User talk:Scientist leghari

Welcome!

Hello, Scientist leghari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Asif leghari's theory of Electromagnetic Relativity, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! smileguy91^talk 14:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC) {{helpme}}Scientist leghari (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No question! I assume you are referring to the deleted articles? Wikipedia is not a publisher - all articles are based on data previous published by reliable sources. Any thing else is original research and it not suitable for a Wikipedia article. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif leghari's theory of Electromagnetic Relativity

A tag has been placed on Asif leghari's theory of Electromagnetic Relativity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is an essay; see WP:NOTESSAY

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. smileguy91^talk 14:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asif's unification force law

The article Asif's unification force law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any references to this concept in Google or Google scholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 04:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

please improve my article, i have provided references their. My page has good references. I request not to delet my page

Scientist leghari (talk) 04:34, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been speedily deleted since it was created while you were evading a block. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Princeneil. Huon (talk) 05:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scientist leghari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why my page has been deleted? Since I have provided a good references in my page. Please unblock my account. I have requested many of you but no one is ready to help my article. Only thing that you do is to just delet my article. Need help

Decline reason:

Given your persistent sockpuppetry and your repeated recreation of articles that violate WP:OR, I doubt you have the capability to positively contribute to Wikipedia. Kinu ^t/_c 05:34, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.