Jump to content

User talk:Schierbecker/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Collaboration and advice on sources

Hello, Schierbecker! I would like to start contributing content to articles about artillery and armored fighting vehicles. I notice that you have compiled an extensive list of reliable, in-depth sources; would the works of Fred Crismon make a good addition to the list? They are extremely detailed and available to read on OpenLibrary/Internet Archive. Huntthetroll (talk) 01:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Huntthetroll Yes, I agree that would make a good addition. Thank you for the suggestion. I'll add later as I am feeling unwell. Schierbecker (talk) 05:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between April and June 2024. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 05:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

WikiProject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Nyami Nyami, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

I saw the tag you added - I'll fix that before the TFA but it'll be several days before I get the chance. Hog Farm Talk 02:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hog Farm, thanks. I recently visited Fort Davidson (also stealth camped inside the earthworks of the fort). I was surprised from reading the Battle of Glasgow article that the Confederates regarded Pilot Knob as a loss? I've never read explicitly otherwise, but I did know that Price very deludedly thought the campaign as a whole was an outstanding success. Schierbecker (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Does this resolve your concern with the lack of clarity? I've visited Fort Davidson myself, but it's been a couple years. The battle article is on my list of things to try to bring to FA eventually. The battle is considered to be a Confederate defeat due to the lopsided casualties and the later effects it had on Price's campaign. Hog Farm Talk 23:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Yes, it does. Thanks. Schierbecker (talk) 02:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024