User talk:SauliH/Archive3

Top

The problem with letting WP Australia handle your article assessment instead of doing it yourself is that the importance parameter has to be considered with reference to the wider project. e.g. King expedition of 1817 is so not top-importance when considered in the wider context of Australia as a whole - its people, its history, its politics, geography, geology, flora, fauna, culture.... That's why I stubbornly continue to manage WP:BANKSIA article assessment separately. Hesperian 05:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been talking to Longhair about this and related stuff a bit. e.g. here. I'm pretty confident that we'll end up with a good assessment system eventually.

And you.

Hesperian 06:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant Earth

I've corrected the AfD nomination - sorry for treading on your toes. :) Tevildo 04:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year =

Hi there, slowly the chaos has moved away and I can spend more time on the jewelry/gems in wikipedia again. I will probably go to the Tucson show as well. Happy New Year in any case :-)

Template

Let me work on a template for different types of articles in the next few days: e.g. a jewelry item and a gemstone ? Would that work (to prevent double work). Will you go to Tucson ?

Not yet template.. more in my own mind. So no double work.. but good I asked ! See I am pretty new to the procedures and where to connect what. You should go to Tucson some day.. it's getting overwhelmingly big though.. I will check out the template and see what happens. I saw an admin called Femto is also pretty active.. and there's one guy active in the pearl section (need to look up name). Else we could also set up a chat one day, so we can perhaps easier coordinate. I am less familiar with all of this than you are, (and I feel I can contribute in creating proper references and check info, as well as write stubs or add paragraphs (and it's also what I like most).. but I am a horrible organizer.. so I am more than happy to tag along any structure you want to provide/create.

Gem-fanat 18:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me digest what you just wrote me :-) I am not sure I got the drift of it.. Gem-fanat 20:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fact tags

Hi - I have removed a bunch of fact tags that you added to the diamond article. The article is well referenced and additional tags should be reserved for controversial issues, not material verifiable by the general references of the article. The addition of so many of the ugly tags severely disrupts the flow of the article and is simply bad form. I noted that in several instances two tags were added to the same sentence and consider that as absurd. The overuse of the tags lessens their effect where really needed. I noticed in one paragraph on hardness several tags had been added ignoring the fact that the paragraph was sourced by a Harvard reference at the end. I appreciate the work you are doing with the gemology project, but please ease off on the fact tag overkill. Vsmith 17:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:War article linking

No problem, you should also have a link to the article Japanese air attacks on Australia, 1942-43 it is mostly complete. Hossen27 07:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

would you consider deleting...

As part of the WP:CTT project and category:UTC-5 work, would you be kind enough to request the deletion of the following page User:SauliH/templ for towns. This will help with the categorization of the cities. --CyclePat 01:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DB template iin place SauliH 02:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick. Thank you! --CyclePat 05:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

back from Tucson

Hi there.. you missed something. Tucson gem show was great ! I can pick up some wikipedia work now again (though I will also be moving house once again in the next 2 months) and can work on the pearl, gemstone, jade and diamond articles. I saw a lot of changes in de Beers and I wasn't too happy that the whole article was totally replaced by a new one.. so I think we should also discuss the approach in editing these well established articles, structure and sources, before suddenly throwing a whole new version at it, as it happened with the De Beers article. Gem-fanat 17:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saul,

great thanks very much. As you can I see I had a few problems getting the references right in the wikipedia but I DO like the present form much better. I have added some links already... and I enjoy doing that. Will get to do some more writing as well now and check out your links !

Gem-fanat 16:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sense

You must obviously have some, congratulations (ie John F..) Satu Suro 05:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:GEM talk page banner

Can I ask about your comment on the Template:WP Gemology and Jewelry? ...check if this template has been placed in the right place What do you mean? SauliH 05:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall any statements like that, so I don't know what you are referring to. I removed some blank lines from the template that caused a blank space on Talk:Turquoise. Gimmetrow 16:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "check if this template..." text was in the template and existed prior to my edit. All I did was combine that line with the previous line; it has been there since you created the template. Gimmetrow 19:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UCFD

I have nominated a category you created, Category:Wikipedians who will not drink Foster's beer, for deletion. You can contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. Thanks, VegaDark 22:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GEM and "Nested"

Hi, Sauli! I'd be glad to! Do you want the assessment rating to show on the one-line summary? And what about the sub-projects - like Jewelry, Business, People, etc? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the code. You can use it on any page with multiple templates, but if the other templates haven't implemented the code, they won't show their single-line summary. The code should look like this on the talk page:

{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1=
{{WP Gemology and Jewelry | class=B | lapidary=yes | nested=yes }}
{{OtherWikiProject | class=B | nested=yes}}
}}

The two things that always catch me are the "|1=" and making sure each project template has "|nested=yes".

Enjoy! :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond Page

I just wanted to say thanks for helping to clean up the formation section. It was really terrible before but now it is quite nice. Thanks! Colincbn 17:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup on 23rd April 2007

Hi SauliH,

Apologies if you're already aware of this, but I'd like to let you know that the second Adelaide Meetup will take place on Monday 23rd of April at ZUMA Caffe, 56 Gouger Street, Adelaide. The meeting is at 7:30am for breakfast with Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Meetup 2 for more details and indicate if you might attend.

Thanks,–cj | talk 13:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NB: The above message is being delivered to users who are listed at WikiProject Adelaide or in Category:Wikipedians in South Australia with AutoWikiBrowser.

If I can help with the Gemmology project let me know. I have posted some PDF files of data that I have begun to assemble at: http://groups.google.com/group/gemology?lnk=iggc

Padparadsha sapphire article

I've looked at this one a couple times, thinking about tidying it up, but have finally concluded that it should really be a section in the sapphire article instead of on its own. Seems like the recent buzz about this variety has more to do with new treatments than its traditional rarity. What do you think, expand or merge? Thanks Olneya 03:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope all is well

Hi there... haven't seen you around for a while.. hope all is well ! Could use the help on the gemology topic ! Cheers Gem-fanat 21:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Synthetic Diamond

We've made some changes to the Synthetic diamond page in hopes of cleaning it up. Could you take a look at it sometime and try and let us know what needs to be done to improve it? Thanks for your help. PitOfBabel 20:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Adelaide Meetup
Next: 15 November 2024
Last: 6 March 2020
This box: view • talk • edit

Hi SauliH - we're planning a third meetup in Adelaide sometime in the coming weeks, and would love to have you there. If you can, please help decide a location, a date and a time here. Thanks! ~ Riana ⁂ 12:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you are listed at Wikipedia:ADEL#Participants. If you do not live in Adelaide/South Australia and cannot make it to the meetup, please accept my apologies!

Brisbane meetup

	Brisbane Meetup v t e Next: To be decided (watch) Last: Saturday 13 January 2018
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Sorry you got this later than some other people - took the lazy botop 2 days to run :) Giggabot (talk) 07:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Adelaide Meetup
Next: 15 November 2024
Last: 6 March 2020
This box: view • talk • edit

Hi SauliH - after some planning we've decided to hold the third Adelaide Wikimeetup on Sunday, 17th February, 2008. The meeting will be held at Billy Baxter's in Rundle Mall at 11:30AM. Further details and directions are available on the meetup page. Please RSVP here by 20:00UTC on 15th February 2008 (that's 6AM Saturday for our time zone) so that we can inform the restaurant about numbers. Hope to see you there!

You are receiving this message because you are in Category:Wikipedians in South Australia or are listed at WP:ADEL#Participants. If this has been sent in error, please accept our apologies!

On behalf of Riana ⁂, 11:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:GIA diamond color scale

A tag has been placed on Template:GIA diamond color scale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]