User talk:Science of truth

February 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of surgery into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 11:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have gave attribution to obiwana for his work Science of truth (talk) 11:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Obiwana per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Obiwana. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Science of truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I confirmly apologize for what I did before.I am just prevention vandalism in wikipedia but I didn't read the Wikipedia guidelines properly so I did sockpuppetry and I promise that I can't do it again.I can't login to my original account of obiwana since I forgot the password of this account.I admire that my previous mistakes did vandalised wikipedia page but I won't do this mistake ever again in the wiki page.Please forgive me and I do follow the Wikipedia guidelines properly and Dont do sockpuppetry again. Science of truth (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I kind of doubt that you lost the password. You logged into the Obiwana account months after this one was created, just a couple weeks ago. Also, your English language proficiency is not quite good enough to edit English Wikipedia. You should edit the version of Wikipedia in your native language. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.