User talk:ScifaxEditor

This is ScifaxEditor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scifax Technology and Publishing Private Limited (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scifax Technology and Publishing Private Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScifaxEditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Scifax Technology and Publishing Private Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Scifax Technology and Publishing Private Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

ScifaxEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

UmanathPhD (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

I understand that "ScifaxEditor" violates Wikipedia's username policy. I would like to continue editing with a compliant username. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. ScifaxEditor (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=UmanathPhD | 3=I understand that "ScifaxEditor" violates Wikipedia's username policy. I would like to continue editing with a compliant username. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. ScifaxEditor (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}

[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=UmanathPhD | reason=I understand that "ScifaxEditor" violates Wikipedia's username policy. I would like to continue editing with a compliant username. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. ScifaxEditor (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

[reply]

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=UmanathPhD | reason=I understand that "ScifaxEditor" violates Wikipedia's username policy. I would like to continue editing with a compliant username. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. ScifaxEditor (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

[reply]

@Elli: Would you be able to take care of this soft block? Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 17:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScifaxEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that "ScifaxEditor" violates Wikipedia's username policy. I would like to continue editing with a compliant username. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. ScifaxEditor (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 17:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
- You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means it is available.

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScifaxEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that "ScifaxEditor" violates Wikipedia's username policy. I would like to continue editing with a compliant username. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. ScifaxEditor (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 17:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, you have made the same unblock request three times, which is not necessarily helpful. It could be good to clarify which new username you want to use, as well as which kind of edits you would make when unblocked. Since your previous draft was speedily deleted for being purely promotional, it will also help your chances if you could reassure the administrator processing the unblock request that you are not here exclusively to advertise your business. Also dropping Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide which is always a useful read. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock request will be reviewed by an administrator when one becomes available. Multiple requests will not speed up the process, nor will it affect the result. Please realize that there is a long queue of unblock requests, and that administrators (like all other Wikipedia users) are volunteers. There is no deadline by which your request will be reviewed. It may take days or even weeks before an administrator evaluates your request, so please be patient and wait your turn. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]