Jump to content

User talk:Satnam Sokhal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Satnam Sokhal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Satnam Sokhal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netplus Broadband (November 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 09:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netplus Broadband (December 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found.
K.e.coffman (talk) 22:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Netplus Broadband

[edit]

I just looked at your draft, and all the references consist of press releases and articles which repeat the content of press releases. A WP:Reliable source should consist of what other, disinterested individuals write or say about a subject (customer reviews do not qualify). If I were in your position, I'd acknowledge that trying to put forth a Wikipedia article on Netplus Broadband represents time wasted.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Satnam Sokhal. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Netplus Broadband, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Satnam Sokhal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Satnam Sokhal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Satnam Sokhal! You created a thread called Please Help Me To Write A Article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Satnam Sokhal! You created a thread called Can you write an article for me? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gbawden were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Satnam Sokhal/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Satnam Sokhal/sandbox. Thanks! Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 16:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The comment left by CoolSkittle was: Draft:Netplus Broadband exists! Please improve and submit that instead. Do not resubmit this redundant sandbox page.
CoolSkittle (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jupitus Smart 15:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satnam Sokhal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Satnam Sokhal/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satnam Sokhal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Fastway Transmission Pvt. Ltd.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 15:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satnam Sokhal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fastway Transmissions Pvt. Ltd.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]