User talk:Satruth

Hello, I'm Bellerophon5685. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

This is your first warning for blatant vandalism of the The Salvation Army in Australia page. Further vandalism will result in intervention by the administrators, suspension or being permanently blocked from editing wikipedia.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to The Salvation Army, Australia Eastern Territory has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Salvation Army, Australia Eastern Territory was changed by Satruth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962296 on 2013-05-09T03:11:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Danger ^{High voltage!} 03:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satruth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

dragonlord's assumption is incorrect and your blocking of this account unfounded. My initials are S and A and everything I have written is truthfull and I am willing to back up my word in a court of law. (Satruth (talk) 03:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

Actually, this edit suffices for blocking. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.