User talk:SapiensYK

This is SapiensYK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rheinhotel Dreesen (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot be used as a source, it is not reliable because it is user edited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rheinhotel Dreesen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SapiensYK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rheinhotel Dreesen has been accepted

Rheinhotel Dreesen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Tea house question

Hello, SapiensYK. You have new messages at WP:Tea house#Confused on how to post a translation for community review.
Message added Mathglot (talk) 11:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Regarding Rheinhotel Dreesen

Congrats on getting the article approved! I see another editor has switched your direct links to de-wiki for {{ill}}. I don't know if you've read the template's documentation yet, but one big advantage of that template is that it serves as an invitation for other editors to create the red-linked article, and if/when somebody writes the Georg Westen page, a bot will change {{ill}} into a regular link. Also, have you heard of Wikipedia:Did you know? The citation density on this article is too low right now to pass the criteria there, but if you decide to add additional inline citations or do another translation in the future, you can submit the article for a DYK review, and if it's passed, it'll appear on the main page for a day or half of a day. Congrats again on getting things figured out, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I actually made a short draft translation of the Georg Westen article, so hopefully that gets approved. Also I've never heard of "did you know?". I skimmed through the page and couldn't find a section on citation density. Is it more of a rule of thumb than a hard rule? Regarding the article I'm also wondering whether I should do something to indicate that it is a translation. I added information from an source that isn't part of the German version, so I'm not sure. If you have any insight on that I would greatly appreciate it. Yustyn Kokor (talk) 08:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to Wikipedia's main page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page) scroll down, you'll see a list of daily "Did you know ..." facts. These link to articles that have been recently translated, created, expanded, or improved.

The DYK citation stuff is on the guidelines subpage at WP:DYKCITE. In general a reviewer will check for citations at [a] the end of the sentence with the DYK hook/fact, [b] the end of any sentence with a quote, and [c] the end of each paragraph.

And regarding translation status, yes, there are a few things listed at Help:Translation#License requirements including: [i] an edit summary linking to original article and [ii] the optional {{translated page}} template for the talk page; these give credit to the pre-translation editors. Good luck and feel free to reach out, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying to add an attribution statement in revision 1194103769; unfortunately, you added it to the article body content where it does not belong; I've removed it. It belongs in the edit summary field, not the article; please see WP:RIA for what text to use when adding attribution retrospectively, and how to do so using a dummy edit. If you don't understand WP:RIA or have any questions about it, please reply below.

Note to Rjjiii: the way to provide credit to the pre-translation editors is via the edit summary, as you pointed out in [i]. The {{translated page}} template destined for the Talk page is a convenience info template only, and strictly optional as you pointed out. Mathglot (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Westen (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georg Westen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Georg Westen

Hello, SapiensYK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georg Westen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Georg Westen

Hello, SapiensYK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Georg Westen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]