User talk:Sana Jisushi

Precure 5 episode summaires

I believe that the episode summaries should not be so vaguely short, and that they should be moved to a separate page if you think it's too big for the main article. What do you think? Justicebullet 05:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that "vaguely short" is the point of an episode summary on the page. A seperate page or an article for each episode would be good if you want an age and a half of speaking, but vaguely short, to me, is a good thing. Sana Jisushi 01:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, anyways, about the fansub mention of "effervescing" — I personally think you should reword that statement so as not to mention any "fansubness" because like I said, we're not trying to focus on what the fansub says, but the series itself. It'd good you want to point this out, but maybe a restatement would do.

Out of random, I found this in the history page: "Two, this user seems to have a chronic deletion problem." Well, to be cautious, if you were referring to me, you should have at least attempted to discuss this manner on my talk page instead of deliberately pointing fingers. Although I am not saying you are saying that you're talking about me, I do find that pretty rude, whoever it is you're talking about. Justicebullet 06:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha

Is there a specific guideline on whether spoilers should appear in the characters' section of an article? I'm sure there are articles on both sides of the argument, so I suppose it's not really black and white. Anyway, on the issue of Alicia Testarossa, the matter was discussed briefly on the talk page. As I have stated there, EmperorBrandon makes a good point in that Alicia is not really that notable of a character. Considering that no one else has a page, hers should probably be removed since it gives a rather skewed and awkward feel to the article. If you are very keen on keeping it spoiler-free (that seems to be the case, given your conservative edits), please raise the issue in the talk page, I don't really mind personally, but I think the Alicia article really needs to go...well, unless every other major/minor character is going to get their own page with a decent amount of information added or something. --Remy Suen 02:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Nicole Whittaker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole Whittaker.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Nicole-screen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole-screen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nicole-screen.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole-screen.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? It is used... Nicole Whittaker has it. Sana Jisushi 01:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You will find if you open the noted file about that the extention is .JPG and the image used on the Nicole Whittaker page is one with an extention .jpg. In this case the capitalization makes a difference and the file is actually uploaded twice. The .JPG is up for deletion, not the .jpg which is in use.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you like my Userbox

have not gotten any word about fair-use from and admin. so i think they are safe. hope you enjoy it.Phoenix741 22:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meganekko

Hello! Recently yuou asked why I removed the information on this supposed "megane-kun" from the [[[meganekko]]page. Well in short, it didn't belong there. Where you put the information really threw off the flow of the page. Meganekko is a phenomenon in anime and manga that has existed for years. They follow a distict pattern and are a visible character arechetype. From what I can tell, "megane-kun" is jsut something fan-created by girls who think guys with glasses are "cute". If you wanted to added megankun, then the bottom of the page fwould have been a better place for it, or even perhaps a new page entierly. I was only trying to keep the flow of the page consistent. it has nothing to do with sexism, as you suggested, although I do question the what thinking a guy with glasses is cute has to do with meganekko. So in closing, I removed it because I felt it was not nessicarry and did not fit the page, not because "the internet is for MEN" If you have any questuions, feel free to ask me (Animedude 05:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Excuse me?

"Hey, Masaichi hater, when has Aoyama-kun ever treated Ichigo like an object?)"

Who is the world are you directting this to? THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 23:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NanohaTakamachi-TriangleHeart.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:NanohaTakamachi-TriangleHeart.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NoelKEhrlichkeit.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:NoelKEhrlichkeit.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nicole Whittaker.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole Whittaker.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NanohaTakamachi Older.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:NanohaTakamachi Older.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alicia Testarossa

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Alicia Testarossa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Book of Darkness

I have nominated Book of Darkness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 03:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alicia Testarossa

I have nominated Alicia Testarossa, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Testarossa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 07:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Signum-Nanoha.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Signum-Nanoha.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SuzukaTsukimura.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SuzukaTsukimura.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RockettMovado.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:RockettMovado.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TakamachiKyouya.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:TakamachiKyouya.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YuunoScrya.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:YuunoScrya.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vita-Nanoha.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Vita-Nanoha.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FiasseChristalla.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:FiasseChristalla.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PreciaTestarossa.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:PreciaTestarossa.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Project Fate

I have nominated Project Fate, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Fate. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 06:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Meganekko

An article that you have been involved in editing, Meganekko, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meganekko. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Shinobu (talk) 01:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of EndGame

I have nominated EndGame, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EndGame. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MiyukiTakamachi.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:MiyukiTakamachi.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 19:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PreciaTestarossa.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PreciaTestarossa.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 00:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arf-Nanoha.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arf-Nanoha.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 23:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RockettsNewSchool.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RockettsNewSchool.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rockett's New School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rockett's New School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockett's New School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ost (talk) 15:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Whittaker listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nicole Whittaker. Since you had some involvement with the Nicole Whittaker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Lugia2453 (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Purple Moon games

Category:Purple Moon games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 03:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article reassessment

Ayu_Tsukimiya, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sana Jisushi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]