User talk:San104567

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of browser games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Platform. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Swastika, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

? San104567 (talk) 08:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 10:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 10:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

San104567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a couple of unusual edits, including one that was purposefully inflammatory. I understand being blocked for a day or something. That being said, I don't think that warrants an indefinite block and all of the constructive edits I made being reverted, like the constructive edits I made on Pseudo-Hilarius and Neologism before they were removed. San104567 (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am not convinced that you won't make inflammatory edits in the future, and I see no reason to disagree with Graham87's assessment. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your edit pattern is incredibly bizarre and you've been making highly controversial edits to articles like Fear of needles. Graham87 10:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trypanophobia is another term for the fear of needles. I added that to the article. Why am I blocked??? San104567 (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting all the pages I made? Can you please unblock me? San104567 (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

San104567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my only account. I only made one purposefully inflammatory edit, to the page The blind leading the blind. I also made a few edits that may not have had enough citations, but everything besides that has been an edit in good faith. I believe that by bulk reverting my edits, wikipedia is a worse encyclopedia overall. Please look at my contributions to Quakers, Neologism, Altered state of consciousness, Pseudepigrapha, Pseudo-Aristotle, List of lexicographers, and List of browser games. Please revert these removals of my edits.

Edit: My edit to the page The blind leading the blind was poking fun at all of wikipedia, including me, because we are all in the same boat working on the same encyclopedia, even though no single person is the authoritative leader, except for maybe Jimbo. I did not mean any ill-intent towards Wikipedians who are blind in the literal sense and not the figurative sense, and I am sorry for causing this disturbance.

Decline reason:

You're using the same computer on the same IP address as Rosedaler. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

San104567 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NinjaRobotPirate has kept the block, saying that I am using the same computer on the same IP address as Rosedaler, who is blocked. But I believe this is false. Please unblock my account. I understand that a portion of my edits were disruptive and I'll avoid making disruptive edits like that in the future.

Decline reason:

Technical evidence does indeed quite clearly indicate that you are the connected to Rosedaler. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.