User talk:Sanchogalileo

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sanchogalileo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. MartinPoulter (talk) 13:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Self-citation

Thanks for your nice edits to articles metal sulfides. Please read WP:COI. A high percentage of your citations are to your own publications, which poses a conflict of interest. The way to address this problem is to completely avoid citing your own papers. Or do so rarely. I am sure that your intentions are completely honorable, so my advice is offered only to help a good editor avoid potential issues. Best wishes and happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Smokefoot. Thank you for your observation. I am sorry for that - I am relatively new to wikipedia editing, and I was trying to write something about things I know about. But of course I understand that self-citation should be avoided. I have undone some of my recent changes which included self-citations and will be more careful in the future. Best wishes. Sanchogalileo (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I was just suggesting that you be careful, because you appear to be a promising editor and we have few that know enough to even publish. Many of us started in the same way as you did (actually your papers looked great), I just want to protect a promising editor. The main thing that we need are references to textbooks and reviews. So please keep up the good work. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ceria-zirconia, from its old location at User:Sanchogalileo/Ceria-zirconia. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 13:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceria-zirconia (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ceria-zirconia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Sanchogalileo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceria-zirconia has been accepted

Ceria-zirconia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LoudLizard (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, but be careful

Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:

• Wikipedia prefers citations to reviews and books, not primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style.
• Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves mainly. That behavior is unacceptable.

If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quantitative Estimation of Druglikeness moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Quantitative Estimation of Druglikeness. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)