User talk:Satyacyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Satyacyclopedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Marina Bondarko, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Marina Bondarko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Marina Bondarko, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me jamie

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your text has no in-line independent third-party sources, and nothing in your text suggests that she meets our notability criteria linked above. This isn't FaceBook, you can't just write anything Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamie, i know you are blocking me because you want money. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fascinating theory. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't want money and I'm not unblocking you. You will not be unblocked to use Wikipedia for promotion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen aspersions like that from those writing promotionally. Is there some sort of online seminar where they tell people to come out swinging or something? Satyacyclopedia, I gotta let you know that casting aspersions in the manner you have done is grounds for blocking, apart from using Wikipedia for promotion. Please see WP:NPA. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Now I found this discussion page, I was finding it earlier but I was not getting it, so I mailed you, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your guidance.

I will not do promotional writings henceforth, I will first discuss about it with you. You seems a nice person on Wikipedia.

I will start small, its my humble request to you kindly unblock me, and i am sorry from the bottom of my heart 💓

You all are well experienced guys, you are the Kings of Wikipedia, there are lots of debates across this website, but you handle it quickly, respect to each one of you, especially you.

Satyacyclopedia (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

You need to discuss unblocking here, on your talk page. You demand guidance. Please read and heed the WP:COI notice and the other messages you have received. Calling other users motherfuckers is not going to help you to be unblocked. If you cannot accept guidance and mistake it for "ego and attitude", guiding you may be difficult. However, you need to discuss unblocking and receive guidance here, on your talk page. To be unblocked, you must recognize that you will not be unblocked to promote Marina Bondarko or any other subject. If you are trained to write in a promotional style, you might find it difficult to learn to write in an encyclopedic style.

Article creation is not easy, especially for new users. If you are here not to promote someone but to help build the encyclopedia, I recommend that you start small. You can make improvements to existing articles. There are many articles that require improvement. You can find links to them at WP:Community portal. Once you agree to stop trying to promote, for example, Marina Bondarko, and agree to make constructive edits, we can consider unblocking you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In order to promote communication that is open to scrutiny by the community, that is above board and non secretive, I have muted your ability to email me. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Now I found this discussion page, I was finding it earlier but I was not getting it, so I mailed you, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your guidance.

I will not do promotional writings henceforth, I will first discuss about it with you. You seems a nice person on Wikipedia.

I will start small, its my humble request to you kindly unblock me, and i am sorry from the bottom of my heart 💓

You all are well experienced guys, you are the Kings of Wikipedia, there are lots of debates across this website, but you handle it quickly,huge respect to each one of you, especially you.

Satyacyclopedia (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any god? Reading my message. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Deepfriedokra

Thank you! Now I found this discussion page, I was finding it earlier but I was not getting it, so I mailed you, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your guidance.

I will not do promotional writings henceforth, I will first discuss about it with you. You seems a nice person on Wikipedia.

I will start small, its my humble request to you kindly unblock me, and i am sorry from the bottom of my heart 💓

You all are well experienced guys, you are the Kings of Wikipedia, there are lots of debates across this website, but you handle it quickly, respect to each one of you, especially you. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For an unblock to be considered, you'd first have to explicitly agree to not write about yourself. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I explicitly agree to not write about myself, I will start small, Marina Bondarko is my friend, she is different I am different,we will have discussions then only I will write about her. Else I won't write about her, rather I'll help Wikipedia grow. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamie please unblock me. I won't do promotional writings here Satyacyclopedia (talk) 14:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for your reply Jamie Satyacyclopedia (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamie Satyacyclopedia (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See you guys are not even replying me, my head started aching again Satyacyclopedia (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let's pretend that you are not Marina Bondarko. Do you explicitly agree to not write about Marina Bondarko? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will discuss Marina Bondarko topic with you first, then only I'll write about her, else I will not write about her. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 00:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be unblocked unless you explicitly agree to not write about Marina Bondarko, period. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,I EXPLICITLY AGREE I WILL NOT WRITE ABOUT MARINA BONDARKO, IF I WRITE ANYTHING ABOUT HER YOU CAN BLOCK ME. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 02:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to create an unblock request for someone else to review, following the instructions here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satyacyclopedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I EXPLICITLY AGREE TO NOT WRITE ABOUT MARINA BONDARKO, I WILL MAKE HONEST CONTRIBUTIONS TO OTHER SIMPLE THINGS ON WIKIPEDIA WEBSITE Satyacyclopedia (talk) 03:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, please make a request that does not yell(use all capital letters). 331dot (talk) 08:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrators please see this and unblock me ASAP Satyacyclopedia (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I request again? Satyacyclopedia (talk) 09:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Satyacyclopedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I explicitly agree to not write about Marina Bondarko, I will make honest contributions to other simple things on Wikipedia website. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocking per your agreement and with the ok of the blocking admin.331dot (talk) 13:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What topics do you want to contribute about? 331dot (talk) 09:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging Satyacyclopedia (talk) 10:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In what topic areas? 331dot (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know topics, that Wikipedia app shows random images, I can tag that simple images, and whichever I don't know I ignore it. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'm still new to the app. I don't know more about it let me explore it. Satyacyclopedia (talk) 10:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will note that the app does not provide full functionality; some(though not all) find it easier to use the desktop version in a browser on your phone. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Satyacyclopedia (talk) 10:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out jamie Satyacyclopedia (talk) 12:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with an unblock given that the user has agreed to the conditions above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 💝 Satyacyclopedia (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.