User talk:Satanicfacts

September 2024

Hello, I'm GenoV84. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Theistic Satanism have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Dod you say the same to Michael Ford? My contribution was completely factual. 2601:840:4001:3200:5880:9AC1:6569:7A16 (talk) 13:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, because Ford is untrustworthy and unreliable as much as any other leader of a religious group. I would question any source that correlates an individualized height/weight with religious affiliation, no matter what. GenoV84 (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

• Did. Nice agenda.

2601:840:4001:3200:5880:9AC1:6569:7A16 (talk) 13:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

No agenda, only rules and guidelines. If you don't like them, feel free to leave. GenoV84 (talk) 20:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Nah, I'm definitely not leaving, cupcake. 2601:840:4001:3200:5880:9AC1:6569:7A16 (talk) 21:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You look cringe, bro 😂. GenoV84 (talk) 21:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

nah thats all you, princess. Satanicfacts (talk) 22:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Still cringy, sissygirl 🤣 GenoV84 (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

lol nah. too bad they let pussy ass keyboard warriors like you on here. pretty pathetic Satanicfacts (talk) 22:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Gawd, You are SO MAD!!! You still can't find any reliable source about your precious, little "Temple of the Inverted Cross", am I right? 😂😂😂 GenoV84 (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Definitely not mad, cupcake. But you do seem to have an agenda, considering I posted an actual book referencing the Temple of the Inverted Cross published almost 20 years ago. I know it's difficult for you not having accomplished anything notable for yourself, but you're 100 percent wrong on this one, princess ;) Satanicfacts (talk) 22:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Demonstrate that this so-called source qualifies as WP:RELIABLE and WP:NOTABLE according to WP standards, instead of insulting other editors and crying about it like a small child. GenoV84 (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 22:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Yep. Tell Geno. Vindictively deleting my articles that are sourced. Satanicfacts (talk) 22:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Show us where is the reliable, academic, trustworthy source that demonstrates the existence and encyclopedic notability of this Satanist group which I have never heard of before your edits, then (maybe) we can talk. GenoV84 (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

This is wikipedia, cupcake. Nothing academic, reliable, or trustworthy about it, thanks to little zeroes like you lololol and you never hearing of something does not discount its existence, princess. ;) Satanicfacts (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You have clearly demonstrated that you don't care about what Wikipedia is, and no one is going to undue your disruptive edits. GenoV84 (talk) 22:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You've already been smacked down by an admit. Do yourself a favor and keep that yap shut, cupcake. Satanicfacts (talk) 22:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

The warning was for you, on your own talk page. GenoV84 (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

lol whatever you say, Vageno lollolol Satanicfacts (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You have no source, admit it. We both know. GenoV84 (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

I've posted it repeatedly, and you've deleted it repeatedly. Predictable behavior from a zero like you. Satanicfacts (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Demonstrate that this so-called source qualifies as WP:RELIABLE and WP:NOTABLE according to WP standards, instead of insulting other editors and crying about it like a small child. GenoV84 (talk) 22:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

I would suggest you drop the name calling also, cupcake. Ruins your facade of impartiality and "credibility" lololol we both know you're just a pathetic keyboard warrior though. Have fun with that, Vageno lololol Satanicfacts (talk) 23:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You have no source, admit it. We both know. GenoV84 (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

They let pseudo-intellectuals like you on here? lol you've been thoroughly embarrassed for posterity, cupcake ;) Satanicfacts (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Ban Geno also he called me names like "sissygirl" and taunted me. Will he face disciplinary action? or is this a one sided attack from the admins? Satanicfacts (talk) 23:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Theistic Satanism. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 20:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Block Geno also He's called me names like "sissygirl" Satanicfacts (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Satanicfacts (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Nah. You deserve it more 90.255.149.82 (talk) 00:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

lol what a coward you are Satanicfacts (talk) 00:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)