User talk:Scholartop/Archives/2022/September

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Scholartop. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Scholartop, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sahaib (talk) 08:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Sahaib,

I hope you are doing well. Thank you so much for your message. It is great pleasure for me to be a Wikipedian and stay in touch with you. Thank you so much for your guidance. (~~~~); Scholartop (talk) 10:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Black-Scholes Model + Expected Return

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for undertaking the task of trying to correct grammar in Wikipedia articles. However, I noticed you have made numerous attempts to edit Black-Scholes model to change the phrase "expected return" into "expected to return". Within finance, expected return is an appropriate term with definite meaning. I undid this revision a few times in the text, please take a look at the comments on edits before you redo an edit you made before. Zfeinst (talk) 08:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Dear Zfeinst,

I hope you are doing well, and thank you for your message. To be honest, I worked on random articles and did not pay attention to which page I had edited before. I thought when someone would undo a revision, he would inform me on my talk page. Sorry for disturbing you. Scholartop (talk) 08:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ordinal Priority Approach (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dodger67 were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Don't tell how important/good/neccessary the subject is. Let the readers form their own opinions from the bare facts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ordinal Priority Approach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

I will apply your comment carefully. Thank you. Scholartop (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Scholartop! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)