.95.1.238, let me start by saying I'm not an expert on French history either, and I haven't read the article in question (I've had a quick look at it though). The point of talk pages is "to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page" (WP:TPG), so make sure you have asked editors on the talk page first, before taking further action to change the article elsewhere. You also mention another editor with whom you had discussion, I would suggest you bring it up with them at their talk page, as I am not involved in this discussion. If you feel that there is still no correction or change taking place, have a look at the accuracy dispute guideline, which aims to give information on what to do when an article is factually incorrect. If the first few sections on that page haven't resolved this problem, then have a look at the dispute resolution page, which "describes what to do when you have a dispute with another editor". Finally, to your point that "articles should be edited by people who have some minimal knowledge about the subject", note that "anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism" (WP:ABOUT). This is one of the core principles, or "five pillars", of Wikipedia. But if this is something you wish to make Wikipedia policy, visit the village pump, where you can discuss ideas for Wikipedia. This is all I can do for you, hopefully it helped, but if it didn't, click here to ask another question, or just leave another message on this page. Thank you,  Seagull123  Φ  10:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
@131.95.1.238, Smiley You're welcome! And if you do need any more help, just ask!  Seagull123  Φ  22:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Seagull123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Kremer

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Markdask (talk • contribs) 01:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Markdask, can I ask why you added the section header above, would you like some help with something?  Seagull123  Φ  19:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Seagull - thanks but nope the above was entirely inadvertant - I sometimes have several pages open same time - this header belongs on another page. Apols for the confusion. MarkDask 00:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
@Markdask: OK, don't worry, thanks for the reply!  Seagull123  Φ  21:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your help

Dear Seagull123 Hope you are fine, idon't know why the article of Bilal Abdallah Alayli will be removed immediatly, what could we do in this case, could you help me. Your help will be highly apreciated. Thanks in advance and best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mharfouche (talk • contribs) 20:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Mharfouche, sorry for the late reply, and at the moment it doesn't look like the article will be deleted. Can I ask for what reason the article was going to be deleted? Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  20:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Message from Ronaldcameron

Thanks, That's very helpful. I needed to reply to a question posed by another editor with a mutual interest in something I wrote. Happy New Year when it comes Ronaldcameron (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ronaldcameron, I'm glad I was able to help you! If you need any more help, feel free to just ask me for it. And also, a very happy new year to you to!  Seagull123  Φ  21:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi why have you requested to delete Jamie bacon article ?

Hi why have you requested to delete Jamie bacon artical ? Phoenixedwards (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Phoenixedwards, at the moment, I believe that the Jamie bacon article is currently located, as a draft, at Draft:Jamie Bacon. However, the article which I requested be deleted was because it was "an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist[ed] only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article" (see here). Seeing that it was deleted in July last year, I can't remember exactly what the problem was, but it was likely that there was very little text on the article. You may wish to contact the administrator who actually deleted the article, PhilKnight, as well. I would recommend that you work on the draft that you have already edited, (Draft:Jamie Bacon), then click the blue "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page when you believe the draft is finished. Also, make sure you read Your First Article which explains everything you need to create a good Wikipedia article. If you need anymore help, please just leave another message on this page, or just click here to ask a question. Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  14:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your help regarding Hollywood_Pinball! It is greatly appreciated. Sadly no one had the answer but still, thanks! TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome TheSandDoctor! Sorry no one found any sources for you, and if I understood anything about video games I would have helped, but I don't really know anything about that sort of thing. If you need any more help, just let me know.  Seagull123  Φ  21:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Entrepreneurship: Case Study of Genesis International llc Oman

Thank you for patrolling new pages. Please do not clog up the AfD process with articles that are blatant spam. CSD them instead. That said, perhaps you lack the reqired experience for patrollng pages. The instructions are at WP:NPR. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Thank you for your message. On the CSD criteria, WP:G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion), the criteria for spam, it says "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." There are references at the bottom of the page, (however, I still do not believe it is notable enough), also, it is not exclusively promotional. I did not believe there was a CSD criteria that adequately fit this article, so I tagged it for AfD, as this would allow a consensus to be reached about the fate of the article. Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  17:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Helper

thanks for helping me ok Tren Ligero GDL (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello My Username Is

Boeing329
. For More Details See My Userpage And Talkpage. Add Any Comments On My Talkpage. User:Boeing329—Preceding undated comment added 20:41, 1 May 2017‎ (UTC)
@Boeing329, thanks for your message. Is there a question you would like to ask?  Seagull123  Φ  20:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank You For The Message! You Are Awarded This Boeing329 (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much Boeing329. If you need any help ever, just let me know.  Seagull123  Φ  21:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Friendly Trophy

Trophy Of Friends
Thank You! I Appreciate This By Awarding You This Boeing329 (talk) 16:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Seagull123/Archive_4&oldid=1143294429"