Jump to content

User talk:Scarecroe/Archive02

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kim Wilson (writer)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kim Wilson (writer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kim Wilson (writer). Jfire (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i don't understand why that information can't be included. When the character of Snuffleupagus appeared on Robot Chicken he was voiced by Dan Milano and when the character of Fozzie was on Family Guy he was voiced by Michael Clarke Duncan. How is that any differnt from listing the other voice actors that have voiced the characters in other shows? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newbie27 (talkcontribs) 22:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because Snuffleupagus never appeared on Robot Chicken. The writers of that show parodied the character. It has nothing to do with Sesame Workshop's property other than make a joke about the source, lists of which have been decided as non-notable. —scarecroe (talk) 22:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So? The fictional character of Snuffleupagus was voiced by Dan Milano in an appearance on Robot Chicken. The page is about the fictional character of Snuffleupagus. It might not be a canonical appearance of Snuffleupagus or on endorsed by the Sesame Street producers but it is a performance and appearance of that fictional character in a notable production. That's like saying Paul Giamatti (Fred Claus) or Tim Allen (The Santa Clause) didn't actually portray Santa Claus because their portrayals were parodies or tongue-in-cheek versions of that character and not sanctioned by original creator of Santa or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newbie27 (talkcontribs) 22:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not interested in discussing this on my talk page. Please feel free to open up the conversation on the article talk page. —scarecroe (talk) 23:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(So you know Scarecroe, they've now been officially warned.) -- Zanimum (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SineBot Spam

[edit]

A user attempting to maintain anonymity (myself), deleted the random message the above "bot" seems to attach to anonymous messages. You reverted that deletion. Is this an honest mistake, or do you have a problem with my choice to be anonymous? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.67.68 (talk) 04:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're no more or less anonymous with or without the signature there. Sorry for the confusion. —scarecroe (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is constantly evolving, not merely in its collection of literature, but also in the underlying software. I'm confident that a future update will clear up the mistake of publicly noting IP addresses with edits, and in preparation I'd like to curtail the activity of scripts in the spirit of SineBot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.67.68 (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Have Rollback?

[edit]

Hey, Scarecroe! Glad to be talking to you on the main Wikipedia. I was in the Special:Listusers page; I typed your name in and I saw that you have rollback. I didn't know that until now, when I last saw it. I also have the feature, in which I requested for it on 17 January, 2008. Well, the whole reason I'm posting this comment is because I haven't noticed that you had RB until today, when I saw it to the right of your username on the page. I use rollback to revert vandalism and leave warnings on the vandals' talk pages. How do you use rollback and when did you get it (or requested it)? SchfiftyThree 00:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Themyscira-floating.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Themyscira-floating.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LesleyAnnWarren-LoisLane.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LesleyAnnWarren-LoisLane.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sillysymphony-grasshopper ant.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sillysymphony-grasshopper ant.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AtTheMovies.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AtTheMovies.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the Movies

[edit]

Glad to see you found a home for your screencap of At the Movies by creating At the Movies with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. Unfortunately, based on references I just added to the new article you created, the show's name never included the name of the hosts, screen capture contents notwithstanding. The show continued for four years with other hosts (as noted in the article). I've worked around the problem in a few places but would appreciate it if you were to rename it appropriately. Since there's an Australian show by the same name, it'll need a qualifier of some sort: if you follow existing conventions, options include At the Movies (U.S. TV series), At the Movies (1982 TV series), or At the Movies (Tribune TV series). Thanks. 67.100.127.183 (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Other wikis

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:V#Self-published_sources. Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, and then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable. This is an open wiki and cannot be used as citation for anything. I could very easily login there and edit it to read anything I wanted. If the actual sources on that wiki meet the requirements laid out by WP:V and WP:RS here then source those directly.--Crossmr (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this, I do not get involved in deletion review because it's too stressful. Bearian (talk) 22:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again...

[edit]

Please read WP:V and WP:RS before continuing to edit wikipedia. Self-published source, like those removed from the Muppet (slang) article are not usable for citation on wikipedia. If you want to restore or include the content that was removed please find and provide appropriate sources which meet the polices and guidelines laid out on wikipedia. In addition you should read Wikipedia:Rollback_feature#When_to_use_Rollback as it seems you are not clear on when you should be using such a tool as you clearly reintroduced text which violates wikipedia policy.--Crossmr (talk) 02:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Disneytreasures-boxset.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Disneytreasures-boxset.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kim Wilson (disambiguation), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kim Wilson (disambiguation) is a disambiguation page that only points to a single article, or no articles at all.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kim Wilson (disambiguation), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Muppet fan?

[edit]

You a Muppet fan too, huh? Angie Y. (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney-WitchHazel.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney-WitchHazel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leonardmaltin-disneytreasures.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leonardmaltin-disneytreasures.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. liquidlucktalk 22:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello Scarecroe, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on June 16 2009, HAL 9000 in popular culture, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:A Radish for Boris (page has mainspace links, and more than 49 edits). This has been done because the page is an almost identical copy of a page deleted via a deletion discussion (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:A Radish for Boris. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of A Radish for Boris (talk · contribs) 05:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MelissaDuck.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MelissaDuck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MelissaDuck.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MelissaDuck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hibernian-muppet-ad.gif

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hibernian-muppet-ad.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article HAL 9000 in popular culture is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HAL 9000 in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney-WitchHazel.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney-WitchHazel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Andrew Garfield, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-5- (talk) 06:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the polite message about test edits on Andrew Garfield. As you can see, the edit placed a line break tag into the article which was the desired result. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. —scarecroe (talk) 06:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MelissaDuck.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MelissaDuck.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

August 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Take Two with Phineas and Ferb. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ring2011 (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC) [reply]

File:Pluto-glass.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pluto-glass.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pigby (talk) 09:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo nwf.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo nwf.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Haz talk 14:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sonofsuperman.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonofsuperman.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Danielquinn-screenshot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. yabancım 14:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ww-sleep power.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ww-sleep power.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Disney-WitchHazel.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney-WitchHazel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Themyscira-pronounce.ogg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Themyscira-pronounce.ogg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deals with the Devil in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gonzo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of female film score composers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of female film score composers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female film score composers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Title.bigbigworld.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Title.bigbigworld.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scarecroe,

I have done some work on the Wikipedia page for the Australian Wilfred, and have been looking for a freely-licenced picture to use in the article, preferably showing all three main cast members. I noticed you uploaded some photographs to the Wilfred Wiki some time ago. I recognise most of them from promo shots, but some appear to be behind-the-scenes shots (like this set-piece from Dogs of War: http://wilfred.wikia.com/wiki/Dogs_of_War?file=AUepisode103.jpg). Are any of the images you uploaded freely licensed and could they be used in Wikipedia? Hope to hear from you soon, --Yeti Hunter (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Do you have a WP:Reliable source for Gold's exact date of birth? I have not seen it published anywhere reliable. See WP:V for more information. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Her Facebook. —scarecroe (talk) 16:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Circe-dccomics.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Circe-dccomics.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

[edit]

I have lodged a request for mediation on the J. Ralph page here. Karst (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Scarecroe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Title.frogprince.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Title.frogprince.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blaster Beam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Prince. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vanessa-Kapatelis.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vanessa-Kapatelis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Scarecroe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Please Stand By, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 12:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

[edit]

I really don't appreciate you using rollback on one of my edits that was not clear vandalism. I was enforcing the BLP policy. Your use of rollback is a violation of the policy, is considered misuse of the tool, and grounds for removal of the right from your account. Please do not do that again. --Majora (talk) 03:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings. —scarecroe (talk) 04:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emmet Otter's Jug-Band Christmas (TV program), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Scarecroe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mxyzptlk.PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mxyzptlk.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 06:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MelissaDuck.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MelissaDuck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]