User talk:Scotanist

Welcome!

Hello, Scotanist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 10:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brassinosteroid Insensitive-1

I've moved your draft to Draft:Brassinosteroid Insensitive-1 where you can work on it until it's ready for publication. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 10:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not ready but I'm not going to push my view as the only view. I've tagged it for the same projects that I found at Talk:Plant hormone so I hope you'll be able to get the right kind of help to develop the article further. The page needs to be added to categories. The links you've chosen to add seem strange to me, passing over the obvious plant hormones yet linking leucine-rich receptor-like protein kinase which is so specific & obscure that it's never likely to have an article. The lede needs to be more clear - you need to write for a general public, not an audience of biochemists. There's no harm in going in to detail later on but, as written, it's going to lose most readers before the end of the first sentence.

Regards, Cabayi (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention that the house style is not in favour of all-caps article titles. What you've linked as BRI1 KINASE INHIBITOR 1 would more likely be created as BRI1 Kinase Inhibitor 1. The Manual of Style is a good place to check. Cabayi (talk) 12:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback on the article. I'm conflicted about the house style regarding all-caps articles. I appreciate that wiki has a house style, but in the field of molecular biology there is a very specific nomenclature re caps and italics. E.g, BRI1 KINASE INHIBITOR 1 (BAK1) is a gene, BRI1 KINASE INHIBITOR 1 (BAK1) is a protein product of that gene, and bri1 kinase inhibitor 1 (bak1) is a version of the BAK1 gene that contains a mutation. Do you have any advice about what to do in this kind of situation? Using "BRI1 Kinase Inhibitor 1" is technically wrong, and may cause confusion for biology students.Scotanist (talk) 09:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll skip over the biology side of it (recognising the limits of my C-grade Biology O Level from 30+ years ago) and suggest:

Turn on HotCat, which you can find at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets, which will make it easier to...
Add some categories to the article, which in turn will make it easier to...
Find similar articles and see how they've handled it.
Ask at WT:MCB, or check the project's talk archives.
Refer to MOS:MCB, the style guide for this topic area.

If you find similar articles, you may want to check their Wikidata item, if they have one, which is linked in the list of links on the left hand side of the page. I had a look at wikidata for BRI1... items, it looks like you're the first in this area. The wikidata info will automatically populate an {{Authority control}} template at the bottom of the page if you add it, and any infobox (MOS:MCB#Infoboxes) you may add.

While you're adjusting your preferences, you may like ProveIt which makes adding citations a lot easier. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 11:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you found quite a bit of that while I was typing my response. :-) Cabayi (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Battle of Sidley Green (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Battle of Sidley Green and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scotanist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]