User talk:Saurabh Kumar Chaubey
May 2020
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dominion of Pakistan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 16:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
August 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Adakiko. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Languages of Uttar Pradesh seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Languages of Uttar Pradesh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Languages of Uttar Pradesh. Adakiko (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
BHOJPURI belongs to Easter group of languages, it's second most spoken language of Uttar Pradesh as per latest available census data, Some of the maithili propogandist from bihar are editing the Uttar Pradesh language wikipedia to spread wrong information, please take correct action on them the thing i reverted was exactly the same which was there from last 10 years i.e 2011 census data Saurabh Kumar Chaubey Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
They have updated the wrong info on Wikipedia and i just correct it with the info which was in place from last 10 years, latest available census data and government of India clearly shows that BHOJPURI is second most spoken language of UP, But some guys are trying to edit the wiki i reported the same last month also to protect this page but no action was taken Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Saurabh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Languages of Uttar Pradesh seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Saurabh (talk) 11:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Languages of Uttar Pradesh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Languages of Uttar Pradesh. Hello, I'm Adakiko. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Languages of Uttar Pradesh seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Languages of Uttar Pradesh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Languages of Uttar Pradesh.Saurabh (talk) Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 07:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 07:50, 7 August 2022 (UTC)This is like dictatorship, i did'nt edited anything i just reverted the page to it's original form in which it was, this page had same information from last 1 year or so but someguys edited it approx 20 days back and added miss guided information without any source if your read this page it's not even looking professional. I just reverted it to 20 days back info that was there from last 1 year or so. I too tried to talk with him but he doesn't responded also no one from dispute resolution team has responded me. If I did anything wrong but just reverting to right info than I'd of that guy should also be blocked who added these useless information without any source along with mine. Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 16:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Languages of Uttar Pradesh
[edit]BHOJPURI belongs to Easter group of languages, it's second most spoken language of Uttar Pradesh as per latest available census data, Some of the maithili propogandist from bihar are editing the Uttar Pradesh language wikipedia to spread wrong information, please take correct action on them the thing i reverted was exactly the same which was there from last 10 years i.e 2011 census data Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- The wp:BURDEN is on you to cite sources. Also, please use English only. See wp:NOINDICSCRIPT thank you Adakiko (talk) 12:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
https://www.uponline.in/about/profile/culture/languages-of-uttar-pradesh Here the source link for census result, Bhojpuri is second most spoken language of UP Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
3 revert warning
[edit]Your recent editing history at Languages of Uttar Pradesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Wiki is endorsing wrong information if you go in history of this page this info which I updated was there from last 10 years but suddenly you guys wanted to revert it to something new which anyone has edited which is not correct i already shared census data but you guys are not ready to accept it, i will raise dispute but till that time at least revert it to 1 month back info current information is full of propoganda Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
https://www.uponline.in/about/profile/culture/languages-of-uttar-pradesh Here the source link for census result, Bhojpuri is second most spoken language of UP Saurabh Kumar Chaubey Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- No one will insert a source for you by asking for it here. You have to do that yourself. Second, your request at Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request will not be answered. Dispute resolution requests are not accepted from that page. Third, even if you had made the request at the right place it would have been rejected because extensive talk page discussion is a prerequisite to obtaining dispute resolution at English Wikipedia. To say that differently, to qualify for dispute resolution you must have first attempted to work the issue out yourself by discussing it at Talk:Languages of Uttar Pradesh. If another editor will not discuss, consider the advice given at WP:DISCFAIL. Finally, realize that dispute resolution here is not a court deciding who is right and who is wrong: it's a process to help editors come to consensus by facilitating the discussion between them. There is no court, agency, or administrator here who has the right to decide what is to be included in Wikipedia or excluded from Wikipedia. Inclusion and exclusion is determined by the consensus of editors, subject to the encyclopedia's policies and guidelines concerning inclusion of content. You seem to be struggling with newcomer issues; you might do well to seek help at The Wikipedia Teahouse, a place designed to help newcomers struggling with Wikipedia's ways of doing things. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Those are propogandist and you guys are supporting it,Just revert it to 10-20 days back which had the source because recently no change to language has happened Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 18:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Languages of Uttar Pradesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 07:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
is closed. Personalized message carried over below--
So, I see two problems-- you inserted personal commentary and edit warred over it. Please see WP:OR and WP:EW. Instead of addressing those problems, you are telling me why your edits are right. (Admins don't take sides in content disputes.) The place to make the case for your preferred version was in the first instance the article talk page. It's good you attempted dispute resolution. That needs to be at WP:DRN, not it's talk page.
But you continued to edit war. You wrote that, "have maintained integrity of wikipedia from many years." The first edit from this account was May of 2020. Have you been blocked using a different account?
Admins do not interfere in or take sides in content disputes, and I decline to do so now. You were edit warring with ordinary users, not admins. At least one was an IP. In an unblock request, if you complain about or demand action against other users, instead of addressing the reasons for the block (your behavior), that request will be declined. I will do so here in a moment.
Basically, you made drastic changes to a long standing article. Those changes were rejected, and you edit warred. It is up to you to convince other editors that you are correct. Please see WP:BRD. Please read the notices you have received on your talk page. You have an original research warning from May 2020, about the time you started with this account.
So by this logic why only my account or I'd is blocked instead of those intruder who has distributed this whole page and added useless information without any source? I didn't edited anything on this Page i just reverted the things which were on this page from last 6 months or so because in government documents it's clearly mentioned that BHOJPURI is second most spoken language of Uttar Pradesh and they edited and added multiple dialects which government of India/Up doesn't even recognise just go and see the history of this page i just reverted to the thing that was there from last few years but someone has added useless things without any source. Not coming to talk i Already initiated talk with him but he did not responded me and in dispute section also no one responded me, If i breached some policy then i should be barred from edit for some period of time not this infinity period also request you to review the history of this page and see the difference that some guys added without any source. I just reverted it didn't tried to edit anything that's it Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Any update on my request Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Any update on my request Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 08:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- What request? I don't see that you have any request pending and there's no reason to assume that anyone is considering one. — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
I have raised request to unblock my this account Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 11:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- If you're talking about what you put above beginning "So by this logic", no one is looking at that. To get reconsideration of your block, you'll have to file a new unblock request since the first request has already been denied. But if you do, you need to do what Deepfriedokra said above: Don't argue whether or not your desired edit is correct, don't talk about other users being blocked or not blocked or their behavior, admit that you tried to introduce personal commentary and then edit warred over it, apologize for doing so, and say - sincerely - you won't do it again. You were blocked for your behavior and until the admins are convinced that you know what you did, are convinced that you realize and acknowledge that it was wrong, and are convinced you are committed to not doing it again you're likely to remain blocked. (I'm not an admin, by the way, just an experienced user.) Even with that you might still not get unblocked since you seem to be struggling with getting a grip on how things work here and comprehending what people say to you. — TransporterMan (TALK) 20:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Saurabh Kumar Chaubey (talk) 16:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)