User talk:Sandra1813

Welcome!

Hi Sandra1813! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Voltmend (talk) 19:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Voltmend! How kind of you to welcome me, and thank you for sending me the useful links. I look forward to contributing to Wikipedia, especially as I'm a happy stickler for sources!! :) Sandra1813 (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pierre Scheemackers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pierre Scheemackers. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Scheemackers (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable but way too much original research and conjecture.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pierre Scheemackers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pierre Scheemackers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sandra1813! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Scheemackers has been accepted

Pierre Scheemackers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for accepting my draft article! Has really made my day :) I hope others - particularly in France where his works were made and displayed - may come across the page, and add more info. Thank you also for your clear guidance and feedback (wish my master's thesis supervisor had been as good 35 years ago, ha ha). Wishing you a good day. Sandra1813 (talk) 09:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]