User talk:Sbssmadhav

Welcome!

Hello, Sbssmadhav, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Theo polisme 11:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raagabox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raagabox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Theo polisme 11:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Abhogi ‎. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

I am not breaking any of the following guidelines for external links. I genuinely believe that the external links I added are of great value to the articles. When someone is learning about a raaga, there is nothing better than listening to music in that raaga. It's like describing a guitar and playing an audio of the instrument to show how the instrument sounds. I disagree that these links are inappropriate and request they be added back. Thank you.

"Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be used in the body of an article. All external links must conform to certain formatting restrictions. Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy."

I believe the spirit behind the guidelines for usage of External links has to be understood. Also, the exact expectations from the people at large, from any encyclopedia has to be understood. Here are some points to help people understand why external links of this nature are not appropriate.

( A ) Point 4 of Important points to remember from WP:EL states

In the "External links" section, try to avoid separate links to multiple pages in the same website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site.

As can be seen by additions you have made, this is clearly violated.

( B ) Point 9 of Links normally to be avoided from WP:EL states

Any search results pages, such as links to individual website searches, search engines, search aggregators, or RSS feeds.

As can be seen by additions you have made, each and every link is a "Search Results" page.

( C ) Point 10 of Links normally to be avoided from WP:EL states

Social networking sites (such as Myspace and Facebook), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or e-mail lists.

As can be seen, your website states clearly The Music Student Network.

( D ) Advertising and conflicts of interest from WP:EL states

It is obvious that a link from Wikipedia to an external site may drive Web traffic to that site. But in line with Wikipedia policies, you should avoid linking to a site that you own, maintain, or represent—even if Wikipedia guidelines seem to imply that it may otherwise be linked.

As it is your website, there is direct conflict of interest.

( E ) Finally point number 1 of Links normally to be avoided from WP:EL states

Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article.

Since there are 1000s (if not millions) of renditions of ragas and alapanas available on the web, NO SINGLE resource can claim to be UNIQUE to be included in a particular raga page. Here, it should be understood that unique resource means extra ordinary resource that is reliable and referenced by a 3rd party review/ article/ published paper, etc. This default expectation of encyclopedic content cannot be bypassed simply because it has not been mentioned in the WP:EL - it is implicit requirement that experts and 3rd parties feel that raagabox is THE standard for learning the raga - which clearly it is NOT. No one has certified this.

Hope in light of this you will stop promoting your website in Wikipedia articles. Thank you. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 07:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vasu, I don't agree with some of these sentiments and your comments but I respect your guys' judgment. Take care.

Hello, Sbssmadhav. You have new messages at Sbssmadhav's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sbrraghunathacharya2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sbrraghunathacharya2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Sbraghunathacharya.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sbraghunathacharya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Apjkalam and sbpadmasri.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Apjkalam and sbpadmasri.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 17:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sbssmadhav/sandbox

Hi Sbssmadhav! I noticed you submitted User:Sbssmadhav/sandbox to Articles for Creation. However, AFC submissions should usually be in the draft namespace. I would move it there myself, but I don't know what an appropriate title would be for the article. Just wanted to let you know. Quid Est Squid (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Quid, new to this, appreciate your help. It appears that Nathan2055 moved it to Draft. Sbssmadhav (talk) 20:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya, from its old location at User:Sbssmadhav/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S.B. Raghunathacharya (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, could you share what aspects need further verifiable sources. I have included sources for the awards, books he has authored. Is it possible to get specific items that require verifiable sources? Appreciate your help much. Thanks Sbssmadhav (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sbssmadhav! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S.B. Raghunathacharya (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see this guide for how to add citations. Also, external hyperlinks do not belong in the body of the article so need to either cited or removed keeping in mind commercial sites such as Amazon or Ebooks should not be used and only his most notable works (generally based on citation counts) should be listed. Please also see the the notability guidelines for acedemics.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S.B. Raghunathacharya (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

Please write a proper article in prose; see WP:NOTDIRECTORY#1: "Wikipedia articles are not simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit." Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S.B. Raghunathacharya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. B. Raghunathacharya (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S. B. Raghunathacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:S. B. Raghunathacharya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HenryTemplo The sources cited are reliable. Tirumala Tirupati Devastanams (TTD) is a highly reputed organization in India, there is even a very detailed Wikipage on the organization. All the books my father published through this organization as the Chief Editor are reliable and I have removed many other books that he had published due to lack of reliable sources. I'd appreciate specific links that you believe are NOT reliable, I can address that but saying vaguely that the submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources is of very little help. Thank you. Sbssmadhav (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirumala_Tirupati_Devasthanams Sbssmadhav (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been referring back to the predecessor to my father [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._S._Ramanuja_Tatacharya[, his page has no reliable references and it has been accepted. I am completely baffled at this point what meeds to be corrected. The Awards? The Book citations? They all have specific links to Government of India websites or TTD Publishing website. Sbssmadhav (talk) 18:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the "reliable sources" wikipedia page and I believe my references are reliable, like I mentioned they are from Government of India and Tirumala.org. If you can give me a clue as to which part of the page is citing unreliable source, e.g. Personal details I can either remove or edit with proper sources. Thank you. Sbssmadhav (talk) 18:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Sbssmadhav! Yes, you've (largely) addressed the issues raised in the review, but it's important to understand that in order for a source to prove notability, a source needs to be not only reliable, but also independent of the subject and covering the subject in non-trivial detail. Unfortunately, books which are written by the subject would not be considered independent. At present, the draft is largely supported by reliable sources (I think. not an expert on Indian media), so you'd be best addressing the other prose issues of the draft. Regardless, good luck with the draft and have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @HenryTemplo appreciate the feedback. I removed text from the prose that I do not have references for. Everything captured in prose is a fact supported by authentic references. Please let me know what else I can do to have this published, thank you for your help. Sbssmadhav (talk) 14:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Sbssmadhav, my suggestions at this point would be to consult the Manual of Style (WP:MOS) and ensure the draft follows the guidelines therein. However, I do not feel confident in reviewing this draft, so perhaps you may want to consult the relevant WikiProject (maybe WikiProject India?) and ask if someone there could review, as they may have knowledge about the sources (etc.) that I wouldn't. Have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 20:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sbraghunathacharya.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sbraghunathacharya.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. B. Raghunathacharya has been accepted

S. B. Raghunathacharya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. B. Raghunathacharya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. B. Raghunathacharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. B. Raghunathacharya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are right and I missed updating the reference to the official URL. I have updated the reference to point to https://www.education.gov.in/en/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/upload_document/awardees2002.pdf, this is not an award from the university, it is from the President of India, APJ Kalam, please see the reference in the PDF, number 11 on page 1 is Prof. S.B. Raghunathacharya. Thank you. Sbssmadhav (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sbraghunathacharya.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sbraghunathacharya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sbrraghunathacharya2.jpg

The file File:Sbrraghunathacharya2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly uploaded for the now deleted article S. B. Raghunathacharya. Orphan with no apparent encyclopedic value. Appears to be an image of and image so possible copyright issues for the source image.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 12:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Presidentaward.jpg

The file File:Presidentaward.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly uploaded for the now deleted article S. B. Raghunathacharya. Orphan with no apparent encyclopedic value. Claimed as 'own work' by uploader but this is likely to apply to the image rather than the certificate imaged so possible copyright issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 12:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Apjkalam and sbpadmasri.jpg

The file File:Apjkalam and sbpadmasri.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly uploaded for the now deleted article S. B. Raghunathacharya. Orphan with no apparent encyclopedic value. Appears to be an image of and image so possible copyright issues for the source image.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 12:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sbraghunathacharya3.jpg

The file File:Sbraghunathacharya3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly uploaded for the now deleted article S. B. Raghunathacharya. Orphan with no apparent encyclopedic value. Claimed as 'own work' by uploader but other uploads by this user makes this questionable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 12:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]