User talk:Satrar

Help

Hello hope you are doing well, Can you please help to semi-protect London Nahi Jaunga page as there are so many illegal or unsourced edits making on the page weather it's about the box office update or budget also if you notice this from now that any unsourced or illogical edit happened please reverted it before they'll make it hell.... Thanks ShokLionYt (talk) 24:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ShokLionYt, appears to be a test edit which I have reverted. Let's see if there are other sock IPs. That's all for now. Satrar (talk) 20:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Satrar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Satrar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 17:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Pakistan-related topics

Hello. I noticed that you made several questionable edits to Separatist movements of Pakistan and CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. In this edit, you added that "in Azad Kashmir, 95% of respondents voted for all of Kashmir to accede to Pakistan" and that "The survey states, 94 % of Kashmiri's in Pakistan administered Kashmir wanted to join Pakistan." Both of these statements contradict the source, which states on page 17 that "AJK: 50% said they would vote for the whole of J&K to join Pakistan". Additionally, you replaced one instance of the source with a blog, which are generally considered to be unreliable.

In this edit, you reverted a sourced addition with the claim that it was "vandalism and removal of poorly sourced". While the source is of questionable neutrality, the article was clear to note that it was only a claim, and was not presenting the information as factual. - ZLEA _T\^C 17:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZLEA, actually the user I reported is clearly biased and quoting Indian sources (that too unreliable ones) and I'm sure they have been doing vandalism and edit war for long even before they have created the account. Moreover when I have reported them, they started begging to admins and giving rationale being Indian including racially profiling me. The articles you are talking about are heavily biased edited by socks and that's why I came out of that debate because I don't want to fight. Please keep in mind United Nations' resolutions are pending against these issues and merely refs can't convince them if UN resolutions can't. Thank you very much for the concern you have shown but remember they can't be reasoned with and clearly they are pursuing agenda of hatred. Regards. Satrar (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm sure they have been doing vandalism and edit war for long even before they have created the account." What made you come to that conclusion? Because they're Indian?

"Please keep in mind United Nations' resolutions are pending against these issues and merely refs can't convince them if UN resolutions can't." How do you know that Echo1Charlie will not listen to UN resolutions if said resolutions are pending? Furthermore, what does that have to do with the neutrality of the articles? UN resolutions are not reliable sources.

And finally, the claim that Echo1Charlie is pursuing an "agenda of hatred" is a bit extreme. How does their editing history show such behavior? All I have seen is them using Indian sources which, from what I see, do not contain hate language of any sort. - ZLEA _T\^C 16:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZLEA, instead of being sanctimonious why don't you do something usefull? I don't really care about what you think. So just don't waste your time here on my talk page. I'm grateful for your concern. Satrar (talk) 10:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to what you may think, I am trying to be useful. I see that you appear to be engaging in Tendentious editing by making unconstructive edits and are engaging in edit wars with Echo1Charlie. This shows that you have a lack of concern for Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I don't care how biased and "hateful" you think they are, there is no situation where your behavior is acceptable. Furthermore, you seem to have a bias when it comes to the Indo-Pakistani conflict. It's perfectly understandable, given the heated relationships the two countries have, but if you can't control the bias then it is best to leave the Indo-Pakistani topics alone and edit other areas of Wikipedia. You could argue that Echo1Charlie is biased as well, which may be the case, but they appear to be controlling it better than you, meanwhile you blatantly misrepresent the data in sources. You seem to have four of the five common tendencies of disruptive editors. You may think it's a waste of time for me to talk to you about it here, but similar behavior has gotten other editors blocked. If you want me to drop the discussion, I will, but please heed my advice. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZLEA, I'm as neutral as USA in case of China, WMDs (which were never found in Iraq) and last but not the least Afghanistan. So why don't you show conscious of your neutrality to some of your favorites like Israel? I hope at 19 years of age you are aware of biases. Get a job it's hight time for you. Satrar (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to remain civil throughout this discussion, and that was totally uncalled for. I very rarely edit articles on any of those topics, and when I do, I try to stay away from the heavily politicized areas. I don't pretend to be neutral on topics where I am biased, but I do my best to edit constructively and never POV push. If you think I am, feel free to show some diffs. Furthermore, assuming that Israel is one of my "favorites" just because I am an American is ethnic profiling. Furthermore, I do have a job, which you would know if you actually took a deep look at my userpage rather than skimming it.

Your reply only confirms that you are not being here to build an encyclopedia, but rather push your POV. - ZLEA _T\^C 18:25, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZLEA, already told you leave my talk page but out of your immaturity you are again and again showing up. Why don't you along with your friend open a fan page for the countries you admire? But I'm not interested in arguing with you or anyone else. Take some time off and familiarize yourself with the basic Wikipedia polices so that you understand the meaning of WP:NOTHERE. Why don't you do something meaningful in your life other than leveling baseless accusations against me at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and getting nothing out of it? I'm not fighting with anyone and don't care about the pages you mentioned. So get a job dude instead of wasting everyone's time. Satrar (talk) 06:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to leave your talk page, I suggest that you stop making personal attacks. We may disagree on some things, but there's no reason why we can't be civil about it. - ZLEA _T\^C 01:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZLEA, you talk about civilized behavior but your actions are contrary to this. You begged every admin to block me and after repulsion from every where now you are taking about courtesies. Anyways, I got nothing against you and I still appreciate your offer but you don't have to show up again and again. By the way I have won a 50 dollar bet from a friend that you will out of your anxiety, show up here again. Regards. Satrar (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't exactly call it a fair bet if you poked the bear by making a personal attack. It is you who is making the baseless accusations by your ethnic profiling of both Indian and American editors as automatically having an anti-Pakistan bias when it is in fact you who is misrepresenting sources to appear pro-Pakistan. If I am wrong, please explain how I am without any of the incivilities.

And on a side note, asking an admin to look over your behavior is not "begging" them to block you. I realize that you have made numerous constructive edits outside the Indo-Pakistan conflict topic, so I don't think a block is entirely necessary so long as you stop making personal attacks. - ZLEA _T\^C 12:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ZLEA I won another bet from the same friend just now. Already told you to take some time off and read the basics of editing on Wikipedia especially do read WP:IDONTLIKE. Now I'm telling you in plain words you are not welcome anymore on my talk page. So do not post more personal attacks and just go away because I don't wanna argue with you. Get a job and do something meaningful in your life instead of wasting and posting personal attacks here. Your behavior only confirms that you are not being here to build an encyclopedia. Good luck and don't come back. Satrar (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page review

Hello, would you kindly review the new article Kamal Ahmed (music director). During the last days, some editors corrupted it with false name and image. Thanks! Insight 3 (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Insight 3, I have gone through the article. You are doing a good job. Keep it up. Satrar (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Firstly I would like to congratulate you on removing edits by banned users and keeping Wikipedia clean. A blocked sock called Koreangauteng made this edit [1] a while ago and this edit still remains on the article surely it should be removed his sourcing is based on unverified claims by a twitter account of a human rights activist surprised how nobody removed these edits please do remove it. Sutrapor (talk) 06:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sutrapor, You can remove it yourself if it doesn't qualify WP:RS. You must also read WP:BANREVERT.- Satrar (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saifuddin Saif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partition. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with suspected sockpuppetry

Hi Satrar, thank you for correctly voicing your concern at WP:SPI. However, until that case has been closed, please avoid reverting the reported user with edit summaries such as the one displayed in Special:Diff/1115457271, and avoid edit warring. The matter needs to be resolved first. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, thank you for your concern. I will definitely keep a cool head.-Satrar (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been correct, thank you very much for your work and patience. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+rollback

Hi Satrar,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
Use common sense.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note: Check out my User:ToBeFree/common.css for the code needed to remove Twinkle's red "VANDALISM" link. This makes it easier to focus on the actual rollback link. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely. Regards.- Satrar (talk) 19:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kthxbay per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kthxbay. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 12:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]