User talk:SanapalaSridhar

January 2023

Hello, I'm Zerbu. I noticed that in this edit to Rajasthan Royals, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zerbu ^💬 08:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WPL

Your recent edits on WPL have been undid because you didn't provided reliable sources, WP don't allow original research or speculative info.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi Capitals (WPL) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Delhi Capitals (WPL), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Capitals (WPL) (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Capitals (WPL) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 00:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SanapalaSridhar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 00:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel changes

2023 Women's Premier League (cricket) doesn't need a section for "Personnel changes", as there are no changes. Currently there are teams with no players or staff, and that will get fixed when the player auction/draft happens. No need to create a "Personnel changes" section with one redlink to an article that will never exist at that name. When the auction happens, if that warrants a separate article, then that can be linked into 2023 Women's Premier League (cricket), but the article you've created List of 2023 Women's Premier League personnel changes is unnecessary junk. No changes have occurred, and it's nonsense to create an article saying things have changed. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of 2023 Women's Premier League personnel changes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of 2023 Women's Premier League personnel changes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disruptively editing articles around this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article with correct history is at Draft:List of 2023 Women's Premier League personnel changes. Do not just create a new copy of it at List of 2023 Women's Premier League personnel changes, as this is a cut-and-paste move, which is not acceptable. This article should only exist when the issues I raised at the draft talkpage are resolved, and sources are added to demonstrate it passes WP:GNG. If you make another cut and paste move of this, I will report you to WP:ANI. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2023 Women's Premier League (cricket), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of 2023 Indian Premier League personnel changes. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vallabharebel per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vallabharebel. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]