User talk:Sandgem Addict/Archives2009/June

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Guilty Pleasure (Cobra Starship song) has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6mful7wtaa). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Help

{{helpme}} Was that edit allowed? -- Teen Sleepover Kid (talk) 05:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

No. We tend to frown on linking to copyright violations. //roux   06:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

"get a life" pic

This is the most famous of all such things. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 19:24, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

"Fuck the Facts"

I thought I'd let you know I put my own two cents into the GA review page. Feel free to check it out! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Taking a quick look at the article, I feel the quickfail was justified. Good work! CarpetCrawler (talk) 03:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Article

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Article you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Capital punishment

The article Capital punishment you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Capital punishment for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Took about 20 minutes. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting that vandlism to my userpage, I've been the only huggle user on for a while, so great to see some one else, again, thanks Spitfire^Tally-ho! 10:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

ARIA Charts

It was just updated last night - [1]. There you go :) Ss112 05:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 27 June 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)