User talk:Sara.sato

Sara.sato, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sara.sato! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Even in the Quietest Moments... does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Breakfast in America contains an edit summary that appears to have triggered the edit filter. The summary may have contained inappropriate text such as a highly repetitive character sequence, profanity, gibberish, or all-caps. Please use appropriate edit summaries to tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. If your summary did not contain such text, please report it to the false positives page and remove this message. Short sections are not frowned on, and headings are not needed as they are present in the heading parameters. Feel free to discuss rather than edit without summaries and without warring over the content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will let you self-revert this edit before I report your breaking of WP:3RR. WP:OVERSECTION states "Very short or very long sections and subsections in an article look cluttered and inhibit the flow of the prose" and this is a case where we have short sections. The track listings are not notably long. You should also 1) have explained your edits, which you did not do, and 2) you have not attempted to discuss. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sara.sato reported by User:Walter Görlitz (Result: ). Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sara.sato (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Many other wiki articles about other musicians or bands' albums use short sections or subsections without "looking cluttered" or without "inhibiting the flow of the prose"!!! Besides, the track listings are actually notably long! Ultimately, I think Walter Gorlitz has a problem with that, not me! I'm only trying to improve the Breakfast in America article's readability but he constantly and arbitrarily revert my edit! It's not fair being reverting and now blocked from editing with an indefinite expiration time (by Bbb23)!?! Sara.sato (talk) 10:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of this is remotely relevant. You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. That and only that is relevant to being unblocked. Yamla (talk) 10:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.