User talk:Scb steve

scb_steve is the designated representative for Bullshido.net, a martial-arts oriented website dedicated to discussing and exposing fradulent practioners of martial arts. The website is also a repository of information on training and conditioning for martial arts, with posts made by high level practioners of martial arts, including current/former professional fighters and upper-ranked instructors in numerous arts/systems.

Please visit bullshido.net for more information on terms such as "Bullshido", "McDojo", or any general inquiry into martial arts.

Greetings

Greetings! Thanks for the note. I'm generally very favourable towards Bullshido.com, because I agree with their premise that fraud is rampant in the modern teaching of martial arts, especially in Western T'ai Chi. There are so many incompetent, lazy, lying charlatans out there teaching T'ai Chi it would make your head spin. Since most don't even pretend to martial ability, I expect them to be under Bullshido's radar for the most part. Myself, I trained from a relatively young age (when they hit you more!) in Hong Kong and Shanghai and elsewhere with a very martially oriented school, so I have an idea of what the style should be.

I teach T'ai Chi kung and ch'i kung for employees, the general public, seniors and for patients in several hospitals, so I'll be looking in on the article you've created. I have some medical citations I will be adding, and feel free to raid our other articles for info. My first job will be to move the content from Martial Arts Therapy to Martial arts therapy to come in line with our naming conventions. Cheers, --Fire Star 20:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ashida Kim

The data about mr kim posted by felbeast is straight off his website.

PS :Whats your martial arts style

Image copyright problem with Image:F AshidaKim.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:F AshidaKim.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -SCEhard T 20:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:F AshidaKim2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:F AshidaKim2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -SCEhard T 20:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David "Race" Bannon

Wow, it's weird that the new article (nice job, BTW) doesn't show up at all in the searches. It may be a bug related to the quotation marks (although similar quotes do show up in searches) in the title. I'll do some research, and if I can't figure this one out we may have to go to the help desk. In the meantime, a dab page would be fine. I'm a little pressed for time right now, so if you don't get to it first, I'll try to set one up later this evening. --Fire Star 04:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. Looking things over here and at Bullshido.net, I'm thinking that with the exposure he's been getting it would perhaps be a good job to have an article on Samuel Browning, too. Regards, --Fire Star 06:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you may find the current discussion of verifiability and martial arts going on at Talk:Tai Chi Chuan interesting. --Fire Star 23:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current discussions

What I think happens is that people present their arguments and a neutral admin decides the issue based on a consensus of the arguments. Since the article has been recreated, that may even be the de facto end of the discussion, since no one seems to agree 100%. You can more firmly establish the longevity of the article by addressing the verifiability issue that keeps coming up. Link to news stories about Bannon, perhaps edit the article some to reduce overlap with McDojo, etc. --Fire Star 01:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration

Listing a deletion issue there is novel. I think deletion review runs for 7 days which we are still 1 day short of in the case of the various bits of bullshido stuff.Geni 21:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I may not have seen it if I wasn't an arbitrator myself (as you didn't notify). The deletion review listing seems to have closed normally, acording to proper procedure, and I'm not quite sure why you decided to take it to arbitration without simply waiting for an admin to conclude the listing, other than unfamiliarity with our dispute resolution process. Arbitration is last, meaning that typically you wil have to demonstrate that you've exhausted other venues like mediaion or WP:RFC beforehand. In this case, the issue is already solved, and there wasn't even really a conflict, just a difference of opinion, for which I have to problem complying with community consensus on. We could wait for weeks for arbitrators to reject the case, but (as an arbitrator trying to save us time) I'd like to politely ask for you to withdraw your premature request voluntarily. We can talk about this more if you're still unclear about anything. Thanks, and also, welcome to Wikipedia. :-) Dmcdevit·t 07:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse what Dmcdevit says - please consider withdrawing your request to save us all time. Stifle (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for withdrawing your request. I have removed the case from the arbitration page. Stifle (talk) 13:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yellowbambooswedish.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yellowbambooswedish.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:10, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts

You are listed as a participant in this Wikiproject, which appears to have ground to a halt - I'm contacting all participants to try to get things rolling again... hope you can help! -- Medains 08:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Bullshido.net article is just an ad

Friend, this article here on bullshido.net is not nuetral. It makes it sound as if the bullshido.net people have the knowledge and authority to judge what is bullshit or not, without questioning their ability to do this. I don't understand how this seems objective to you. I see these points have been raised before, and you've dealt with them, but they need to be dealt with as they have some validity--or is "your" article perfect and cannot be un-edited? I can copy/paste just as many times as you, so I suggest we come to some kind of compromise in the interest of fairness.

Removing maintenance templates

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages, as you did to Bullshido, unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --Muchness 23:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger

Greetings. Unfortunately, I was on a little wiki-break the last few days. I will look in at the article you asked me about in the next day or so... --Fire Star 火星 19:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keichu D

What a mess, have started doing bits, lots of fact tags & then asking for secondary sources tends to build up a head (if not provided) that the article is not notable, or gets severely trimmed, also removed worst add bit, the school listings. more to do though... --Nate 07:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion going on about Marx's qualifications and Bullshido's evidence on the KD talk page. I invite you to participate. Iscariot 14:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freud-Lee.JPEG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Freud-Lee-JPEG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pete.Hurd 14:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me write this article?

Hello,

I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bullshido.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bullshido.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. east.718 13:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ashida Kim

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ashida Kim, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it ever comes up again, you may be interested to know that an article which has been through the AfD process isn't eligible for the proposed deletion process. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bullshido

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bullshido, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshido. Thank you. Horrorshowj (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The link provided by this user leads to a closed discussion, can you confirm whether this article is up for deletion or not? -- Iscariot (talk) 00:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: David "Race" Bannon may be deleted from Wikipedia. There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David "Race" Bannon . The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for David "Race" Bannon : google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. If your page is encyclopedic, list the page on Article Rescue Squadron by adding:

{{rescue}} below:

on the David "Race" Bannon page.

You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Race Bannon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Race Bannon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Keichu Do

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Keichu Do. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keichu Do. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]