User talk:ScotRail02
Welcome!
|
Requested Change of User Name, Thanks.
ScotRail02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Accept reason:
June 2018
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Edinburgh Airport. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrewgprout (talk) 06:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
November 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 170, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 380, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Real Time Trains proves this as does ScotRail’s internal documents. Again, I believe I have told you this previously, sourcing internal railway information is almost impossible as it is ‘private’.
- Good luck finding a source that’s all I’ll say. You won’t find one as it’s private information documents but like I say, try and find a 380 on those services and you won’t, because they’re not diagramed outside of the Strathclyde area anymore.
- Cheers. ScotRail02 (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Then the reply is very simple - if there is no source, then it doesn't belong on Wikipedia, full stop. Danners430 (talk) 17:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- So you’re making Wikipedia deliberately inaccurate then? ScotRail02 (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I also noticed you vandalised the North Berwick Line page. Removing someone’s hard work like that is really unacceptable. 5,000 characters. No need. The page is now pretty much useless and may as well be deleted. Perhaps you should investigate such processes?
- I and several others also note your continual vandalism to railway related pages on Wikipedia. It has not gone unnoticed. By your own admission, you are deliberately removing anything you don’t like and in doing so, you are continually destroying pages and leaving them littered with errors. Wikipedia is supposed to be a site with accurate information and your actions are making it miles off accurate. In fact, so inaccurate that someone who comes here to learn will in fact learn what is effectively a lie, caused solely by your decision to pursue an agenda of inaccuracy.
- You will be reported for this. It is unacceptable. ScotRail02 (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- So we're making threats now? Well, go ahead… and while you're at it, I recommend reading WP:TRUTH. Danners430 (talk) 19:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Then the reply is very simple - if there is no source, then it doesn't belong on Wikipedia, full stop. Danners430 (talk) 17:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)